Table 3

- Content validity, relevance rating from ten experts.

Item no.E1E2E3E4E5E6E7E8E9E10I-CVIUA
1111111111111
2111111111111
3111111111111
4111111111111
5111111111111
6111111111111
7111111111111
8111111111111
9111111111111
10111111111111
11111111111111
12111111111111
131111111110.90
14111111110.80
15111111111111
161111111110.90
17111111111111
18111111111111
191111111110.90
20111111111111
211111111110.90
221111111110.90
231111111110.90
24111111111111
25111111111111
26111111111111
27111111111111
28111111111111
29111111111111
3011101111110.90
3111101111110.90
32111111111111
33111111111111
34111111111111
3510111111110.90
36111111111111
Proportion relevance10.9710.940.92110.970.891
S-CVI\ave0.94
S-CVI\UA0.72
Average proportion of items judged as relevant across the ten experts0.97
  • E: expert, I-CVI: item content validity index, UA: universal agreement, S-CVI: scale content validity index, S-CVI\ave: scale content validity index based on average, S-CVI\UA: scale content validity index based on universal agreement