Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis in adults: a randomized controlled trial

  • Review
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to assess whether laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for complicated appendicitis (CA) effectively reduces the incidence of postoperative complications and improves various measurements of postoperative recovery in adults compared with open appendectomy (OA).

Methods

This single-center, randomized controlled trial was performed in the Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital. Patients diagnosed as having CA with peritonitis or abscess formation were eligible to participate and were randomly assigned to an LA group or an OA group. The primary study outcome was development of infectious complications, especially surgical site infection (SSI), within 30 days of surgery.

Results

Between October 2008 and August 2014, 81 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned with a 1:1 allocation ratio (42, LA; 39, OA). All were eligible for study of the primary endpoint. Groups were well balanced in terms of patient characteristics and preoperative levels of C-reactive protein. SSI occurred in 14 LA group patients (33.3 %) and in 10 OA group patients (25.6 %) (OR 1.450, 95 % CI 0.553–3.800; p = 0.476). Overall, the rate of postoperative complications, including incisional or organ/space SSI and stump leakage, did not differ significantly between groups. No significant differences between groups were found in hospital stay, duration of drainage, analgesic use, or parameters for postoperative recovery except days to walking.

Conclusion

These results suggested that LA for CA is safe and feasible, while the distinguishing benefit of LA was not validated in this clinical trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asarias JR, Schlussel AT, Cafasso DE, Carlson TL, Kasprenski MC, Washington EN, Lustik MB, Yamamura MS, Matayoshi EZ, Zagorski SM (2011) Incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses in open versus laparoscopic appendectomies. Surg Endosc 25:2678–2683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin HF, Lai HS, Lai IR (2014) Laparoscopic treatment of perforated appendicitis. World J Gastroenterol 21(20):14338–14347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Markides G, Subar D, Riyad K (2010) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 34:2026–2040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tiwari MM, Reynoso JF, Tsang AW, Oleynikov D (2011) Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Ann Surg 254:927–932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tuggle KR, Ortega G, Bolorunduro OB, Oyetunji TA, Alexander R, Turner PL, Chang DC, Cornwell EE 3rd, Fullum TM (2010) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in complicated appendicitis: a review of the NSQIP database. J Surg Res 163:225–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vahdad MR, Troebs RB, Nissen M, Burkhardt LB, Hardwig S, Cernaianu G (2013) Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children has complication rates comparable with those of open appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg 48:555–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dimitriou I, Reckmann B, Nephuth O, Betzler M (2013) Single institution’s experience in laparoscopic appendectomy as a suitable therapy for complicated appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:147–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Galli R, Banz V, Fenner H, Metzger J (2013) Laparoscopic approach in perforated appendicitis: increased incidence of surgical site infection? Surg Endosc 27:2928–2933

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Katsuno G, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Sugiyama K, Fukunaga M (2009) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. World J Surg 33:208–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Khiria LS, Ardhnari R, Mohan N, Kumar P, Nambiar R (2011) Laparoscopic appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis: is it safe and justified?: a retrospective analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:142–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lim SG, Ahn EJ, Kim SY, Chung IY, Park JM, Park SH, Choi KW (2011) A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 27:293–297

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Malagon AM, Arteaga-Gonzalez I, Rodriguez-Ballester L (2009) Outcomes after laparoscopic treatment of complicated versus uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a prospective, comparative trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:721–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Park HC, Yang DH, Lee BH (2009) The laparoscopic approach for perforated appendicitis, including cases complicated by abscess formation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:727–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thereaux J, Veyrie N, Corigliano N, Servajean S, Czernichow S, Bouillot JL (2014) Is laparoscopy a safe approach for diffuse appendicular peritonitis? Feasibility and determination of risk factors for post-operative intra-abdominal abscess. Surg Endosc 28:1908–1913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yeom S, Kim MS, Park S, Son T, Jung YY, Lee SA, Chang YS, Kim DH, Han JK (2014) Comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic and open approaches in the treatment of periappendiceal abscess diagnosed by radiologic investigation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:762–769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thomson JE, Kruger D, Jann-Kruger C, Kiss A, Omoshoro-Jones JA, Luvhengo T, Brand M (2015) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis: a randomized controlled trial to prove safety. Surg Endosc 29:2027–2032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Am J Infect Control 20:271–274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fukami Y, Hasegawa H, Sakamoto E, Komatsu S, Hiromatsu T (2007) Value of laparoscopic appendectomy in perforated appendicitis. World J Surg 31:93–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Edwards JP, Ho AL, Tee MC, Dixon E, Ball CG (2012) Wound protectors reduce surgical site infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 256:53–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee P, Waxman K, Taylor B, Yim S (2009) Use of wound-protection system and postoperative wound-infection rates in open appendectomy: a randomized prospective trial. Arch Surg 144:872–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li X, Zhang J, Sang L, Zhang W, Chu Z, Li X, Liu Y (2010) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy—a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 10:129

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Allemann P, Probst H, Demartines N, Schafer M (2011) Prevention of infectious complications after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis–the role of routine abdominal drainage. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:63–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moore CB, Smith RS, Herbertson R, Toevs C (2011) Does use of intraoperative irrigation with open or laparoscopic appendectomy reduce post-operative intra-abdominal abscess? Am Surg 77:78–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ohno Y, Furui J, Kanematsu T (2004) Treatment strategy when using intraoperative peritoneal lavage for perforated appendicitis in children: a preliminary report. Pediatr Surg Int 20:534–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pakula AM, Skinner R, Jones A, Chung R, Martin M (2014) Role of drains in laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis at a busy county hospital. Am Surg 80:1078–1081

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Iqbal CW, Fike FB, Sharp SW, Juang D, Lanning D, Murphy JP, Andrews WS, Sharp RJ, Snyder CL, Holcomb GW, Ostlie DJ (2012) Irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 256:581–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Andersson RE, Petzold MG (2007) Nonsurgical treatment of appendiceal abscess or phlegmon: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 246:741–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nazarey PP, Stylianos S, Velis E, Triana J, Diana-Zerpa J, Pasaron R, Stylianos V, Malvezzi L, Knight C, Burnweit C (2014) Treatment of suspected acute perforated appendicitis with antibiotics and interval appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg 49:447–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Simillis C, Symeonides P, Shorthouse AJ, Tekkis PP (2010) A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon). Surgery 147:818–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Williams RF, Interiano RB, Paton E, Eubanks JW, Huang EY, Langham MR, Blakely ML (2014) Impact of a randomized clinical trial on children with perforated appendicitis. Surgery 156:462–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Beldi G, Vorburger SA, Bruegger LE, Kocher T, Inderbitzin D, Candinas D (2006) Analysis of stapling versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. Br J Surg 93:1390–1393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kazemier G, in’t Hof KH, Saad S, Bonjer HJ, Sauerland S (2006) Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling? Surg Endosc 20:1473–1476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sahm M, Kube R, Schmidt S, Ritter C, Pross M, Lippert H (2011) Current analysis of endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. Surg Endosc 25:124–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Duepree HJ, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2003) Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg 197:177–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Laurent C, Leblanc F, Bretagnol F, Capdepont M, Rullier E (2008) Long-term wound advantages of the laparoscopic approach in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:903–908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiro Taguchi.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Yoshiro Taguchi, Shunichiro Komatsu, Eiji Sakamoto, Shinji Norimizu, Yuji Shingu, and Hiroshi Hasegawa have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taguchi, Y., Komatsu, S., Sakamoto, E. et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis in adults: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 30, 1705–1712 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4453-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4453-x

Keywords

Navigation