PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Tuncali, Dogan
AU  - Bingul, Ferruh
AU  - Terzioglu, Ahmet
AU  - Aslan, Gurcan
TI  - Animal bites
DP  - 2005 May 01
TA  - Saudi Medical Journal
PG  - 772--776
VI  - 26
IP  - 5
4099  - http://smj.org.sa/content/26/5/772.short
4100  - http://smj.org.sa/content/26/5/772.full
SO  - Saudi Med J2005 May 01; 26
AB  - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to put forward a retrospective analysis of animal bites treated in our department.METHODS: A total of 1315 patients treated in the Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery of Ankara Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey between January 2002 and March 2004 are included in the study. The fundamental treatment approaches were; copious saline irrigation, attentive debridement, appropriate antibiotic protocol, elevation and immobilization.RESULTS: Bites were produced by tamed (23.4%) and untamed animals (76.6%). The mostly encountered bites were from dogs (76.2%) followed by cats (21.7%). The injury sites were mostly in the lower (35.0%) and upper (33.0%) extremities. Overall infection rate was found to be 4% which were mainly due to cat bites. A very low infection rate (0.03%) was found in the group of patients who did not receive prophylaxis.CONCLUSION: Prophylactic antibiotics are recommended for severe injuries. Deep, dirty and defective injuries should be treated with delayed reconstruction. The majority of animal bite injuries in our country are consequence of untamed dogs and cats. The excessive lower extremity injuries can be attributed to this fact.