Table 2

- Prevalence of different types of child neglect by demographics.

TypesAgeGenderLiving arrangementsNumber of siblings
#x00A0;<11-3>3-5>5-12>12P-valueMaleFemaleP-valueLive with both parentsLive with single parentLive with extended family membersP-value<4≥4P-value
Physical2 (4.8)7 (5.3)2 (8.7)4 (4.3)2 (14.3)NS10 (6.3)7 (4.9)NS14 (5.2)3 (11.1)0 (0.0)NS2 (1.7)15 (10.4)<0.01
Medical17 (40.5)40 (30.5)7 (30.4)51 (54.8)6 (42.9)<0.0168 (42.5)53 (37.1)NS108 (40.0)12 (44.4)1 (16.7)NS37 (30.6)69 (47.9)<0.01
Supervisory31 (73.8)102 (77.9)14 (60.9)42 (45.2)6 (42.9)<0.01101 (63.1)94 (65.7)NS175 (64.8)17 (63.0)3 (50.0)NS85 (70.2)86 (59.7)NS
Educational0 (0.0)1 (0.8)0 (0.0)8 (8.6)1 (7.1)<0.052 (1.3)8 (5.6)<0.058 (3.0)2 (7.4)0 (0.0)NS1 (0.8)9 (6.3)<0.05
Emotional3 (7.1)4 (3.1)2 (8.7)10 (10.8)2 (14.3)NS12 (7.5)9 (6.3)NS15 (5.6)5 (18.5)1 (16.7)<0.0511 (9.1)10 (6.9)NS

Data are presented as a number and precentage (%). Pearson’s Chi-square test analysis was used to compare types of neglect and demographic variables. NS: not significant