RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by Glidescope
JF Saudi Medical Journal
JO Saudi Med J
FD Prince Sultan Military Medical City
SP 1446
OP 1452
DO 10.15537/smj.2015.12.12432
VO 36
IS 12
A1 Sheta, Saad A.
A1 Abdelhalim, Ashraf A.
A1 ElZoughari, Ismail A.
A1 AlZahrani, Tariq A.
A1 Al-Saeed, Abdulhamid H.
YR 2015
UL http://smj.org.sa/content/36/12/1446.abstract
AB Objectives: To evaluate Parker Flex-It stylet as an alternative to GlideRite Rigid stylet to aid tracheal intubation with the Glidescope.Methods: This prospective randomized trial was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between May and December 2014. Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II patients were randomly assigned to one of 2 equal groups receiving intubation by Glidescope using either GlideRite Rigid stylet (Group GS) or Parker Flex-It stylet (Group PS). The total intubation time, ease of intubation, incidences of successful intubation at first attempt, number of intubation attempts, use of optimization maneuvers, and possible complications were recorded.Results: No significant differences between both groups regarding the total intubation time (p=0.08) was observed. Intubation was significantly easier in group PS compared with group GS as measured by visual analogue scale (p=0.001) with no significant differences between the groups regarding the rate of successful tracheal intubation from first attempt (p=0.524). However, the number of attempts at intubation and usage of external laryngeal manipulation were similar in both groups (p>0.05). The incidence of sore throat, dysphagia, hoarseness, and trauma were significantly higher in group GS (p<0.05).Conclusion: Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet when used by experienced operators in patients with normal airways using Glidescope; however, it is easier and less traumatic.