Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Patient Characteristics do not Predict Poor Glycaemic Control in type 2 Diabetes Patients Treated in Primary Care

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many diabetic patients in general practice do not achieve good glycaemic control. The aim of this study was to assess which characteristics of type 2 diabetes patients treated in primary care predict poor glycaemic control (HbA1c≥ 7%). Data were collected from the medical records. 1641 patients were included who had mean HbA1c 7.1(SD 1.7)%, and 42% had HbA1c≥ 7%. On univariate analysis younger age; longer duration of diabetes; higher levels of blood glucose at diagnosis; most recent fasting blood glucose (FBG), total cholesterol, and triglyceride; higher body mass index (BMI); treatment with oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHA); treatment with insulin; more GP-visits for diabetes in the last year; and lower educational level were associated with poor control. Both in multiple linear regression and in multiple logistic regression higher levels of FBG (odds ratio (OR):= 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49, 1.70), treatment with OHA (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.41, 3.04), treatment with insulin (OR: 7.2, 95% CI: 4.18, 12.52), lower educational level (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.56) were independently associated with poor levels of HbA1c. When FBG levels were excluded from the model, higher blood glucose at diagnosis, higher values for triglyceride and total cholesterol, and younger age predicted poor glycaemic control, but these variables explained only 15% of the variation in HbA1c. In conclusion prediction of poor glycaemic control from patient characteristics in diabetic patients in general practice is hardly possible. FBG appeared to be a strong predictor of HbA1c, which underlines the usefulness of this simple test in daily diabetes care. The worse metabolic control in those treated with either OHA or insulin suggests that current treatment regimes might be not sufficiently applied to reach the targets of care. Providers of diabetes care should be attentive to patients with lower educational level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Implications of the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study. American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2002;25:S28–S32.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Woolf SH, Davidson MB, Greenfield S, et al. Controlling blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. An evidence-based policy statement by the American Academy of Family Physicians and American Diabetes Association. J Fam Pract 2000;49: 453–460.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wiersma TJ, Heine RJ, Rutten GE. [Summary of the practice guideline ‘Diabetes mellitus type 2’ (rst revision)of the Dutch College of General Practitioners]. Ned Tijdschr Genees 1999;143:1688–1691.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Khunti K, Baker R, Rumsey M, Lakhani M. Quality of care of patients with diabetes:Collation of data from multi-practice audits of diabetes in primary care. Fam Pract 1999;16:54–59.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goudswaard AN, Lam K, Stolk RP, Rutten GE. Quality of recording of data from patients with type 2 diabetes is not a valid indicator of quality of care. A cross-sectional study. Fam Pract 2003;20:173–177.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pringle M, Stewart-Evans C, Coupland C, Williams I, Allison S, Sterland J. Influences on control in diabetes mellitus:Patient, doctor, practice, or delivery of care? Br Med J 1993;306:630–634.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Khunti K, Ganguli S, Baker R, Lowy A. Features of primary care associated with variations in process and outcome of care of people with diabetes. Br J Gen Pract 2001;51:356–360.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hansen LJ, Olivarius N de F, Siersma V, Andersen JS. Doctors’ characteristics do not predict long-term glycaemic control in type 2 diabetic patients. Br J Gen Pract 2003;53:47–49.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brown JB, Harris SB, Webster-Bogaert S, Wetmore S, Faulds C, Stewart M. The role of patient, physician and systemic factors in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Fam Pract 2002;19:344–349.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rutten GE, Maaijen J, Valkenburg AC, Blankestijn JG, de Valk HW. The Utrecht Diabetes Project:Telemedicine support improves GP care in Type 2 diabetes. Diabetic Med 2001;18:459–463.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bouma M, Dekker JH, Van Eijk JT, Schellevis FG, Kriegsman DM, Heine RJ. Metabolic control and morbidity of type 2 diabetic patients in a general practice network. Fam Pract 1999;16:402–406.

    Google Scholar 

  12. De Grauw WJ, van Gerwen WH, van de Lisdonk EH, van Den Hoogen HJ, van den Bosch WJ, van Weel C. Outcomes of audit-enhanced monitoring of patients with type 2 diabetes. J Fam Pract 2002;51:459–464.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bouma M, Dekker JH, de Sonnaville JJ, et al. How valid is fasting plasma glucose as a parameter of glycemic control in non-insulin-using patients with type 2 diabetes? Diabetes Care 1999;22:904–907.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blaum CS, Velez L, Hiss RG, Halter JB. Characteristics related to poor glycemic control in NIDDM patients in community practice. Diabetes Care 1997;20: 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harmel AP, Ryan D, Thompson R. Glycohemoglobin assessment program:Glycated hemoglobin and epidemiologic variables in patients with type 2 diabetes. Endocr Pract 2002;8:184–190.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shorr RI, Franse LV, Resnick HE, Di Bari M, Johnson KC, Pahor M. Glycemic control of older adults with type 2 diabetes:Findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48:264–267.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Turner RC, Cull CA, Frighi V, Holman RR. Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus:Progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). JAMA 1999;281:2005–2012.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goudswaard AN, Stolk RP, de Valk HW, Rutten GEHM. Improving glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without insulin therapy. Diabetic Med 2003;20:540–544.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Winocour PH. Effective diabetes care:A need for realistic targets. Br Med J 2002;324:1577–1580.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rothenbacher D, R?ter G, Saam S, Brenner H. Younger patients with type 2 diabetes need better glycaemic control:Results of a community-based study describing factors associated with a high HbA1c value. Br J Gen Pract 2003;53:389–391.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schillinger D, Grumbach K, Piette J, et al. Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA 2002; 288:475–482.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fisher E. Low literacy levels in adults:Implications for patient education. J Contin Educ Nurs 1999;30:56–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Julius Center for Health Science and Primary Care, University Medical Center, P.O. Box 80560, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Alex N. Goudswaard, Ronald P. Stolk, Peter Zuithoff & Guy E.H.M. Rutten

Authors
  1. Alex N. Goudswaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ronald P. Stolk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter Zuithoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guy E.H.M. Rutten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex N. Goudswaard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goudswaard, A.N., Stolk, R.P., Zuithoff, P. et al. Patient Characteristics do not Predict Poor Glycaemic Control in type 2 Diabetes Patients Treated in Primary Care. Eur J Epidemiol 19, 541–545 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJEP.0000032351.42772.e7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJEP.0000032351.42772.e7

Search

Navigation