RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Dexmedetomidine as a substitute for remifentanil in ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopic surgery
JF Saudi Medical Journal
JO Saudi Med J
FD Prince Sultan Military Medical City
SP 77
OP 81
VO 30
IS 1
A1 Nevriye Salman
A1 Sennur Uzun
A1 Fehmi Coskun
A1 Mehmet A. Salman
A1 Akgun E. Salman
A1 Ulku Aypar
YR 2009
UL http://smj.org.sa/content/30/1/77.abstract
AB OBJECTIVE: To compare dexmedetomidine with remifentanil in desflurane based ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, in respect to its effects on orientation, discharge time, nausea-vomiting, and postoperative analgesic need.METHODS: Sixty 20-40 year old ASA I-II patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery were randomized into 2 groups. This study was performed in the operating theaters of the Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe, Turkey in 2004 as a prospective, randomized, and double blinded study. The remifentanil group group R, and dexmedetomidine group group D received a bolus of 1 ug/kg over 10 minutes, followed by 0.2 ug/kg/minute peroperative infusion of remifentanil, and 0.4 ug/kg/hour of dexmedetomidine. Hemodynamic parameters, time to extubation, and to orientation to person, place, and date, postoperative nausea, vomiting, pain, analgesic requirement at home, and satisfaction with anesthesia were recorded.RESULTS: Demographic, hemodynamic data, postoperative pain scores, and discharge time were similar in both groups. Time to extubation, to orientation to person, to place and date were shorter in group R. Postoperative nausea, vomiting, and analgesic requirements at home were less in group D.CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that dexmedetomidine infusion causes a relatively slow recovery with reduced postoperative nausea, vomiting, and analgesic requirements, and similar hemodynamics compared to remifentanil in ambulatory laparoscopic surgeries. It may be an alternative to remifentanil in ambulatory anesthesia.