Table 3

- Multivariate multinomial logistic regression analysis: predictors of non-scientific vs. scientific (conditional on the event that the outcome was one of those 2 categories).

EffectsBetaOdds ratioLower confidence intervalUpper confidence intervalP-value
Age0.005691.0060.9961.0150.2412
Gender: female vs. male0.46571.5931.1832.1450.0021
Marital status: married vs. single-0.16520.8480.6151.1680.3120
Educational level: educated vs. uneducated-0.42000.6570.4081.0580.0842
Currently working: yes vs. no-0.41980.6570.4710.9160.0133
Cancer type: hematological malignancy vs. solid tumor-0.17330.8410.5551.2740.4140
CAM use: yes vs. no-0.25220.7770.5181.1650.2219
Infectious disease: occasional vs. no-0.62150.5370.1581.8220.3187
Infectious disease: yes vs. no-1.18780.3050.0591.5650.1547
Disease can be cured: occasional vs. no1.28053.5991.5448.3870.0030
Disease can be cured: yes vs. no0.68581.9850.9734.0500.0594
Surgery: yes vs. no-0.04010.9610.6991.3190.8043
Radiation: yes vs. no0.05691.0590.7751.4460.7204
Chemotherapy: yes vs. no0.18241.2000.8121.7740.3599
SCT: yes vs. no-0.005400.9950.5401.8320.9862
Cohort 2 vs. cohort 1-0.86460.4210.2970.598<.0001

The results of the multinomial logistic regression where the cancer cause (scientific, mythical, and lack of knowledge) answer was modeled as the dependent variable with scientific as reference group and all the factors shown in the table were included as the independent variables. CAM: complementary and alternative medicine, SCT: stem cell transplant, vs.: versus