Patient Perception, Preference and ParticipationAwareness of lifestyle risk factors for cancer and heart disease among adults in the UK
Introduction
Unhealthy lifestyles such as tobacco smoking, unhealthy diet, excessive alcohol consumption and physical inactivity are having an unprecedented impact on the health of the public [1]. For example, over 50% of cancers and over 40% of circulatory diseases including heart disease are believed to be attributable to lifestyle factors. Cancer and heart disease are the leading causes of death in the UK [2], with 21% of premature deaths in men and 12% in women being from heart disease [3], and one in three people developing cancer in their lifetime [4]. In the US, smoking is estimated to account for around 30% of all cancers, obesity for 15%, poor diet for at least 10%, inactivity for 5%, and alcohol consumption for 4% [5]. Worldwide, approximately 31% of heart disease is believed to be attributable to poor diet (e.g. low intake of fruit and vegetables) and 22% to physical inactivity, and a further 22% is estimated to be attributable to smoking in industrialized countries [1]. In addition, the World Health Organization (WHO) recently stated that a number of cardiovascular disorders are adversely affected by excessive alcohol consumption [6]. In women, maintaining a desirable body weight, eating a healthy diet, exercising regularly, not smoking, and consuming a moderate amount of alcohol could result in an 84% lower heart disease risk, yet only 3% of women fall into that category [7].
Promoting healthy lifestyles to reduce cancer and heart disease, as well as other common conditions, is therefore a clear public health priority. However, predicting and promoting healthy lifestyles is complex. Social cognition models of health behaviour posit a range of factors that appear to influence behaviour, including perceived threat (e.g. perceived severity of and susceptibility to disease), perceived response-efficacy (e.g. confidence that engaging in a recommended behaviour will reduce the threat of disease), and perceived self-efficacy (i.e. confidence in personal ability to carry out the recommended behaviour) [8]. Because a prerequisite of a number of these cognitions is knowledge or awareness of the association between the disease and the behaviour, ensuring public awareness of the links between common disease and lifestyle is a necessary, albeit not alone sufficient, step towards helping people to understand the potential health consequences of their actions, and towards encouraging them to take risk-reducing action and make currently much-needed changes to their lifestyle [9].
Several surveys have shown high public awareness of the links between smoking and developing lung cancer, but considerably lower awareness of the impact that other lifestyles such as eating a healthy diet can have on cancer risk [10], [11], [12], [13]. Thus people may believe that there is nothing else they can do to reduce their chances of developing cancer other than not to smoke. Importantly, spontaneous awareness of risk factors may actually be even lower than reported, because all of these studies have asked people to endorse risk factors from a list, and this method has been shown to produce higher estimates of knowledge than open-ended questions [14].
We are not aware of any surveys exploring what people in the general population believe about the role of lifestyles in causing heart disease, the other major cause of mortality in the UK and other Western countries. Existing heart disease research has focused predominantly on patient groups and has been conducted largely in the context of rehabilitation programmes [15], [16], [17], [18]. This research has tended to show that even in these high risk populations awareness of the role of lifestyles in heart disease is higher than for population-levels for cancer, but still low. It is not clear to what extent these findings regarding heart disease can be extrapolated to the wider general public, nor is it clear to what extent the attitudes of these patient groups specifically represent people with high family history-based risk of disease outside of the clinic setting.
Finally, no studies have directly compared knowledge of the role of lifestyles in causing cancer and heart disease in a single sample. Doing so could shed light on how public perceptions of these two major causes of ill health and mortality differ, providing useful information for those engaged in developing patient education materials and public health messages about disease prevention.
The aims of the present study were: to assess levels of public awareness of lifestyle risk factors for cancer using open-ended questions; to identify demographic factors associated with awareness; to examine whether people with a family history of the disease were more aware of the importance of lifestyle in disease prevention than those with no family history; and to compare these levels of, and factors associated with, awareness of lifestyle risk factors for heart disease in the same population-based sample. Because the focus of this study was on awareness of modifiable lifestyle risk factors for these diseases, other risk factors such as occupational environment were not coded for in the present analyses. We predicted on the basis of previous research that awareness of risk factors for cancer would be higher amongst women and those with higher levels of education. In the absence of any prior comparative data on heart disease, we predicted that levels of awareness would be higher for heart disease than for cancer, but still low; that the same factors would be associated with awareness of heart disease risk factors as for cancer risk factors; and that, because it has greater personal relevance, people with a family history of each disease would be more aware of the links between lifestyle and that disease than those with no family history.
