Epidemiology, clinical profiles, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica infections ============================================================================================================== * Raghad T. Alhuthil * Raghad M. Hijazi * Ohoud A. Alyabes * Mohammed A. Alsuhaibani * Deema A. Gashgarey * Ibrahim M. Binsalamah * Mohammed A. Aldahmash * Salem M. Alghamdi * Esam A. Albanyan * Suliman A. Aljumaah * Sami H. Al-Hajjar ## Insights from a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia ## Abstract **Objectives:** To investigate the incidence rate, clinical characteristics across different age groups, antimicrobial susceptibility, and outcomes of *Elizabethkingia meningoseptica* (*E. meningoseptica*) infections. **Methods:** A retrospective analysis was carried out to include 66 cases with confirmed *E. meningoseptica* cultures from sterile samples between January 2014 and June 2022 at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. **Results:** A total of 66 cases were identified, with an incidence rate of 0.3 per 1000 admissions. Most cases were hospital-acquired (80.3%), primarily in critical care areas. All patients had underlying diseases, with respiratory (40.9%) and cardiovascular (39.4%) diseases being the most common. Minocycline showed the highest susceptibility (96.0%), followed by trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (77.0%), whereas tobramycin and colistin were fully resistant. The in-hospital mortality rate was 34.8%, whereas the 28-day mortality rate was 22.7%. Clinical characteristics across age groups showed a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease in pediatrics than in adults, whereas exposure to mechanical ventilation, immunosuppressive therapy, previous infection, anemia, and in-hospital mortality were reported more frequently in adults (*p*<0.05). **Conclusion:** Our study provides valuable insights into *E. meningoseptica* infection in Saudi Arabia, emphasizing the importance of robust infection control measures. Incidence and mortality rates align with global trends. Variations in clinical characteristics across age groups highlight the importance of tailored treatments based on patient demographics and underlying comorbidities. Keywords: * *E. meningoseptica* * *Elizabethkingia* * hospital-acquired infection * multidrug resistance ***E**lizabethkingia meningoseptica* (*E. meningoseptica*), formerly recognized as *Chryseobacterium meningosepticum* or *Flavobacterium meningosepticum*, is a gram-negative rod characterized by its aerobic, non-motile, non-fermenting nature, absence of spore formation, and multidrug resistance.1 This bacterium is widely distributed in various environmental sources such as water bodies, fish, soils, insects, and amphibians, as well as frequently encountered in healthcare settings, where it can contaminate medical devices and solutions used for flushing.1,2 Currently, the *Elizabethkingia* genus comprises 6 species: *E. meningoseptica*, *E. miricola*, *E. anophelis*, *E. bruuniana*, *E. ursingii*, and *E. occulta*, with *E. meningoseptica* being recognized as the most pathogenic among them.2-4 A study by Choi et al5 carried out in South Korea stated that the incidence rate of *Elizabethkingia* species increased significantly from 0.02 in 2009 to 0.88 in 2017 per 1,000 admissions. In addition, a study by Ma et al6 carried out in China reported a rapid increase in the prevalence rate of *E. meningoseptica* from 0 in 2011 to 0.19 in 2019 per 1000 inpatients. Infections associated with *E. meningoseptica* primarily occur in patients with indwelling medical devices such as mechanical ventilation.5 Being an opportunistic pathogen, *E. meningoseptica* has the ability to form biofilms, enabling it to endure for prolonged periods in moist or aquatic environments, including tap water.7 Nevertheless, a study by Nori et al8 indicated that *E. meningoseptica* infection is associated with the COVID-19 virus. Furthermore, some studies have reported that *Elizabethkingia* species infect not only immunocompromised individuals but also immunocompetent individuals.9-11 Given its significance as a nosocomial pathogen, accurate identification of *E. meningoseptica* is crucial for clinical diagnosis and subsequent treatment decisions.12 Moreover, due to its inherent resistance to commonly used antibiotics such as aminoglycosides and β-lactams, *E. meningoseptica* infections pose a significant challenge in terms of treatment, often resulting in high mortality rates.1,13 In Saudi Arabia, limited studies have been published regarding *E. meningoseptica* infection, and the majority were case reports, case series, or investigations with relatively small sample sizes.4,14-20 