Skip to main content
Log in

Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: A prospective cohort study for the treatment of advanced stages of breast carcinoma

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recent published series demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate reconstruction for the treatment of early-stage breast carcinoma. Although several reports have retrospectively evaluated outcomes after breast reconstruction for locally advanced disease (stages IIB and III), no study has specifically considered immediate breast reconstruction after SSM for locally advanced disease.

Methods

From 1996 to 1998, 67 consecutive patients with breast carcinoma underwent SSM with immediate reconstruction and were prospectively observed. From this group of patients, those with locally advanced disease (stage IIB, n=12; stage III, n=13) were analyzed separately. Tumor characteristics, adjuvant therapy, type of reconstruction, operative time, complications, hospital stay, and incidence of local recurrence and distant metastasis were noted.

Results

Breast reconstruction consisted of a transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (n=22) or a latissimus flap plus an implant (n=4). The median operative time was 5.5 hours; the average hospital stay was 5.2 days. Complications required reoperation in three patients (12%): partial skin flap necrosis in two and partial abdominal skin necrosis in one. Surgery on the opposite breast for symmetry was required in one patient (4%). Postoperative adjuvant therapy was not significantly delayed (median interval, 32 days). With a median length of follow-up of 49.2 months (range, 33–64 months), local recurrence was present in only one patient (4%), with successful local salvage treatment, and distant metastasis was present in four patients (16%).

Conclusions

SSM with immediate reconstruction seems safe and effective and has a low morbidity for patients with advanced stages of breast carcinoma. Local recurrence rates and the incidence of distant metastasis are not increased compared with those of patients who have had modified radical mastectomies without reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Toth BA, Lappert P. Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning.Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87:1048–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Simmons RM, Fish SK, Gayle L, et al. Local and distant recurrence rates in skin-sparing mastectomies compared with non-skin-sparing mastectomies.Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:676–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Tadjalli HE, et al. Risk of recurrence after treatment of early breast cancer with skin-sparing mastectomy.Ann Surg Oncol 1997;4:193–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Slavin SA, Schnitt SJ, Duda RB, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: oncologic risks and aesthetic results in patients with early-stage breast cancer.Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:49–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Newman LA, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK, et al. Presentation, treatment, and outcome of local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.Ann Surg Oncol 1998;5:620–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Carlson GW, Bostwick J, Styblo TM, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy: oncologic and reconstructive considerations.Ann Surg 1997;225:570–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carter CL, Allen C, Henson DE. Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases.Cancer 1989;63:181–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Newman LA, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK, et al. Feasibility of immediate breast reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer.Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:671–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Godfrey PM, Godfrey NV, Romita MC. Immediate autogenous breast reconstruction in clinically advanced disease.Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;95:1039–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Styblo TM, Lewis MM, Carlson GW, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction for stage III breast cancer using transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap.Ann Surg Oncol 1996;3:375–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sultan MR, Smith ML, Estabrook A, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction in patients with locally advanced disease.Ann Plast Surg 1997;38:345–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kroll SS, Ames F, Singletary SE, et al. The oncologic risks of skin preservation at mastectomy when combined with immediate reconstruction of the breast.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;172:17–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson CH, van Heerden JA, Donohue JH, et al. Oncological aspects of immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy for malignancy.Arch Surg 1989;124:819–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert D. Foster MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foster, R.D., Esserman, L.J., Anthony, J.P. et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: A prospective cohort study for the treatment of advanced stages of breast carcinoma. Annals of Surgical Oncology 9, 462–466 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557269

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557269

Key Words

Navigation