Metastatic 4S neuroblastoma with excellent outcome in Saudi cancer center ========================================================================= * Waheed A. AlZhrani * Naglla A. Elimam * Abeer S. Almehdar * Saeed M. Bassem * Daniah E. Abdullatif * Khursheed D. Ahmed * Abdullah A. Baothman ## Abstract **Objectives:** To retrospectively review a small series of infant neuroblastoma (NBL) in a single Saudi medical institution over 10 years, including their presentation, management, and outcomes. **Methods:** Fifty-three subjects aged 0 to 14 years with previously untreated NBL who were diagnosed and treated at Princess Nora Oncology Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between 2010 and 2019. Six infants (11.3%) had stage 4S characteristics. **Results:** The median age at diagnosis was 3 months (range 52 days - 4 months). Biopsies confirmed that the adrenal gland was the primary tumor site for 3 patients, while the other 2 had retroperitoneal sites. Four patients had favorable histology, and one had unfavorable histology. All patients had liver metastasis, and no bone marrow or skin metastasis was recorded. All patients received chemotherapy except one, and all survived with no disease progression at a median follow up to 5 years. **Conclusion:** Our data confirm that NBL-4S is a curable cancer, especially with early recognition and intervention. Chemotherapy is the first-line treatment for symptomatic patients. Unless the condition is life threatening, radiotherapy is not indicated. Surgical resection may be indicated in younger infants with localized tumors and favorable biology, but otherwise, it is not usually indicated for residual cases. Keywords: * neuroblastoma * International Neuroblastoma Staging System * 4S NBL (stage 4 special neuroblastoma) **N**euroblastoma (NBL) is an embryonal tumor of the sympathetic nervous system that arises from the neural crest. It is the most common extracranial solid tumor during infancy and accounts for 7% of all childhood cancer diagnoses. Disease staging is an important prognostic factor and is used for risk stratification and treatment assignment. Stage 4s is defined as patients <12 months old with localized primary tumor, stage 1 or 2, and distant metastasis limited to the bone marrow, liver, or skin. It has excellent outcomes, and some patients develop spontaneous regression. Large tumors may cause life-threatening compression of the lungs, kidneys, intestines, and inferior vena cava. In symptomatic cases, chemotherapy can be used for active regression and treatment. Asymptotic cases can be monitored by regular clinical, biochemical, and serial radiologic evaluations. We aimed to analyze the clinical presentation, age at onset, outcome of infants diagnosed to have stage 4(s) NBL and to compare with others. ## Methods The electronic data of 53 patients with NBL were retrospectively reviewed to identify cases of NBL (4S). The patients were selected from those who were diagnosed and treated at Princess Nora Oncology Center (PNOC), King Abdul-Aziz Medical City (KAMC), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, from January 2010 to December 2019. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were examined. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ethic committee of KAMC. The NBL patients were diagnosed based on the results of histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular biology examinations (N-MYC, DNA ploidy, 1p and q 11 deletion, MKI) after surgical excision or open biopsy with reference to the onset age of <12 months. Staging was based on the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System (INRGSS) before surgery.1 Stage 4s disease was defined as local stage 1 or 2 with metastases isolated to the liver, skin, or bone marrow in an infant younger than 12 months of age. Tumor response was assessed using the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC).2 Patients were mainly treated with chemotherapy according to the children’s oncology group (COG) ANBL1232 protocol, as shown in Table 1. None of the patients had surgery for residual disease (cases 4 and 6). View this table: [Table 1](http://smj.org.sa/content/42/12/1353/T1) Table 1 - Chemotherapy schedules for symptomatic infant neuroblastoma (4S). ## Result Out of 53 retrospectively reviewed files, 6 patients (11%) were diagnosed with stage 4s NBL, and 4 patients were female. The median age at diagnosis was 3 months (range 52 days - 4 months). Biopsies confirmed that the adrenal gland was the primary tumor site for 3 patients, while the other 2 had retroperitoneal sites. For one patient, the diagnosis was made using clinical progressive hepatomegaly, respiratory distress, and radiological findings. Later, pathology results from the hepatic lesion revealed a poorly differentiated, non-amplified N-MYC pathology. There were 4 patients with favorable histology and 2 with unfavorable histology. None of the N-MYC results were amplified. All