Therefore, this study reports a considerable number of cases with *E. meningoseptica* infection over nearly 9 years (2014-2022). The study aims to explore several key aspects related to *E. meningoseptica*, including the incidence rate, clinical characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibility, and outcomes of *E. meningoseptica* infections at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia. ## Methods This retrospective single-center study was carried out at King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. It is a tertiary referral hospital offering general and highly specialized inpatient and outpatient medical treatment, transplantation, and oncology services. All patients, with a confirmed culture of *E. meningoseptica* from sterile samples, including blood, drainage fluid, tracheal aspirate, urine, vascular tip, and wound culture, between January 2014 and June 2022 were included in the study. Both pediatric and adult patients were included. In our hospital practice, the pediatric population comprises individuals up to 14 years of age, while adults are defined as those aged above 14 years. Patients with missing documentation were excluded. The study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the ethics committee of King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (reference number: 2231011 and date of approval: 19/01/2023). Data were gathered by chart review and then stored in REDCap (10.8.0 - © 2021 Vanderbilt University). The extracted data included demographic information, medical history, investigations, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, antibiotic susceptibility, and outcomes. Hospital-acquired or healthcare-associated infection was documented if it occurred >48 hours after admission to the healthcare facility.21 In addition, previous infection, antimicrobial use, and interventions such as ventilation were defined as occurring within 30 days prior to *Elizabethkingia* infection. *Elizabethkingia* species were identified using the VITEK® 2 (bioMérieux, located in Marcy-l’Étoile, France). Gram-Negative Card 292 was used to determine antibiotic susceptibility. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI M100) recommendations were used to interpret zone dimensions for classification as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant.22 Furthermore, leukopenia was defined as white blood count <4.5×109/L, thrombocytopenia as platelet count <150×109/L, neutropenia as an absolute neutrophil count <1.5×109/L, and anemia as hemoglobin (Hb) concentration <12.5 g/dL in adults, <11 g/dL in children aged 6 months to 6 years, and <12 g/dL in children aged 6-14 years. ### Statistical analysis Data analysis was carried out using STATA, version 18 (College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC). Categorical variables were reported as frequencies and percentages (%), and continuous variables as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) due to a lack of normality assumption using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. In addition, Fisher’s exact test was used to compare clinical characteristics across age groups (pediatrics age ≤14 years versus adults age >14 years). Graphs were generated in Microsoft Excel 2016. ## Results A total of 66 patients with *E. meningoseptica* infection were identified from January 2014 to June 2022, with overall incidence rate of 0.3 per 1000 admissions (66/204,426), the peak incidence was noted in 2016 with a rate of 1 per 1000 admissions (20/20,514), then it was gradually decreased to 0.1 per 1000 admissions in June 2022 (2/22,625, Table 1). Of these, 31 (47.0%) were females. Regarding age, 35 (53.0%) were pediatrics (aged ≤14 years) with a median age of 0.4 years (IQR: 0.25-2), and 31 (47.0%) were adults (aged ≥15 years) with a median age of 51 years (IQR: 36-62, Table 2). View this table: [Table 1](http://smj.org.sa/content/45/8/840/T1) Table 1 - The incidence of *Elizabethkingia meningoseptica* over the years (2014-mid 2022). View this table: [Table 2](http://smj.org.sa/content/45/8/840/T2) Table 2 - Characteristics of study participants (N=66). The origin of infection indicated that 13 (19.7%) cases were community-acquired, whereas the majority (53 [80.3%] cases) were hospital-acquired. Among hospital-acquired infections, the majority (98.1%) occurred in critical care areas such as the intensive care unit (ICU), operating room (OR), or emergency room (ER, Table 2). Many patients had previous hospitalization (72.7%), infections (57.6%), and antimicrobial use (83.3%) within one month prior to *E. meningoseptica* infection (Table 2). Remarkably, all 66 patients had underlying diseases (100%). The most reported primary diagnosis