Elsevier

European Journal of Cancer

Volume 46, Issue 17, November 2010, Pages 3040-3052
European Journal of Cancer

Prostate cancer incidence and mortality trends in 37 European countries: An overview

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Prostate cancer has emerged as the most frequent cancer amongst men in Europe, with incidence increasing rapidly over the past two decades. Incidence has been uniformly increasing in the 24 countries with comparable data available, although in a few countries with very high rates (Sweden, Finland and The Netherlands), incidence has begun to fall during the last 3–4 years. The highest prostate cancer mortality rates are in the Baltic region (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) and in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Prostate cancer mortality has been decreasing in 13 of the 37 European countries considered – predominantly in higher-resource countries within each region – beginning in England and Wales (1992) and more recently in the Czech Republic (2004). There was considerable variability in the magnitude of the annual declines, varying from approximately 1% in Scotland (from 1994) to over 4% for the more recent declines in Hungary, France and the Czech Republic. There appears little relation between the extent of the increases in incidence (in the late 1990s) and the recent mortality declines. It remains unclear to what extent the increasing trends in incidence indicate true risk and how much is due to detection of latent disease. The decreasing mortality after 1990 may be attributable to improvements in treatment and to an effect of prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing. The increase in mortality observed in the Baltic region and in several Central and Eastern European countries appear to reflect a real increase in risk and requires further monitoring.

Introduction

Prostate cancer has become the most common non-skin cancer neoplasm amongst men in Europe, with an estimated 382,000 cases occurring in 2008.1 Incidence has increased rapidly over the past two decades, and rates are influenced by early diagnosis by prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing amongst men, with or without symptoms, as well as by the detection of latent cancer in prostate surgery. PSA testing has been particularly common in certain Northern and Western European countries, an observation likely to explain much of the eightfold variation in incidence rates in Europe around 2000, with rates highest in Tyrol, Austria and lowest in Serbia.2

Almost 90,000 deaths from prostate cancer were estimated to have occurred in 2008 in Europe, ranking it the third most common cause of cancer death amongst men, after lung and colorectal cancers.1

The mortality rate is less affected by early diagnosis of asymptomatic cancers, and consequently the high death rates in the Nordic countries are five times those seen in several Central and Eastern European countries (such as Serbia, Russia and the Ukraine), where rates have been relatively low for decades.

This study aims to describe comprehensively the overall trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates in 37 European countries by region, using published incidence data from population-based national and regional cancer registries and national death rates from the World Health Organisation (WHO) mortality databank. The temporal trends in rates are compared and discussed in light of the recent impact – within the last 15 years – of treatment with curative intent versus that of PSA testing, subsequent biopsy and treatment on mortality.

Section snippets

Incidence

Numbers of incident prostate cancer cases (ICD-10 C61) and the corresponding population figures were obtained from recently published reports from population-based cancer registries in Europe, with data commonly obtained from the Institutions’ websites. The data for England and Wales were extracted from the Office for National Statistics website (www.statistics.gov.uk), and those from Scotland from the Information Services Division website (www.isdscotland.org). To merit inclusion, incidence

Statistical methods

The annual age-standardised rates (ASR) of prostate cancer incidence and mortality were calculated for all ages by country and period using the European standard population.4 To provide estimated annual percentage change (EAPC), country-specific regression models of year of event were fitted to the rates using the Joinpoint regression programme version 3.4.2.5

Joinpoint regression is a tool for identifying sudden changes in the long-term trend in epochs, or linear segments of time, for which

Geographical variations in incidence and mortality

A comparison of prostate cancer incidence in 24 European countries revealed a fivefold variation in the age-adjusted rates 2001–2005, from less than 30 in the Russian Federation to more than 150 per 100,000 in Finland and Sweden (Fig. 1). Rates were high also in Iceland and Switzerland and tended to be relatively low in Belarus and Poland. Mortality rates varied by a factor of 2.5 around 2006, with rates above 30 in the Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania), as well as in several

Discussion

For all the 24 countries included in this analysis, an increase in prostate cancer incidence during the study period was observed. In Sweden, Finland and The Netherlands – countries with the highest incidence – rates reached a plateau or even started to decline towards the end of the observation period (after 2005, having reached ASRs approaching 200 per 100,000). The highest prostate cancer mortality rates were in the Baltic region (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) and in the Nordic countries

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Acknowledgements

We thank the following European cancer registries (Director in parentheses) who are participating investigators, having contributed their data and their expertise in commenting on the final article: Belarus – Belarusian Cancer Registry, Minsk (Alexander A. Grakovich); Croatia – Croatian National Cancer Registry (Ariana Znaor); Czech Republic – Czech National Cancer Registry, Prague (Vlasta Mazánková); Denmark – Danish Cancer Registry, Copenhagen (Marianne Gjerstorff) and Danish Cancer Society,

References (48)

  • J.M. Lutz et al.

    The impact of coding process on observed cancer mortality trends in Switzerland

    Eur J Cancer Prev

    (2004)
  • R. Doll et al.

    Summarizing indices for comparison of cancer incidence data

    Int J Cancer

    (1967)
  • H.J. Kim et al.

    Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates

    Stat Med

    (2000)
  • Boyle P, Parkin DM. Cancer registration: principles and methods. In: Statistical methods for registries, vol. 95. IARC...
  • L.X. Clegg et al.

    Estimating average annual per cent change in trend analysis

    Stat Med

    (2009)
  • F.H. Schroder et al.

    Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study

    N Engl J Med

    (2009)
  • M.R. Cooperberg et al.

    Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2010)
  • M. Bolla et al.

    Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2009)
  • E. Bria et al.

    Does hormone treatment added to radiotherapy improve outcome in locally advanced prostate cancer?: meta-analysis of randomized trials

    Cancer

    (2009)
  • T.J. Murtola et al.

    Prostate cancer and PSA among statin users in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial

    Int J Cancer

    (2010)
  • S. Bonovas et al.

    Statin use and the risk of prostate cancer: a metaanalysis of 6 randomized clinical trials and 13 observational studies

    Int J Cancer

    (2008)
  • L. Signorello

    Prostate cancer

  • P. Lichtenstein et al.

    Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer – analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland

    N Engl J Med

    (2000)
  • G.B. Christensen et al.

    Genome-wide linkage analysis of 1233 prostate cancer pedigrees from the International Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics using novel sumLINK and sumLOD analyses

    Prostate

    (2010)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text