patients had liver metastasis, and no bone marrow or skin metastasis was recorded. All patients survived with no disease progression at a median follow up to 5 years. The patients’ characteristics and outcomes are shown in Table 2. View this table: [Table 2](http://smj.org.sa/content/42/12/1353/T2) Table 2 - Patient’s characteristics, treatment plan, and outcome. One patient did not require any medical or surgical intervention, while 5 patients received chemotherapy based on the clinical situation and Philadelphia clinical score for 4s NBL disease. The chemotherapy protocol used for the 5 patients was ANBL 1232, based on which 3 patients received 8 cycles, and 2 patients received 4 cycles, they showed complete clinical and radiological resolutions. The decision on the number of cycles was based on the patient’s clinical condition and radiological response (mainly in computed tomography scans). All patients have survived, although 2 of them have a residual tumor that was <10% of the initial tumor mass size and required no secondary surgical intervention. ## Discussion Stage 4s NBL is a special infant tumor that represents 5% of NBL cases.3 It has been established as having a significantly better prognosis than historical results with International Neuroblastoma Staging System stage 4 NBL in children. The P9641 and COG A3961 trials of the COG confirmed that excellent results are obtained for patients with low risk, including those with stage 4s and intermediate-risk disease. The 5-year event-free survival rate was 89%, and the over survival rate was 97%.4,5 With only surgery, a younger infant (<6 months) with localized disease and favorable biology had an even better outcome. In 2012, COG prospectively reported that 87 localized NBL cases involving patients <6 months old had a >90% 3-year survival rate after surgery only and observation.6 This was recently confirmed by an Italian NBL group, which showed that patients who underwent early tumor resection were associated with better outcomes.7 Even though the majority of patients present with metastasis, some of them have spontaneous regression, but 10-20% of infants do not survive due to early complications, which is mainly the result of massive hepatomegaly, renal obstruction, and coagulopathy.8-10 There are no clear guidelines regarding the justification to start chemotherapy or the choice of combination regimens. We utilized chemotherapy as a first-line modality in 5 patients (cases 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6), which proved to be effective and was well tolerated. Clinical data suggest that the combination of carboplatin and etoposide is preferable as a first-line treatment, and a more intense chemotherapy or radiotherapy should be used for refractory cases.11 Only one infant who required no intervention and displayed a complete resolution of primary and metastatic tumors, while the other 2 (cases 4 and 6) continue to have a residual tumor after 8 months since the initial diagnosis, but they remain asymptomatic. None of our patients required urgent radiotherapy or surgical intervention. In addition, none of them developed spontaneous abdominal compartment syndrome during or after biopsy. All patients survived with no disease progression at a median follow up of 5 years. Our results confirm those of a previous successful study carried out in the same institution by Najla et al.12 ### Study limitations Our case series is limited by its retrospective nature and small size number of infants included. It would be a reference for further collaborative study of collecting more patients to draw more of conclusions and strengthen the studies. In conclusion, stage 4s NBL is a distinct tumor that may undergo spontaneous regression. Chemotherapy is the first-line treatment for symptomatic patients. Unless the condition is life threatening, radiotherapy is not indicated. Surgical resection may be indicated for younger infants with localized tumor and favorable biology, but otherwise, it is not usually indicated for residual cases. ## Acknowledgment *The authors gratefully acknowledge American Manuscript Editors ([https://www.americanmanuscripteditors.com](https://www.americanmanuscripteditors.com)) for English language editing.* ## Footnotes * **Disclosure.** Authors have no conflict of interests, and the work was not supported or funded by any drug company. * Received August 20, 2021. * Accepted November 23, 2021. * Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal This is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. ## References 1. 1.Cohn SL, Pearson SDJ, London WB, Monclair T, Ambros PF, Brodeur GM, et al. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system: an INRG Task Force report. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 289–297. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiamNvIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjI3LzIvMjg5IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjA6Ii9zbWovNDIvMTIvMTM1My5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 2. 