was respiratory disease (40.9%), followed by cardiovascular disease (39.4%), immunodeficiency, and liver disease (24.2%), hematological/oncological diseases (21.2%), and renal disease (18.2%). Furthermore, 10.6% had a stem cell transplant, and 19.7% had a solid organ transplant. Immunocompromising therapies such as immunosuppressant therapy was reported in 30.3% and chemotherapy was reported in 10.6% of patients (Table 2). Moreover, 55 of the 66 (83.3%) patients had received previous interventions within one month before the episode; of them, 85.4% had arterial/central line insertion, 74.5% were on mechanical ventilation, 58.2% had urinary catheterization, 45.4% had nasogastric tube placement, 23.6% underwent heart surgeries, 16.4% were on hemodialysis, and 9.1% underwent cardiac catheterization (Figure 1). ![Figure 1](http://smj.org.sa/https://smj.org.sa/content/smj/45/8/840/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1](http://smj.org.sa/content/45/8/840/F1) Figure 1 - Previous interventions within one-month prior the infection (n=55). Of the total cases, 7.6% had *E. meningoseptica* colonized infection, whereas the majority (92.4%) presented with an active infection. Among the active infection cases, various symptoms were reported, with fever being the most common (32.8%), followed by respiratory distress (45.9%), tachycardia (34.4%), hypotension (23%), lethargy (18%), and gastrointestinal symptoms (6.6%, Table 2). The most common source used in isolating *E. meningoseptica* in our series was tracheal aspirate (77.3%). Furthermore, 42 (63.6%) patients had polymicrobial infections at the time of the episode; of them, 40 (95.2%) had a bacterial infection, including gram-positive bacterial infection in 6 patients (*Enterococcus*, *Staphylococcus*) and gram-negative bacterial infection in the remaining 36 patients (gram-negative rods, *Pseudomonas*, *Stenotrophomonas*, *Acinetobacter*, *Enterobacter*, *Chryseobacterium*, *Escherichia coli*, *Klebsiella*, and *Serratia*). Lastly, 12 (28.6%) patients had a fungal infection (*Candida* species). Notably, 10 patients had both fungal and bacterial infections (Table 3). View this table: [Table 3](http://smj.org.sa/content/45/8/840/T3) Table 3 - Investigations and hospital course. Laboratory results revealed a high prevalence of anemia (81.8%) and thrombocytopenia (48.5%). Elevated procalcitonin levels (>0.25 ng/mL) were observed in 53.5% of cases, whereas C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (>50 mg/L) were elevated in 27.3% of cases (Table 3). In terms of antibiotic susceptibility, minocycline had the highest susceptibility (96.0%), followed by trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (77.0%) and ciprofloxacin (75.0%). In contrast, *E. meningoseptica* was resistant to most antibiotics, including tobramycin (100%), colistin (100%), amikacin (98%), ceftazidime (97%), cefepime (97%), imipenem (96%), meropenem (95%), gentamicin (92%), and piperacillin/tazobactam (90%, Figure 2). ![Figure 2](http://smj.org.sa/https://smj.org.sa/content/smj/45/8/840/F2.medium.gif) [Figure 2](http://smj.org.sa/content/45/8/840/F2) Figure 2 - The antibiotic susceptibility of *Elizabethkingia meningoseptica* isolates. A total of 43 (65.2%) patients received targeted antimicrobial treatment for the episode, with a median treatment duration of 20 days (IQR: 14-29). The most prescribed antimicrobial agents were ciprofloxacin (46.5%) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (23.3%) (Table 3). Outcomes varied, with 59.1% of patients recovering, 34.8% succumbing to the infection, 3.0% exhibiting a relapse infection (while on treatment), and 3.0% exhibiting recurrence of the infection within one month. The in-hospital mortality rate was 34.8% (23/66 patients), with a median duration of 17 (IQR: 5-41) days from infection to death. The 28-day mortality rate was 22.7% (Table 3). The majority of clinical characteristics did not significantly differ across age groups. However, cardiovascular disease was twice as high in pediatrics than in adults (51.4% vs. 25.8%; *p*<0.05), whereas exposure to mechanical ventilation (80.6% vs. 45.7%), immunosuppressive therapy (51.6% vs. 11.4%), previous infection (74.2% vs. 42.9%), anemia (93.5% vs. 71.4%), and in-hospital mortality (54.8% vs. 17.1%) were more frequently reported in adults than in pediatrics (*p*<0.05, Table 4). View this table: [Table 4](http://smj.org.sa/content/45/8/840/T4) Table 4 - Clinical characteristics by age group (N=66). ## Discussion The emergence of *E. meningoseptica* as a significant nosocomial pathogen has raised concerns globally, particularly due to its inherent resistance to common antibiotics and association with high mortality rates. This