Table 3

- Differences in recommended and at admission methods of contraception by the groups.

Study outcomesGroup I (n=1371)Group II (n=1371)P-values
At admission contraceptive method
None155 (11.3)30 (2.2)<0.001
Coitus interruptus788 (57.5)978 (71.3)<0.001
Condom134 (9.8)91 (6.6)<0.001
IUD169 (12.3)165 (12.0)0.06
Depo-Provera23 (1.7)23 (1.7)0.5
OCP84 (6.1)69 (5.0)<0.001
MPA16 (1.2)14 (1.0)0.003
LNG-RIA2 (0.1)1 (0.1)<0.001
Recommended contraceptive method
None2 (0.1)2 (0.1)0.5
Condom224 (16.3)153 (9.7)<0.001
IUD941 (68.0)1088 (79.4)<0.001
Depo-Provera41 (3.0)33 (2.4)<0.001
OCP71 (5.2)74 (5.4)0.013
MPA25 (1.8)30 (2.2)<0.001
BTL65 (4.7)8 (0.6)<0.001
LNG-RIA2 (0.1)3 (0.2)0.06

Values are presented as numbers and precentages (%). IUD: intrauterine device, OCP: oral contraceptive pill, MPA: medroxyprogesterone acetate, BTL: bilateral tubal ligation, LNG-RIA: levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system