Impact on the survival of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio, and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio on prognosis in children with Hodgkin lymphoma ============================================================================================================================================================== * Kubra Ertan * Aysenur Dogru * Buket Kara * Yavuz Koksal ## Abstract **Objectives:** To evaluate the clinical utility of the recently described absolute neutrophil counts to absolute lymphocyte counts ratio (NLR), absolute platelet counts to absolute lymphocyte counts ratio (PLR), and absolute monocyte counts to absolute lymphocyte counts ratio (MLR) on prognosis in children with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). **Methods:** We retrospectively evaluated the clinical characteristics, laboratory features (lymphocyte counts, NLR, PLR, and MLR), treatment, and results of 52 children with HL in the Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Selcuk University, konya, Turkey, from January 2006 until December 2021. **Results:** The patients included 27 (51.9%) females and 25 (48.1%) males. The age of the patients ranged between 3-17.5 years old (median: 9 years). There were 22 patients in stage II, 24 in stage III, and 6 in stage IV. The most prevalent histopathological subgroup was the nodular sclerosing type (53.8%). The 5-year overall survival rate was 93.7%. The overall survival rate differed based on lymphocyte counts (*p*<0.0001), NLR (*p*=0.018), and PLR (*p*=0.009). However, none of the prognostic factors in the univariate analysis were not prognostic risk factors (*p*>0.05) in the multivariate analysis. **Conclusion:** Lymphocyte counts, NLR, and PLR may be useful markers for determining the outcomes in children with HL. Keywords: * child * Hodgkin lymphoma * lymphocyte counts * neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio * platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio * monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio * prognosis **H**odgkin lymphoma (HL) has been a curable malignant disease since the last century. The main objectives in HL are to improve the outcome of the high-risk group, similar to those of the low- and intermediate-risk groups, and to minimize treatment-related toxicities.1 The well-known factors affecting the outcome in HL are stage, the presence of B symptoms, the presence of bulky disease, extra-nodal involvement, increased number of tumor sites, male gender, high erythrocyte sedimentation rate, anemia, and leukocytosis.2-5 The role of the immune system and its cells in the occurrence, development, course, and prognosis of malignant diseases has been known for several years and continues to attract attention. Another point in malignant disease, well known, is inflammation in the tumor tissue. The cells that play significant roles in both the immune and inflammatory response to malignant disease are specifically lymphocytes and neutrophils. Recently, some systemic inflammatory markers obtained from lymphocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, and platelets have been employed in various disease groups. These markers include absolute neutrophil counts to absolute lymphocyte counts ratio (NLR), absolute platelet counts to absolute lymphocyte counts ratio (PLR), and absolute monocyte counts to absolute lymphocyte counts ratio (MLR) and so on.6-18 However, there are few reports on the use of these markers in childhood malignant diseases. Furthermore, several studies have highlighted its effects on prognosis in children with malignant diseases.6,11-18 In a study carried out on children with reactive lymphadenopathy and children with lymphoma, the lymphoma group’s NLR, PLR, and MLR values of children with lymphoma were higher than the reactive lymphadenopathy group.6 In another study carried out on children with HL, they discovered that NLR was associated with tumor burden and B symptoms.18 This study evaluated the clinical utility of recently described NLR, PLR, and MLR on prognosis in children with HL. ## Methods From January 2006 until December 2021, we retrospectively examined 53 children with HL. Demographic and clinical features, laboratory findings, pathological diagnoses, treatment approaches (such as chemotherapy regimens and radiotherapy), and outcomes were obtained from their oncologic charts. We excluded a patient with nodular lymphocyte-predominant HL from this study. Thus, this study enrolled 52 patients diagnosed with classical HL. Patients’ age was grouped as ≤5 years, 5-10 years, and ≥10 years old. Ethical approval was obtained from Selcuk University, Faculty of Medicine Ethics Board, Konya, Turkey (2021/437). Also, the Declaration of Helsinki and principles of Good Clinical Practice was complied in this study. Within the laboratory findings, leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophil counts, and hemoglobin levels were grouped according to the lower and upper limit values for that age group.19 The high erythrocyte sedimentation rate was defined as greater than twice the laboratory upper limit of normal (>40 mm/h). Similarly, elevated lactate dehydrogenase was defined as more than twice the upper limit of normal. The NLR, PLR, and MLR were calculated from complete blood counts at the time of diagnosis. Cut-off value for NLR was 3.17, 