PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Omar, Haidi
AU  - Alhajrasi, Manar
AU  - Felemban, Nayef
AU  - Hassan, Ali
TI  - Dental arch dimensions, form and tooth size ratio among a Saudi sample
AID  - 10.15537/smj.2018.1.21035
DP  - 2018 Jan 01
TA  - Saudi Medical Journal
PG  - 86--91
VI  - 39
IP  - 1
4099  - http://smj.org.sa/content/39/1/86.short
4100  - http://smj.org.sa/content/39/1/86.full
SO  - Saudi Med J2018 Jan 01; 39
AB  - Objectives: To determine the dental arch dimensions and arch forms in a sample of Saudi orthodontic patients, to investigate the prevalence of Bolton anterior and overall tooth size discrepancies, and to compare the effect of gender on the measured parameters.Methods: This study is a biometric analysis of dental casts of 149 young adults recruited from different orthodontic centers in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The dental arch dimensions were measured. The measured parameters were arch length, arch width, Bolton’s ratio, and arch form. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS software version 22.0 (IBM Corporation, New York, USA); this cross-sectional study was conducted between April 2015 and May 2016.Results: Dental arch measurements, including inter-canine and inter-molar distance, were found to be significantly greater in males than females (p<0.05). The most prevalent dental arch forms were narrow tapered (50.3%) and narrow ovoid (34.2%), respectively. The prevalence of tooth size discrepancy in all cases was 43.6% for anterior ratio and 24.8% for overall ratio. The mean Bolton’s anterior ratio in all malocclusion classes was 79.81%, whereas the mean Bolton’s overall ratio was 92.21%. There was no significant difference between males and females regarding Bolton’s ratio.Conclusion: The most prevalent arch form was narrow tapered, followed by narrow ovoid. Males generally had larger dental arch measurements than females, and the prevalence of tooth size discrepancy was more in Bolton’s anterior teeth ratio than in overall ratio.