Risk factors of pain in mammographic screening
Introduction
Breast cancer is an important health issue in most European countries. In Flanders, it is the most common type of cancer in women and it is responsible for the loss of more potential years of life than any other cause of death (Ministry of the Flemish Community, 1996). Early detection is until today the only efficient means of (secondary) breast cancer prevention. The earlier breast cancer is detected, the earlier treatment can be started and the greater the chance of cure. Together with self-examination and clinical examination by physicians, mammographic examination (i.e. an X-ray of the breast) is regarded as the most effective way of detecting breast cancer. In 1996 a total of 628.602 mammographies were taken in Belgium (approx. 10 million inhabitants) (Ministry of the Flemish Community, 1998). As such, mammography is an important tool in breast cancer prevention policy today (Hakama et al., 1997). The drawback from the mammographic screening procedure is the intrinsic motivation of women to take part in it. In Belgium only 20–33% of the women contacted to participate in a screening respond. Painful experiences with mammography are considered to be a crucial factor for no longer participating in the program. This article searches for the main sources of pain in the mammographic procedure.
Section snippets
Literature review
Women who have an average risk of developing breast cancer are recommended in Belgium to go for a regular screening mammography from age 50. Women under 50 are primarily advised to regularly examine their own breasts; in their case, mammography is only required if there is an increased breast cancer risk (Drossaert et al., 1996), or if a suspect lump is discovered or other breast cancer symptoms are noticed. Regular screening under 50 is discouraged because of the multiple adverse effects (
Study objective
In the course of 1996, a study of mammography pain was carried out at the Department of Political and Social Sciences at Antwerp University (UIA). The purpose was to gain insight into why some women feel pain during mammography and others do not. Firstly, the study set out to determine to what extent women actually experience pain as a result of mammographic examination. Secondly, it focused on identifying the factors that determine the amount of pain that a woman experiences. This article will
Results
Before we turn to the analysis of the different pain factors, we will first present a descriptive overview of the different subjects within our sample.
Discussion
Since pain during mammography is an important element for the success of breast cancer prevention campaigns (Rutter et al., 1992), it is of special importance to gain insight in the different factors that can influence the experience of pain. A woman’s perception of mammography, how she assesses the procedure and the way in which she relates the event are partly determined by the degree of pain she felt during the examination. Moreover, it appears that the whole mammography experience
References (21)
Categorical Data Analysis
(1990)- et al.
‘Transcending the dualism: towards a sociology of pain’
Sociology of Health and Illness
(1995) - et al.
‘Perceived risk, anxiety, mammogram uptake, and breast self examination of women with a family history of breast cancer—the role of knowing to be at increased risk’
Cancer Detection and Prevention
(1996) ‘Mammography compression: science or art?’
Radiology
(1991)- Eklund, G.W., Cardenosa, 1991 ‘Art of positioning needs revival in mammography’. Diagnostic Imaging 13, September,...
- et al.
‘What are the psychological factors influencing attendance, non-attendance and re-attendance at a breast screening centre?’
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
(1990) ‘Breast cancer screening in women aged under 50’
British Medical Journal
(1997)- et al.
‘Effectiveness of the public health policy for breast cancer screening in Finland: population based cohort study’
British Medical Journal
(1997) ‘Comparing effects in dichotomous logistic regression: a variety of standardized coefficients’
Social Science Quarterly
(1996)- Kornguth, P.J., Rimer, B.K., Conaway, M.R., 1993 ‘Impact of Patient-controlled Compression on the Mammography...
Cited by (43)
Patient-assisted compression helps for image quality reduction dose and improves patient experience in mammography
2018, European Journal of CancerDose, compression and “risk of pain” in mammography
2016, Imagen DiagnosticaPerceptions of the Screening Mammography Experience by Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White Women
2012, Women's Health IssuesA View from the Inside: A Practitioner's Encounter with Patient Privacy
2010, Breast DiseasesScreening and Prevention of Breast Cancer in Primary Care
2009, Primary Care - Clinics in Office PracticeCitation Excerpt :Most cases of DCIS will not be associated with subsequent invasive breast cancer,67–69 but almost all women diagnosed with DCIS undergo lumpectomy with radiation therapy and a substantial proportion are treated with mastectomy. Women having mammograms often experience pain from compression of the breast70,71 and for 20% to 30% of women the pain is moderate to severe.72,73 In addition, it has long been recognized that exposure to ionizing radiation through mammography, although limited, may be associated with a small increased risk of cancer, particularly if the exposure occurs at a young age.74–76