Research articleA survey on the future of radiology among radiologists, medical students and surgeons: Students and surgeons tend to be more skeptical about artificial intelligence and radiologists may fear that other disciplines take over
Introduction
Harvard Professor Clayton Christensen first introduced the theory of “disruptive innovation” in his book “The Innovator’s dilemma” [1]. A disruptive innovation is one that significantly alters the way businesses or entire industries operate and leads to the displacement of established technologies. In radiology, AI (artificial intelligence) could be such a disruptive technology that might tremendously change the way diagnostic imaging is performed. Further challenges towards the current way radiology operates could be turf losses (takeovers of radiological examinations by other disciplines), growing competitiveness of the job market and teleradiology [[2], [3], [4], [5], [6]]. An opportunity could arise for radiology by establishing itself as a specialist in 3D printing. Seeing a great future in the use of AI in radiology, a vast amount of research is being performed in this field, by academic centers but also by the industry, e.g. by digital giants like Google and Apple [[7], [8], [9], [10]]. With optimal use, AI could help radiologists and ultimately hospitals work more efficiently and thus save money by implementing AI based software to perform easy and repetitive but time-consuming tasks such as nodule detection [11]. With radiologists and AI currently being on the same level of accuracy in detecting nodules [12,13], they could improve their diagnostic accuracy by using artificial intelligence [14]. Not only could radiologists be supported in detecting abnormalities, they could also take advantage of AI-assisted interpretation and potentially AI-based integration of other clinical information [[15], [16], [17]]. Further application of these developments includes the use in an emergency setting, where cases of pneumothorax, bleedings, renal stones and foreign bodies could be automatically identified, assisting radiologists in the diagnostic process, optimizing it to be faster and more accurate [18]. The use of AI is a growing field in radiology, which can be a concern or even a threat to practicing diagnostic radiologists, as the renowned Geoffrey Hinton, an expert on artificial neural networks, believes [11].
Since the topic of AI implementation into radiology, the takeover of radiological examinations by other disciplines, teleradiology, and 3D printing are subjects of heated discussions, we wanted to know how radiologists, medical students and surgeons perceive these developments. We were interested in the opinions of medical students, as they are the next generation of doctors and possible radiologists, and the opinions of surgeons, as a group of clinicians whose work is strongly influenced by radiology. Thereby we conducted a survey to evaluate the opinions and assessments of radiologists, surgeons and medical students on a variety of potential chances and threats to radiology.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The SurveyMonkey platform was used to create an electronic survey with implemented logic that allowed us to ask participants profession-adapted questions following a general questionnaire. The survey was divided into different sections. The first section consisted of a group of demographic questions, followed by questions on the future of radiology such as questions on AI, teleradiology, turf losses, 3D printing and the future of the profession of radiologists. Subsequent sections were
Results
Over a four-week period, a total of 203 individuals filled out the questionnaire, of which 170 completed it. Of these 170 participants, 59 were radiologists (40 diagnostic; 2 interventional; 17 both), 56 were surgeons and 55 were students. Of the participants who completed the questionnaire, 40 % were female, 59 % were male, and 1 % answered other.
Discussion
The aim of this study was to investigate the perceptions and attitudes of radiologists, surgeons and medical students towards AI and other developments that might represent opportunities or threats to radiology as a field of work.
Our results show in part substantial differences in the perception of AI among participants. While all three groups agree that AI should be integrated into the diagnostic process of radiological imaging, radiologists tend to support a future use of AI more than
Declaration of Competing Interest
None.
Acknowledgements
None.
References (32)
- et al.
Ensuring the future of radiology: how to respond to the threats
J. Am. Coll. Radiol.
(2013) - et al.
Turf wars in radiology: should it be radiologists or cardiologists who do cardiac imaging?
J. Am. Coll. Radiol.
(2005) - et al.
Turf wars in radiology: the future of radiology depends on research-and on your support of it!
J. Am. Coll. Radiol.
(2007) - et al.
Turf wars in radiology: introduction
J. Am. Coll. Radiol.
(2004) - et al.
Toward augmented radiologists: changes in radiology education in the era of machine learning and artificial intelligence
Acad. Radiol.
(2018) Machine learning approaches in medical image analysis: from detection to diagnosis
Med. Image Anal.
(2016)The future of radiology augmented with Artificial Intelligence: a strategy for success
Eur. J. Radiol.
(2018)- et al.
Big data and the future of radiology informatics
Acad. Radiol.
(2016) - et al.
Artificial intelligence in medical practice : the question to the answer?
Am. J. Med.
(2018) - et al.
The long-term impact of preclinical education on medical students’ opinions about radiology
Acad. Radiol.
(2008)
The Innovator’s Dilemma
Turf battles in radiology: how to avoid/how to fight/how to win
Eur. Radiol.
Bits and bytes: the future of radiology lies in informatics and information technology
Eur. Radiol.
Role of big data and machine learning in diagnostic decision support in radiology
J. Am. Coll. Radiol.
Deep learning in mammography diagnostic accuracy of a multipurpose image analysis software in the detection of breast Cancer
Invest Radiol. C
Deep learning for chest radiograph diagnosis: a retrospective comparison of the CheXNeXt algorithm to practicing radiologists
PLoS Med.
Cited by (63)
Multi-stakeholder preferences for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review and thematic analysis
2023, Social Science and MedicineHow do medical students, residents and graduated physicians really perceive radiologists? A cross-national study
2023, European Journal of RadiologySystematic Review of Radiology Residency Artificial Intelligence Curricula: Preparing Future Radiologists for the Artificial Intelligence Era
2023, Journal of the American College of Radiology