Section snippets
Design and sample
Data were collected as part of an Office of National Statistics (ONS) Omnibus Survey in September 2002. The Omnibus Survey is a monthly, multipurpose survey for use by government and non-profit making organizations, which uses a stratified random probability sample to select households for a home visit. Previous ONS Omnibus Surveys have addressed a range of health-related issues, including obesity [19], oral health [20] and health status [21]. For the present study, we included a series of
Respondent characteristics
Respondent ages ranged from 16 to 75 years. 53% were female, 94% were White-British. 45% reported a family history of heart disease, 57% a family history of cancer. 29% were current-smokers and 23% reported significant health problems.
Number of lifestyle risk factors identified
Overall, respondents identified 2.1 lifestyle risk factors for heart disease and 1.4 for cancer (p < 0.001). 9% and 11% did not identify any lifestyle risk factors for heart disease or cancer respectively. For heart disease, 19%, 34%, 28% and 9% identified one, two,
Discussion
The results of this study indicate that public awareness of the role of lifestyle factors in risk of cancer is very low except for smoking. Awareness was higher for heart disease, but still low. The strongest predictor of awareness was education, and there were weak associations with family history.
The findings support previous studies that have found low levels of awareness of cancer risk factors in general population samples [13], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. As in previous studies [13]
Competing interests
None.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Cancer Research UK and the Department of Health and Department of Trade and industry-funded London Genetics Knowledge Park.
References (42)
- et al.
Self-regulation and the behavioural response to DNA risk information: a theoretical analysis and framework for future research
Soc Sci Med
(2006) - et al.
Awareness of risk factors for cancer among British adults
Public Health
(2001) - et al.
Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: patient beliefs and health-related behaviour
J Psychosom Res
(2005) - et al.
The purpose of attributing cause: beliefs about the causes of myocardial infarction
Soc Sci Med
(2005) - et al.
Perceptions of patients with cardiovascular disease about the causes of coronary artery disease
Heart Lung
(1997) - et al.
Americans’ knowledge of cancer risk and survival
Prev Med
(1997) - et al.
Knowledge attitudes, and behavioral intentions in relation to the early detection of colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom
Prev Med
(2003) - et al.
Knowledge perceptions about breast cancer incidence, fatality and risk among Australian women
Aust N Z J Public Health
(1999) - et al.
Beliefs about the risk factors for cervical cancer in a British population sample
Prev Med
(2004) - et al.
The knowledge and use of screening tests for colorectal and prostate cancer: data from the 1987 National Health Interview Survey
Prev Med
(1990)
Illness perceptions: a new paradigm for psychosomatics?
J Psychosom Res
Family history of type 2 diabetes: a population-based screening tool for prevention?
Genet Med
Family history of heart disease and cardiovascular disease risk-reducing behaviors
Genet Med
Familial risk assessment for early-onset coronary heart disease
Genet Med
Can family history be used as a tool for public health and preventive medicine?
Genet Med
Lifetime risk for developing congestive congestive heart failure
Circulation
Registrations of cancer diagnosed in 1994-1997 England & Wales
Health Stat Q
Modifiable risk factors for cancer
Br J Cancer
Cited by (105)
Cancer awareness in older adults: Results from the Spanish Onco-barometer cross-sectional survey
2023, International Journal of Nursing StudiesAn ecological study of obesity-related cancer incidence trends in Australia from 1983 to 2017
2022, The Lancet Regional Health - Western PacificCitation Excerpt :Recent strategies reinforced previous calls to action for obesity control and outlined a range of cost-effective actions, including fiscal policy to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and reducing marketing of unhealthy foods to children.60,61 Additionally, the public understanding of the role of obesity in increasing cancer risk is considered low,62–64 thus including this in health promotion messaging may provide a novel angle to generate attention and motivate behavioural change and action. Using these frameworks and strategies to set clear targets, have consistent and accountable governance and invest in effective interventions is crucial moving forward to improve health outcomes,3 and could contribute to reducing the economic impact of obesity-related cancers.
Facilitating healthy dietary habits: An experiment with a low income population
2020, European Economic ReviewAwareness of alcohol as a risk factor for cancer: A population-based cross-sectional study among 3000 Danish men and women
2020, Preventive Medicine Reports(No) time to be healthy: Optimal policy with time and monetary investments in health
2024, Health Economics (United Kingdom)