retrospective study, carried out over nearly 9 years, aimed to shed light on various aspects of *E. meningoseptica* infection, including its incidence rate, clinical characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibility, and mortality rate. The study highlights the clinical importance of *E. meningoseptica* infections, with an overall incidence rate of 0.3 per 1000 admissions, mainly being hospital-acquired. Interestingly, the highest incidence rate was observed in 2016 (1 per 1000 admissions), then gradually decreased to (0.1 per 1000 admissions) in mid-2022, which could be explained by the increase of infection control precautions in our center post-COVID-19. Thus, our overall incidence rate aligns with those of similar studies reporting annual incidences of *E. meningoseptica* ranging from 0.007-0.399 cases per 1,000 admissions.23,24 Moreover, Choi et al5 stated that the incidence rate of *Elizabethkingia* species increased significantly from 2009 (0.02) to 2017 (0.88) per 1,000 admissions during 2009-2017, with mechanical ventilation being a significant risk factor. Similarly, in our study, a significant proportion of adult patients had a history of prior mechanical ventilation exposure (within one month prior to the infection). Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with *E. meningoseptica* infection revealed that pediatrics comprised a substantial portion of the series, with respiratory and cardiovascular diseases being the most prevalent underlying conditions in this population. Moreover, previous studies have reported that the majority of patients with *Elizabethkingia* infections have underlying chronic conditions such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, renal disease, and liver cirrhosis.25 Additionally, cardiovascular disease was significantly associated with *E. meningoseptica* infection in the pediatric group in this study, whereas previous infection, immunosuppressive therapy, and anemia were significantly reported in adult patients. This emphasizes the need for heightened surveillance and infection prevention strategies among high-risk populations. Additionally, a significant proportion of patients had a history of previous hospitalization, infections, and antimicrobial use within one month prior to the *E. meningoseptica* infection. Moreover, most cases in the study had an active infection, with only 7.6% having a colonized infection of *E. meningoseptica*. In contrast, a retrospective study by Alyami et al4 investigated *Chryseobacterium*/*Elizabethkingia* species infections in 27 patients at Prince Sultan Military Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and reported a hospital-acquired infection in 92.5%, colonization rate in 22.2%, previous hospitalization within 90 days prior to the infection in 33.3%, and a 28-day mortality rate of 11.0%. The reason for the difference in findings could be that most of our patients were critically ill and had previously underwent multiple hospitalizations. Moreover, laboratory investigations demonstrated common hematological abnormalities such as anemia and thrombocytopenia, along with elevated inflammatory markers. Similarly, a retrospective study by Li et al26 investigated *E. meningoseptica* infections among 24 patients at a tertiary care center in China and reported anemia in 75%, hypoproteinemia in 75%, elevated CRP in 66.7%, neutrophilia in 54.2%, and leukocytosis in 50.0%. These findings are indicative of the systemic nature of *E. meningoseptica* infections. The antimicrobial susceptibility profile in this study revealed limited treatment options, with some variability observed in the susceptibility of different antibiotics. Notably, minocycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole showed the highest susceptibility, suggesting their potential utility in the management of *E. meningoseptica* infections. Furthermore, the antibiotic resistance profile of *Elizabethkingia spp.* is characterized by intrinsic resistance to several antibiotic classes due to the presence of unique metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) and extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs).27-29 Notably, *Elizabethkingia spp.* possess multiple chromosomally encoded MBLs, distinguishing them from other bacteria.30 Reports indicate resistance to β-lactams, aminoglycosides, macrolides, and vancomycin, with variable susceptibility to other antibiotics such as fluoroquinolones, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.2,28,31-33 However, susceptibility testing is challenging due to the lack of established minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoints, necessitating alternative methods such as broth microdilution for accurate determination.2,13 Despite anecdotal success with vancomycin, its efficacy is uncertain, prompting recommendations for combination therapy involving ciprofloxacin, linezolid, or rifampicin.13 Whole-genome sequencing has revealed a multitude of antibiotic resistance genes in *Elizabethkingia spp.