180 for PLR, and 0.29 for MLR.6 Furthermore, we evaluated the patients using physical examination, laboratory and imaging studies (such as neck and abdominal ultrasounds; neck, chest, and abdominal computed tomography) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (after 2010). The definitive diagnosis was made by pathological examination. Bone marrow biopsy was carried out except for stage IA and IIA patients. Ann Arbor staging system was used. The patients were divided into 3 groups as low- (non-bulky stage IA or IIA disease), intermediate- (stage IB or IIB disease without bulk; bulky stage IA or bulky stage IIA disease; stage IIAE and stage IIIA, regardless of bulk), and high-risk groups (stage IIB with bulk, stage IIIB, or stage IV disease). During this period, ABVD chemotherapy regimen containing adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine ± COPP chemotherapy regimen containing cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prokabazine and prednisone; or OPPA containing vinristine, prednisone, procarbazine, and adriamycin for female patients; OEPA containing vinristine, prednisone, etoposide, and adriamycin for male patients ± the COPP protocol were used in our institute according to drug supply variations. Since 2015, the COPDac chemotherapy regimen containing cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and dacarbazine has been used instead of COPP. Involved field radiotherapy was preferred. *Statistical analysis* Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used. Frequency and percentage values were used for categorical data. If the numerical data distribution is normal, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) was given, if it is not normal, the median (mdn) value (minimum-maximum values) was given. We estimated the overall survival rates using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the prognostic factors’ effect survival differences were compared using the Mantel-Cox test (log-rank test). Then, we carried out the multivariate analysis by Cox regression method. A *p*-value of <0.05 was considered significant. ## Results This study included 52 pediatric patients with pathologically proven classical HL. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. A total of 50 patients were Turkish, while 2 were refugees from Syria, 27 (51.9%) patients were female, and 25 (48.1%) were male. The patients’ age ranged from 3-17.5 years old (Mdn: 9 years). Nearly half (46.1%) were ≥10 years old. View this table: [Table 1](http://smj.org.sa/content/43/5/451/T1) Table 1 - The patients’ demographic and clinical features. There were 22 patients in stage II, 24 in stage III, and 6 patients in stage IV Also, the low-risk group included 15 patients, the intermediate-risk groups included 16 patients, and the high-risk group included 21 patients. The most prevalent histopathological subgroup was the nodular sclerosing type (53.8%). Tables 2 & 3 show the hematological and inflammatory markers of the patients. We detected anemia in 19 (36.5%) patients, leukocytosis in 11 (21.2%) patients, leukopenia in 4 (7.6%) patients, neutrophilia in 20 (38.5%) patients, neutropenia in one (1.9%) patient, lymphopenia in 8 (15.4%) patients, and thrombocytopenia in one (1.9%)patient. View this table: [Table 2](http://smj.org.sa/content/43/5/451/T2) Table 2 - The patients’ hematological parameters. View this table: [Table 3](http://smj.org.sa/content/43/5/451/T3) Table 3 - The changes of lymphocyte count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratios according to clinical and laboratory features. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio of all patients ranged from 0.46-56.5 (mdn: 2.78). The NLR of 29 patients were ≤3.17 and 23 patients had NLR >3.17. The mdn PLR value was 156.3 (range: 9.96-2235.0). A total of 31 patients had PLR ≤180 and 21 patients had PLR >180. The patients’ MLR values ranged from 0.05-2.5 (mdn: 0.3). There were 22 patients with MLR ≤0.29 and 30 patients with MLR >0.29. *Survival analyses* The whole patients’ follow-up time ranged from 4 months until 15.7 years old, (median, 8.3 years). A total of 4 (7.5%) patients died with progressive disease. The 5-year overall survival rates as 93.7%. Table 4 shows the patients’ survival analyses according to subgroups. The overall survival rate differed based on lymphocyte counts (*p*<0.0001), NLR (*p*=0.018), and PLR (*p*=0.009). However, by Cox regression analysis, it was revealed that tumor lymphocyte counts, NLR, and PLR, which are all prognostic factors in univariate analysis, were not prognostic risk factors (*p*>0.05). View this table: [Table 4](http://smj.org.sa/content/43/5/451/T4) Table 4 - Evaluation of the factors effect on survival analyzes. ## Discussion Hodgkin lymphoma, originating from lymphocytes, is a malignant disease that has attracted a lot of attention from many researchers for many years and continues to attract attention. Recently, improvements in the treatment outcomes of HL, especially a decrease in long-term side effects, have been achieved with risk- and response-based treatment approaches. Early response to treatment (favorable prognostic factor); pre-treatment factors, including advanced stage (stage III and IV), the presence of B symptoms, the presence of bulky disease, extra-nodal extension, male gender, the presence of high erythrocyte sedimentation