RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Gastroesophageal stenting for the management of post sleeve gastrectomy leak
JF Saudi Medical Journal
JO Saudi Med J
FD Prince Sultan Military Medical City
SP 1339
OP 1343
DO 10.15537/smj.2016.12.15761
VO 37
IS 12
A1 Guzaiz, Noha
A1 Arabi, Mohammad
A1 Khankan, Azzam
A1 Salman, Refaat
A1 Al-Toki, Mohammed
A1 Qazi, Shahbaz
A1 Alzakari, Abdulmohsin
A1 Al-Moaiqel, Mohammad
YR 2016
UL http://smj.org.sa/content/37/12/1339.abstract
AB Objectives To retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness of gastroesophageal stenting for post sleeve gastrectomy staple line leaks using removable self-expandable stents.Methods Between April 2012 and June 2015, 12 consecutive patients (6 males) with mean age of 34 years: (21-38 years) presented with staple line leak 1-8 weeks after the operation (mean 2.8 weeks). Patients underwent gastroesophageal stenting by interventional radiology. A total of 23 stents were deployed with mean length of 17.8 cm (7-24 cm) and mean diameter 25.6 mm (18-36 mm). Stent re-insertion was needed in 7 patients (9 procedure), while 6 patients required percutaneous collection drainage and 3 patients required endoscopic glue injection with clipping. Two stent removal procedures were carried out under endoscopic visualization after failed stent capture under fluoroscopy, while the remaining stents were successfully removed by interventional radiology.Results Stent placement was technically successful in all patients. Stent migration occurred in 6 patients (50%). There is a tendency for stent migration with shorter stent length (R= -0.557, p=0.008). The mean duration of stenting was 60.5 days (14-137 days). All patients underwent stent removal and resumed oral intake with no recurrence of leak at a mean follow up time of 190 days (14-410 days). Complications included gastrointestinal bleeding (n=1), proximal esophageal stricture (n=1) and stent occlusion (n=1).Conclusion Gastroesophageal stenting as a primary measure after diagnosis of early post sleeve gastrectomy leak appears to offer a safe and effective alternative option in obviating repeat surgical interventions. Minimally invasive interventions may still be required for the management of persistent leak.