*, offering insights into their resistance mechanisms.28,29 Nevertheless, genomic studies from the Middle East on *Elizabethkingia spp.* are lacking, highlighting the need for further research in this region. Despite treatment efforts, the 28-day mortality rate in this study was 22.7%, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 34.8%. Notably, the in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in adults, highlighting the challenges in managing this pathogen among adult patients. Similarly, Seong et al34 reported a 28-day mortality rate of 25.2% among patients with *Elizabethkingia* infections, with a mean age of 66.5 years in their study cohort. Moreover, a systematic review by Ma et al6 revealed that the fatality rate associated with *E. meningoseptica* infection varied between 11.0-66.6%. After accounting for the influence of limited sample size, mortality rates fell within the range of 23.4-65.6% across 5 studies encompassing over 30 patients.6 However, it is unclear whether *E. meningoseptica* infection or the underlying disease was the cause of death in our study and other studies. Thus, the comparison of clinical characteristics across age groups revealed some interesting differences, particularly in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease and the utilization of mechanical ventilation and immunosuppressive therapy. These findings underscore the importance of tailoring treatment approaches based on patient age and underlying comorbidities. ### Study limitations Although this study reported a considerable number of *E. meningoseptica* infection cases, its retrospective and single-center design inevitably constrain its generalizability. In conclusion, our study provides valuable insights into the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of *E. meningoseptica* infections at a tertiary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Aligning with global trends, the incidence rate of *E. meningoseptica* infection in this study was 0.3 per 1000 admissions, with most cases being hospital-acquired, emphasizing the importance of robust infection control measures. Laboratory investigations revealed common hematological abnormalities and elevated inflammatory markers, indicative of the systemic nature of *E. meningoseptica* infections. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed limited treatment options, including trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or minocycline, highlighting the challenges in managing these infections. The mortality rates were substantial, aligning with the findings of other studies, particularly among adults. Variations in clinical characteristics across age groups highlight the importance of tailored treatment approaches based on patient demographics and underlying comorbidities. Further research, particularly genomic studies, is warranted to better understand the antibiotic resistance mechanisms and improve treatment strategies for *E. meningoseptica* infections in the Middle East region. ## Acknowledgment *The authors gratefully acknowledge the ContentConcepts company for their English language editing.* ## Footnotes * **Disclosure.** Authors have no conflict of interests, and the work was not supported or funded by any drug company. * Received April 1, 2024. * Accepted July 4, 2024. * Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal This is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. ## References 1. 1.Lau SK, Chow WN, Foo CH, Curreem SO, Lo GC, Teng JL, et al. *Elizabethkingia anophelis* bacteremia is associated with clinically significant infections and high mortality. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 26045. [CrossRef](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/srep26045&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27185741&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsmj%2F45%2F8%2F840.atom) 2. 2.Lin JN, Lai CH, Yang CH, Huang YH. *Elizabethkingia* infections in humans: from genomics to clinics. Microorganisms 2019; 7: 295. 3. 3.Lin JN, Lai CH, Yang CH, Huang YH. Comparison of clinical manifestations, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and mutations of fluoroquinolone target genes between *Elizabethkingia meningoseptica* and *Elizabethkingia anophelis* isolated in Taiwan. J Clin Med 2018; 7: 538. 4. 4.Alyami AM, Kaabia NM, AlQasim MA, Al Doghaim FS, Albehlal LB, Ahmed MA, et al. *Chryseobacterium/Elizabethkingia* species infections in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2020; 41: 309-313. