The retrospective analysis of bibliographical trends for nine biomedical engineering journals from 1999 to 2007

Ann Biomed Eng. 2009 Jul;37(7):1474-81. doi: 10.1007/s10439-009-9700-7. Epub 2009 Apr 22.

Abstract

For academic research outcomes, there is an increasing emphasis on the bibliometric scorings like the journal impact factor (JIF) when assessment of the quality of research is required. Currently, no known study has been conducted to explore the bibliographical trends of the biomedical engineering journals indexed by the annual Journal Citation Reports of the Thomson Scientific. In this study, the trends of nine reputable journals were selected and analyzed over a 9-year period (year 1999 to year 2007). The results show that the JIF rose exponentially for some journals (up to 597.0%) while for others, it shrank (down to -19.5%). A similar trend is observed for the citations trend over the same period and there was a significant increase in the number of citable articles published (> or =23.6%) in all the selected journals using year 1999 as the base year. However, journals which published significant more non-research articles (> or =10%) saw favorable subsequent effects on their citations. It is postulated that the changes in bibliographical trends can be classified as editorial and non-editorial influences. The retrospective impacts of these influences on the nine selected journals over the 9-year period were also discussed in this study.

MeSH terms

  • Biomedical Engineering / statistics & numerical data*
  • Biomedical Engineering / trends*
  • Databases, Bibliographic / statistics & numerical data*
  • Journal Impact Factor
  • Natural Language Processing
  • Periodicals as Topic / statistics & numerical data*
  • Periodicals as Topic / trends*
  • Retrospective Studies