2.Park JR, Bagatell R, Cohn SL, Pearson AD, Villablanca JG, Berthold F, et al. Revisions to the international neuroblastoma response criteria: A consensus statement from the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35: 2580–2587. [CrossRef](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1200/JCO.2016.72.0177&link_type=DOI) 3. 3.D’Angio GJ, Evans AE, Koop CE. Special pattern of widespread neuroblastoma with a favourable prognosis. Lancet 1971; 1: 1046–1049. [PubMed](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=4102970&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsmj%2F42%2F12%2F1353.atom) [Web of Science](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1971J424200005&link_type=ISI) 4. 4.Strother DR, London WB, Schmidt ML, Brodeur GM, Shimada H, Thorner P, et al. Outcome after surgery alone or with restricted use of chemotherapy for patients with low-risk neuroblastoma: results of Children’s Oncology Group study P9641. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 1842–1848. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiamNvIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiIzMC8xNS8xODQyIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjA6Ii9zbWovNDIvMTIvMTM1My5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 5. 5.Baker DL, Schmidt ML, Cohn SL, Maris JM, London WB, Buxton A, et al. Outcome after reduced chemotherapy for intermediate-risk neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1313–1323. [CrossRef](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa1001527&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20879880&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsmj%2F42%2F12%2F1353.atom) [Web of Science](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000282271500005&link_type=ISI) 6. 6.Nuchtern JG, London WB, Barnewolt CE, Naranjo A, McGrady PW, Geiger JD, et al. A prospective study of expectant observation as primary therapy for neuroblastoma in young infants: a Children’s Oncology Group study. Ann Surg 2012; 256: 573–580. [CrossRef](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826cbbbd&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22964741&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsmj%2F42%2F12%2F1353.atom) 7. 7.Avanzini S, Buffoni I, Gigliotti AR, Parodi S, Paraboschi I, Inserra A, et al. Resection of primary tumor in stage 4S neuroblastoma: a second study by the Italian Neuroblastoma Group. Pediatr Surg Int 2021; 37: 37–47. 8. 8.Taggart DR, London WB, Schmidt ML, DuBois SG, Monclair TF, Nakagawara A, et al. Prognostic value of the stage 4S metastatic pattern and tumor biology in patients with metastatic neuroblastoma diagnosed between birth and 18 months of age. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 4358–4364. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiamNvIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiIyOS8zMy80MzU4IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjA6Ii9zbWovNDIvMTIvMTM1My5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 9. 9.Nickerson HJ, Matthay KK, Seeger RC, Broduer Gm, Shimada H, Prez C, et al., Favorable biology and outcome of stage IV-S neuroblastoma with supportive care or minimal therapy: a Children’s Cancer Group study. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 477–786. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiamNvIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjE4LzMvNDc3IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjA6Ii9zbWovNDIvMTIvMTM1My5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 10. 10.Hsu LL, Evans AE, D’Angio Gj. Hepatomegaly in neuroblastoma stage 4s: criteria for treatment of the vulnerable neonate. Med Pediatr Oncol 1996; 27: 521–528. [CrossRef](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/(SICI)1096-911X(199612)27:6<521::AID-MPO3>3.0.CO;2-N&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8888811&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsmj%2F42%2F12%2F1353.atom) [Web of Science](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1996VQ11000004&link_type=ISI) 11. 11.Schleiermacher G, Rubbie H, Hartman O, Bergeron C, Chastagner P, Mechinaud F, et al. Treatment of stage 4s neuroblastoma--report of 10 years’ experience of the French Society of Paediatric Oncology (SFOP). Br J Cancer 2003; 89: 470–476. [CrossRef](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/sj.bjc.6601154&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12888814&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsmj%2F42%2F12%2F1353.atom) 12. 12.Elimam NA, Atra AA, Fayea NY, Al-Asaad TG, Khattan TM, Al-Sulami GA, et al. Stage 4S neuroblastoma, a disseminated tumor with excellent outcome. Saudi Med J 2006; 27: 1734–1736. [PubMed](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17106552&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsmj%2F42%2F12%2F1353.atom)