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Mzoic21qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjQxLzMvMzA5IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MTg6Ii9zbWovNDUvOC84NDAuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 5. 5.Choi MH, Kim M, Jeong SJ, Choi JY, Lee IY, Yong TS, et al. Risk factors for *Elizabethkingia* acquisition and clinical characteristics of patients, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis 2019; 25: 42-51. [CrossRef](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3201/eid2501.171985&link_type=DOI) 6. 6.Ma S, Gong Y, Luo X, Peng Y, Zhang C, Zhang X, et al. Emerging prevalence and clinical features of *Elizabethkingia meningoseptica* infection in Southwest China: a 9-year retrospective study and systematic review. Infect Drug Resist 2023; 16: 531-543. 7. 7.Balm MN, Salmon S, Jureen R, Teo C, Mahdi R, Seetoh T, et al. Bad design, bad practices, bad bugs: frustrations in controlling an outbreak of *Elizabethkingia meningoseptica* in intensive care units. J Hosp Infect 2013; 85: 134-140. [CrossRef](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jhin.2013.05.012&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23958153&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsmj%2F45%2F8%2F840.atom) 8. 8.Nori P, Cowman K, Chen V, Bartash R, Szymczak W, Madaline T, et al. Bacterial and fungal coinfections in COVID-19 patients hospitalized during the New York City pandemic surge. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021; 42: 84-88. 9. 9.Hayek SS, Abd TT, Cribbs SK, Anderson AM, Melendez A, Kobayashi M, et al. Rare *Elizabethkingia meningosepticum meningitis* case in an immunocompetent adult. Emerg Microbes Infect 2013; 2: e17. 10. 10.Sebastiampillai BS, Luke NV, Silva S, De Silva ST, Premaratna R. Septicaemia caused by *Elizabethkingia*-sp in a ‘healthy’ Sri Lankan man. Trop Doct 2018; 48: 62-63. 11. 11.Yang C, Liu Z, Yu S, Ye K, Li X, Shen D. Comparison of 3 species of *Elizabethkingia* genus by whole-genome sequence analysis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2021; 368: fnab018. 12. 12.Zajmi A, Teo J, Yeo CC. Epidemiology and characteristics of *Elizabethkingia spp.* infections in Southeast Asia. Microorganisms 2022; 10: 882. 13. 13.Jean SS, Hsieh TC, Ning YZ, Hsueh PR. Role of vancomycin in the treatment of bacteraemia and meningitis caused by *Elizabethkingia meningoseptica*. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2017; 50: 507-511. [CrossRef](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.06.021&link_type=DOI) 14. 14.Amer MZ, Bandey M, Bukhari A, Nemenqani D. Neonatal meningitis caused by *Elizabethkingia meningoseptica* in Saudi Arabia. J Infect Dev Ctries 2011; 5: 745-747. [PubMed](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21997946&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsmj%2F45%2F8%2F840.atom) 15. 15.Musalem HM, Honjol YN, Tuleimat LM, Al Abbad SI, Alsohaibani FI. *Elizabethkingia meningoseptica* in a case of biliary tract infection following liver transplantation. Am J Case Rep 2017; 18: 1014-1019. 16. 16.Bazzi AM, Rabaan AA, Al-Tawfiq J. Microbiology of *Elizabethkingia spp.* isolates in hospitalized patients. Infez Med 2019; 27: 284-289. 17. 17.AlSehli FA, Alsaeed NS, Rajah AT, AlSaif S. Clinical course of a case of *Elizabethkingia meningoseptica* in a critical neonate at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. SJCP 2022; 1: 75-78. 18. 18.Aldoghaim FS, Kaabia N, Alyami AM, Alqasim MA, Ahmed MA, Al Aidaroos A, et al. *Elizabethkingia meningoseptica* (*Chryseobacterium meningosepticum*) bacteraemia: a series of 12 cases at Prince Sultan Military Medical City KSA. New Microbes New Infect 2019; 32: 100617. 19. 19.Barnawi AI, Kordy FN, Almuwallad OK, Kassarah KA. Early neonatal sepsis and meningitis caused by *Elizabethkingia meningoseptica* in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2020; 41: 753-756. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Mzoic21qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjQxLzcvNzUzIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MTg6Ii9zbWovNDUvOC84NDAuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 20. 20.Idrees M, Noorani MY, Altaf KU, Alatawi EA, Aba Alkhayl FF, Allemailem KS, et al. Core-proteomics-based annotation of antigenic targets and reverse-vaccinology-assisted design of ensemble immunogen against the emerging nosocomial infection-causing bacterium *Elizabethkingia meningoseptica*. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 19: 194. 21. 