Elsevier

Fertility and Sterility

Volume 98, Issue 5, November 2012, Pages 1165-1169
Fertility and Sterility

Original article
Pregnancy loss after frozen-embryo transfer—a comparison of three protocols

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1058Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Objective

To compare the reproductive outcome of three protocols for frozen ET treatment.

Design

Retrospective follow-up study.

Setting

Two public clinics and one private clinic.

Patient(s)

Four thousand four hundred seventy frozen ET cycles between 2006 and 2010.

Intervention(s)

Thawing of embryos and ET.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Pregnancy test rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and pregnancy loss rate.

Result(s)

The natural cycle followed by P (NC + P) was used in 26% of cycles, the natural cycle with hCG (NC + hCG) in 10%, and the substituted cycle with estrogen and P (E + P) in 64% of cycles. The rate of transfers after thawing was similar in all groups (87.2%, 73.9%, and 87.2%, respectively). There was a significantly higher positive pregnancy test rate in the E + P (34.3%) and NC + hCG (35.5%) cycles as compared with the NC + P cycles (26.7%). However, the clinical pregnancy rate was similar in all groups (27.7%, 29.1%, and 24.3%, respectively). Moreover, no differences were seen between groups regarding the live-birth rate (20.1%, 23.5%, and 20.7%, respectively). A logistic regression analysis showed that the type of protocol was the only predictor of pregnancy loss, while age, irregular cycles, endometrial thickness, number, and quality of embryos transferred did not correlate to pregnancy loss.

Conclusion(s)

A higher positive pregnancy test rate was obtained in E + P frozen ET cycles in comparison with other protocols; however, due to an increased preclinical and clinical pregnancy loss, comparable clinical pregnancy, and delivery rates are reported for the three protocols.

Key Words

FET
frozen embryo transfer
substituted cycles
pregnancy loss
luteal support

Cited by (0)

C.T. reports honoraria for lectures from MSD (unrelated to this work). B.A. has nothing to disclose. H.M. has nothing to disclose. P.H. reports unrestricted research grants and honoraria for lectures from Merck Serono and MSD (unrelated to this work).