rate, anemia, high leukocyte counts, and some serum markers are well known prognostic factors in HL.2-5 This study evaluated the clinical utility of recently described NLR, PLR, and MLR on prognosis in children with HL. The immune system and inflammation in HL have been known for many years and have attracted a lot of attention from many researchers. The hematological abnormalities in HL are anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutrophilia or neutropenia, eosinophilia, and lymphopenia.2 Lymphopenia in HL has been known for a long time. The frequency of lymphopenia in HL is highly variable and has been known to be between 6.4-20.7%.20-24 Although the above-mentioned prognostic factors are not so emphasized in HL, studies have shown the prognostic significance of lymphopenia, but the experience in children was unfortunately not as much as in adults. In all these studies, lymphopenia was seen as an unfavorable prognostic factor.20-24 In our study, the frequency of lymphopenia, defined as being below the lower limit for that age group, was 15.1%. Furthermore, when the effect of lymphopenia on overall survival rates was investigated, the overall survival rates of children with normal lymphocyte counts was 96.8% and 60.0% with lymphopenia, and the difference was statistically significant. Although it was not seen as a risk factor in the multivariate analysis in our study, lymphopenia was discovered to be a risk factor in the multivariate analysis in a study by Bhethanabhotla et al.23 Recently, NLR is a marker employed in different disease groups, especially some rheumatologic and malignant diseases. These are studies that sometimes help in disease diagnosis and indicate their relationship with the severity of the disease.8-16 There is more experience on this subject in adulthood. While the NLR and PLR values of both pediatric and adult patients with osteosarcoma were statistically higher than the control group, the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio was lower than the control group. In a previous study, they emphasized that the elevation of these biomarkers was a factor that negatively affected the overall survival rate.11 Another study in patients with osteosarcoma demonstrated the prognostic significance of NLR.13 In a study carried out in pediatric and adult patients with medulloblastoma, increased preoperative NLR and PLR were unfavorable prognostic factors, and no effect of preoperative MLR on prognosis was detected.14 Similarly, NLR was significantly associated with prognosis in pediatric patients with parotid cancer.15 However, in neuroblastoma, the authors determined no predictive value of NLR, PLR, and MLR on the overall survival rate.12 In our study, NLR, PLR, and MLR values of patients with B symptoms were higher than those without B symptoms. While the lymphocyte counts were lower in patients with bulky disease, NLR and PLR values were found to be higher. Another feature was that while the lymphocyte counts were lower in dead patients, NLR, PLR, and MLR values were higher. As the effect on survival analysis was examined, these markers did not affect event-free survival. However, in univariate analysis, we discovered that low lymphocyte counts, and high NLR and PLR values had an unfavorable effect on overall survival rates. Cox regression analysis revealed that tumor lymphocyte counts, NLR, and PLR, which are all prognostic factors in univariate analysis, are not prognostic risk factors. The lymphocyte count plays a critical role in the changes in NLR, PLR, and MLR. Vasquez et al17 emphasized that in pediatric patients with sarcoma, absolute lymphocyte count recovery and NLR were independent prognostic factors. ### Study limitation The significant limitation in this study is the small number of dead patients and the low number of patients, especially in the subgroups. In conclusion, the change in lymphocyte count, NLR, PLR, and MLR may be related to the reflection of the immune system and inflammation, which contributes to cancer development and behavior. These markers can help predict prognosis in children with HL. However, larger pediatric studies are needed. ## Acknowledgment *The authors gratefully acknowledge all the medical doctors and healthcare team who contributed to the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of the children with Hodgkin lymphoma over the years in the Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Selcuk University, konya, Turkey. We would also like to thank Enago ([www.enago.com.tr](https://www.enago.com.tr)) for English language editing.* ## Footnotes * **Disclosure.** Authors have no conflict of interests, and the work was not supported or funded by any drug company. * Received January 19, 2022. * Accepted April 10, 2022. * Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal This is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. ## References 1. 1.Lo AC, Dieckmann K, Pelz T, Gallop-Evans E, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Vordermark D, et al. Pediatric classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68: e28562. 2. 2.Firedman DL. Hodgkin lymphoma. In: Lanzkowsky’s manual of pediatric hematology and oncology (sixth edition). ScienceDirect 2016: 429–441. 3. 