RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The impact of viability assessment using cardiac MRI and echocardiogram on the outcome of revascularization in patients with multi-vessels coronary artery disease and moderate to severe ischemic cardiomyopathy
JF Saudi Medical Journal
JO Saudi Med J
FD Prince Sultan Military Medical City
SP 373
OP 378
DO 10.15537/smj.2023.44.4.20220133
VO 44
IS 4
A1 Alzahrani, Atif
A1 Mufti, Hani
A1 Alswat, Anas
A1 Altirkistani, Bsaim
A1 Aljehani, Mohammed
A1 Jazzar, Ahmed
A1 Alutaibi, Fahad
A1 Abushouk, Amir
A1 Rahimi, Jamilah Al
A1 Kashkari, Wail Al
A1 Althobaiti, Mohammed
YR 2023
UL http://smj.org.sa/content/44/4/373.abstract
AB Objectives: To investigate the influence of viability assessment in the management of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM).Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients with ICM with moderate to severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who underwent viability assessment using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and echocardiogram as modalities of imaging. In addition, LVEF, modality of choice, and treatment plans were all extracted as main variables from the electronic database. One hundred 6 patients who met the inclusion criteria from December 2014 to December 2019 were included.Results: Posttreatment LVEF improved by 5% in the viable group compared to the nonviable group (p=0.016). Regardless of the treatment received, 6 (8.8%) patients in the viable group died due to cardiac causes after an 18-month follow-up period; in contrast, 7 (18.4%) patients died due to cardiac causes in the nonviable group. However, despite that difference, this was not statistically significant (p=0.153). Medical therapy alone was observed in 32 (84.2%) patients in the nonviable group compared to 32 (47.1%) in the viable group (p<0.001). Although the reduction in hospitalization for cardiac reasons was not statistically significant, the viable arm had 50% fewer hospitalizations than the nonviable arm (p=0.051).Conclusion: Patients with viable myocardium had better outcomes in which LVEF significantly improved posttreatment. Additionally, there was a reduction in the number of hospitalizations for cardiac reasons in the viable group compared to the nonviable group, even though the difference was not statistically significant. However, further studies with a larger number of patients are needed to determine a definite conclusion.