Use of a computer to detect and respond to clinical events: its effect on clinician behavior

Ann Intern Med. 1976 Feb;84(2):162-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-84-2-162.

Abstract

A computer was used to prospectively detect and suggest responses to simple, medication-related events as reflected in a computerized record in a prospective, randomized study of a diabetes clinic with primary-care responsibility. There were two categories of event/suggestions: when the last observation of a test required for medication control was too old, the computer suggested a repeat; and when an abnormality with therapeutic implications was detected, the computer suggested a specific change in therapeutics. Clinicians responded to 36% of events in the first category with computer reminders and 11% without (P less than 0.0001); they responded to 28% of events in the second category with computer assistance and 13% without (P less than 0.026). For the most clinically significant of these second category events, the difference was even greater: 47% with and 4% without computer assistance (P less than 0.0004). I believe that computer detection and response (in the form of reminders) to simple clinical events will change clinician behavior.

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Competence*
  • Computers*
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Diabetes Mellitus / drug therapy
  • Humans
  • Hypoglycemic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Insulin / therapeutic use
  • Medical Records*
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies

Substances

  • Hypoglycemic Agents
  • Insulin