21.Ducel G, Fabry J, Nicolle L. Prevention of hospital-acquired infections. A practical guide. [Updated 2002; accessed 2023 Jul 6]. Available from: [https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/67350/WHO\_CDS\_CSR\_EPH\_2002.12.pdf](https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/67350/WHO\_CDS_CSR_EPH_2002.12.pdf) 22. 22.Patel J, Weinstein M, Eliopoulos G, Jenkins S, Lewis J, Limbago B, et al. M100 performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing 27th ed. [Updated 2017; accessed 2023 Jul 6]. Available from: [https://clsi.org/media/1469/m100s27\_sample.pdf](https://clsi.org/media/1469/m100s27_sample.pdf) 23. 23.Hsu MS, Liao CH, Huang YT, Liu CY, Yang CJ, Kao KL, et al. Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and outcomes of *Elizabethkingia meningoseptica* (*Chryseobacterium meningosepticum*) bacteremia at a medical center in Taiwan, 1999-2006. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2011; 30: 1271-1278. [CrossRef](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10096-011-1223-0&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21461847&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsmj%2F45%2F8%2F840.atom) 24. 24.Jean SS, Lee WS, Chen FL, Ou TY, Hsueh PR. *Elizabethkingia meningoseptica*: an important emerging pathogen causing healthcare-associated infections. J Hosp Infect 2014; 86: 244-249. [CrossRef](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jhin.2014.01.009&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24680187&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsmj%2F45%2F8%2F840.atom) 25. 25.Teo J, Tan SY, Liu Y, Tay M, Ding Y, Li Y, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of malaria mosquito vector-associated novel pathogen *Elizabethkingia anophelis*. Genome Biol Evol 2014; 6: 1158-1165. [CrossRef](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/gbe/evu094&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24803570&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsmj%2F45%2F8%2F840.atom) 26. 26.Li Y, Liu T, Shi C, Wang B, Li T, Huang Y, et al. Epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory features of patients infected with *Elizabethkingia meningoseptica* at a tertiary hospital in Hefei City, China. Front Public Health 2022; 10: 964046. 27. 27.González LJ, Vila AJ. Carbapenem resistance in *Elizabethkingia meningoseptica* is mediated by metallo-β-lactamase BlaB. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56: 1686-1692. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYWFjIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjU2LzQvMTY4NiI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjE4OiIvc21qLzQ1LzgvODQwLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 28. 28.Breurec S, Criscuolo A, Diancourt L, Rendueles O, Vandenbogaert M, Passet V, et al. Genomic epidemiology and global diversity of the emerging bacterial pathogen *Elizabethkingia anophelis*. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 30379. [CrossRef](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/srep30379&link_type=DOI) 29. 29.Teo J, Tan SY, Liu Y, Tay M, Ding Y, Li Y, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of malaria mosquito vector-associated novel pathogen *Elizabethkingia anophelis*. Genome Biol Evol 2014; 6: 1158-1165. [CrossRef](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/gbe/evu094&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24803570&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsmj%2F45%2F8%2F840.atom) 30. 30.Hu R, Zhang Q, Gu Z. Molecular diversity of chromosomal metallo-β-lactamase genes in *Elizabethkingia* genus. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2020; 56: 105978. 31. 31.Perrin A, Larsonneur E, Nicholson AC, Edwards DJ, Gundlach KM, Whitney AM, et al. Evolutionary dynamics and genomic features of the *Elizabethkingia anophelis* 2015 to 2016 Wisconsin outbreak strain. Nat Commun 2017; 8: 15483. [CrossRef](http://smj.org.sa/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ncomms15483&link_type=DOI) 32. 32.Liang CY, Yang CH, Lai CH, Huang YH, Lin JN. Comparative genomics of 86 whole-genome sequences in the 6 species of the *Elizabethkingia* genus reveals intraspecific and interspecific divergence. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 19167. 33. 33.Hu R, Zhang Q, Gu Z. Whole-genome analysis of the potentially zoonotic *Elizabethkingia miricola* FL160902 with 2 new chromosomal MBL gene variants. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 75: 526-530. 34. 34.Seong H, Kim JH, Kim JH, Lee WJ, Ahn JY, M D NSK, et al. Risk factors for mortality in patients with *Elizabethkingia* infection and the clinical impact of the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of *Elizabethkingia* species. J Clin Med 2020; 9: 1431.