Early Mobilization after Flexor Tendon Repair in Children

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose: Aim of the study was to provide an age-adapted rehabilitation protocol for flexor tendon repairs of children and to evaluate a patient series accordingly. Methods: A modified Kessler's technique was used to repair 49 flexor tendon injuries in 39 children. All children had immediate postoperative mobilization according to the protocol that provides specific guidelines for preschoolers, children and teenagers. Range of motion was monitored and the final results were evaluated retrospectively. Results: All children could be treated successfully according to the protocol with no occurrence of secondary tendon ruptures. Forty finger injuries were evaluated according to the Strickland classification, resulting in a median total active motion of 92.6 % with 29 (72.5 %) excellent results, 8 (20 %) good results, 3 (7.5 %) fair results and no poor result. All 7 thumbs had an excellent result according to the Buck-Gramcko score. There was no significant difference in outcomes between the three age groups. Conclusions: The rehabilitation protocol provided in this study allows an age-adapted early mobilization of children's hands after flexor tendon injuries. It respects age-specific limitations in rehabilitation and takes a child's superior healing capacity compared to adults into account. The good results and the very low complication rate observed in the present series suggest that the extra effort of early mobilization may be justified.

References

• 1 al-Qattan M, Posnick J, Lin K. et al . Fetal tendon healing: development of an experimental model.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;  92 1155-1160
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Berndtsson L, Ejeskär A. Zone II flexor tendon repair in children. A retrospective long term study.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1995;  29 59-64
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Buck-Gramcko D, Dietrich F, Gogge S. [Evaluation criteria in follow-up studies of flexor tendon therapy].  Handchirurgie. 1976;  8 65-69
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Elhassan B, Moran S, Bravo C. et al . Factors that influence the outcome of zone I and zone II flexor tendon repairs in children.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 2006;  31 1661-1666
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Fitoussi F, Mazda K, Frajman J. et al . Repair of the flexor pollicis longus tendon in children.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2000;  82 1177-1180
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Fitoussi F, Lebellec Y, Frajman J. et al . Flexor tendon injuries in children: factors influencing prognosis.  J Pediatr Orthop. 1999;  19 818-821
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Friedrich H, Bäumel D. [The treatment of flexor tendon injuries in children].  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2003;  35 347-352
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Grobbelaar A, Hudson D. Flexor tendon injuries in children.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 1994;  19 696-698
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Kleinert H, Kutz J, Atasoy E. et al . Primary repair of flexor tendons.  Orthop Clin North Am. 1973;  4 865-876
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Lister G, Kleinert H, Kutz J. et al . Primary flexor tendon repair followed by immediate controlled mobilization.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1977;  2 441-451
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Nietosvaara Y, Lindfors N, Palmu S. et al . Flexor tendon injuries in pediatric patients.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 2007;  32 1549-1557
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 O'Connell S, Moore M, Strickland J. et al . Results of zone I and zone II flexor tendon repairs in children.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1994;  19 48-52
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Strickland J, Glogovac S. Digital function following flexor tendon repair in zone II: a comparison of immobilization and controlled passive motion techniques.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1980;  5 537-543
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. Daniel Max Weber

Department of Surgery
University Children's Hospital Zurich

Steinwiesstr. 75

8032 Zurich

Switzerland

Email: daniel.weber@kispi.uzh.ch