3.Büyükpamukçu M, Varan A, Akyüz C, Atahan L, Ozyar E, Kale G, et al. The treatment of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma: improved survival in a developing country. Acta Oncol 2009; 48: 44–51. [CrossRef](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/02841860802310991&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18777215&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsmj%2F43%2F5%2F451.atom) 4. 4.Karhan AN, Varan A, Akyüz C, Aydın B, Yalçın B, Kutluk T, et al. Outcome of 102 patients under 5 years of age with Hodgkin lymphoma. Arch Argent Pediatr 2019; 117: e459–e465. 5. 5.Büyükkapu-Bay S, Çorapçıoğlu F, Aksu G, Anık Y, Demir H, Erçin C. Prognostic factors and treatment results of pediatric Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a single center experience. Turk J Pediatr 2015; 57: 359–366. 6. 6.Tezol O, Bozlu G, Sagcan F, Tuncel Daloglu F, Citak C. Value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and red blood cell distribution width in distinguishing between reactive lymphadenopathy and lymphoma in children. Bratisl Lek Listy 2020; 121: 287–292. 7. 7.Çolak M, Eravcı FC, Karakurt SE, Karakuş MF, İkincioğulları A, Özcan KM. The predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for Hodgkin’s lymphoma diagnosis in patients with asymptomatic cervical lymphadenopathy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 71: 986–991. 8. 8.Aryani IGAD, Yantie NPVK, Gunawijaya E, Gustawan IW. Correlation between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and mean platelet volume with severity of carditis in children with rheumatic fever. Cardiol Young 2021: 1–5. 9. 9.Kim WK, Kim CJ, Yang EM. Risk factors for renal involvement in Henoch-Schönlein purpura. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2021; 97: 646–650. 10. 10.Zhong X, Ma A, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Liang G. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive marker for severe pediatric sepsis. Transl Pediatr 2021; 10: 657–665. 11. 11.Yapar A, Tokgöz MA, Yapar D, Atalay İB, Ulucaköy C, Güngör BŞ. Diagnostic and prognostic role of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio in patients with osteosarcoma. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2021; 32: 489–496. 12. 12.Zheng C, Liu S, Feng J, Zhao X. Prognostic value of inflammation biomarkers for survival of patients with neuroblastoma. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12: 2415–2425. 13. 13.Yang Q, Chen T, Yao Z, Zhang X. Prognostic value of pre-treatment Naples prognostic score (NPS) in patients with osteosarcoma. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18: 24. 14. 14.Li K, Duan WC, Zhao HB, Wang L, Wang WW, Zhan YB, et al. Preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio are associated with the prognosis of group 3 and group 4 medulloblastoma. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 13239. 15. 15.Seng D, Fang Q, Li P, Liu F, Liu S. Prognostic value of the pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in pediatric parotid cancer. Front Pediatr 2019; 7: 207. 16. 16.Yalon M, Toren A, Jabarin D, Fadida E, Constantini S, Mehrian-Shai R. Elevated NLR may be a feature of pediatric brain cancer patients. Front Oncol 2019; 9: 327. 17. 17.Vasquez L, León E, Beltran B, Maza I, Oscanoa M, Geronimo J. Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte recovery: independent prognostic factors for survival in pediatric sarcomas. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2017; 39: 538–546. 18. 18.Jan S, Mustafa O, Elgaml A, Ahmad N, Abbas A, Althubaiti S. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and ferritin as measurable tools for disease burden and B symptoms in pediatric patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2022; 44: e567–e571. 19. 19.Lanzkowsky P, Lipton JM, Fish JD. Hematological reference values. Elsevier 2016: 709–731. 20. 20.Hancock BW, Dunsmore IR, Swan HT. Lymphopenia: a bad prognostic factor in Hodgkin’s disease. Scand J Haematol 1982; 29: 193–199. [PubMed](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7146822&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsmj%2F43%2F5%2F451.atom) 21. 21.Ayoub JP, Palmer JL, Huh Y, Cabanillas F, Younes A. Therapeutic and prognostic implications of peripheral blood lymphopenia in patients with Hodgkin’s disease. Leuk Lymphoma 1999; 34: 519–527. [CrossRef](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3109/10428199909058479&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10492075&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsmj%2F43%2F5%2F451.atom) [Web of Science](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000082619100011&link_type=ISI) 22. 22.Baharvand M, Mortazavi H. Characteristics of Hodgkin lymphoma in a defined group of Iranian pediatric patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014; 15: 5167–5169. 23. 23.Bhethanabhotla S, Jain S, Kapoor G, Mahajan A, Chopra A, Vishnubhatla S, et al. Outcome of pediatric advanced Hodgkin lymphoma treated with ABVD and predictors of inferior survival: a multicenter study of 186 patients. Leuk Lymphoma 2017; 58: 1617–1623. 24. 24.Zhu YJ, Sun YL, Xia Y, Jiang WQ, Huang JJ, Huang HQ, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in Chinese patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Med Oncol 2012; 29: 1127–1133. [PubMed](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21390515&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsmj%2F43%2F5%2F451.atom)