PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Mulafikh, Dhaifallah S.
AU  - Alharethy, Sami E.
AU  - Alqabbani, Almaha A.
AU  - Mesallam, Tamer A.
TI  - Validation and clinical application of the Arabic rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation questionnaire
AID  - 10.15537/smj.2021.42.6.20210038
DP  - 2021 Jun 01
TA  - Saudi Medical Journal
PG  - 655--659
VI  - 42
IP  - 6
4099  - http://smj.org.sa/content/42/6/655.short
4100  - http://smj.org.sa/content/42/6/655.full
SO  - Saudi Med J2021 Jun 01; 42
AB  - Objectives: To carry out translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) into Arabic.Methods: This non-randomized, prospective study included 50 patients from the Otorhinolaryngology Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia who underwent primary rhinoplasty from January to October 2020 and a control group of 89 healthy individuals. The reliability of the Arabic (ROE) was tested using Cronbach’s alpha. The test-retest reliability was assessed by estimating the intra-class correlation coefficient for the total Arabic (ROE) score and individual items. Discriminant validity was used to examine the validity of the Arabic (ROE) by comparing the scores of the patients and the control group. The Friedman test was used to measure differences in Arabic (ROE) ratings within the study patients’ group, including preoperative, and 2 weeks, and 3 months postoperative ratings.Results: The internal consistency and reliability of the Arabic (ROE) were good. There was a significant difference in ratings between rhinoplasty patients and the control group regarding both the individual questions and total scores. Significant improvement was observed in the patient group ratings at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively compared to the preoperative rating (p<0.0001).Conclusions: The Arabic version of the (ROE) showed good reliability and validity and can be used in the assessment of rhinoplasty outcomes in the Arabic population.