Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Weakness in numbers

The challenge of numeracy in health care

  • Editorials
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Health literacy: report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. Ad Hoc committee on health literacy for the council on scientific affairs, American medical association. JAMA. 1999;281:552–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Seligman H, Wang F, Palacios J, Wilson CD, C, Piette J, Schillinger D. Physician notification of their diabetes patients’ limited health literacy: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:1001–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Welch HG. Patients and medical statistics: interest, confidence and ability. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:996–1000.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parker RM, Baker DW, Williams MV, Nurss JR. The test of functional health literacy in adults: a new instrument for measuring patients’ literacy skills. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:537–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams MV, Parker RM, Baker DW, et al. Inadequate functional health literacy among patients at two public hospitals. JAMA. 1995;274:1677–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;CD001431.

  7. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. Risk communication in clinical practice: putting cancer in context. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999;124–33.

  8. Montori V, Leung T, Thompson C, Chung J, Capes S, Smith S. Validation of a diabetes numeracy evaluation tool. Diabetes. 2004;53(suppl 2):A224–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Black WC, Welch HG. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:966–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Montori V, Leung T, Thompson C, Chung J, Capes S, Smith S. Choice of risk representation to enable diabetes decision-making. Diabetes. 2004;53(suppl 2):A225–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality, National Institutes of Health. Understanding and Promoting Health Literacy (R01)—PAR-04-116. Available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-04-116.html. Accessed June 30, 2005.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Editor’s Note: Dr. Rothman currently receives unrestricted research funding support from the NIDDK (DK20593 P&F 6), the American Diabetes Association (NovoNordisk Clinical Research Award), and the Pfizer Clear Health Communication Initiative to examine the role of literacy and numeracy in patients with diabetes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montori, V.M., Rothman, R.L. Weakness in numbers. J GEN INTERN MED 20, 1071–1072 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.051498.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.051498.x

Navigation