Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Paper
Photographing human subjects in biomedical disciplines: an Islamic perspective
  1. Salilah Saidun
  1. Correspondence to Dr Salilah Saidun, Department of Science and Technology Studies, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia; s_salilah{at}yahoo.com

Abstract

Visual recording of human subjects is commonly used in biomedical disciplines for clinical, research, legal, academic and even personal purposes. Guidelines on practice standards of biomedical recording have been issued by certain health authorities, associations and journals, but none of the literature discusses this from an Islamic perspective. This article begins with a discussion on the general rules associated with visual recording in Islam, followed by modesty issues in biomedical recording and issues of informed consent and confidentiality. In order to be deemed ethical from the Islamic perspective, all the aforementioned criteria must conform to, or not contradict, Islamic teaching.

  • Religious Ethics
  • Clinical Ethics
  • Confidentiality/Privacy
  • Informed Consent
  • Research Ethics

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Introduction

Biomedical human illustration has been common practice throughout the development of the discipline. The practice, which started with hand drawing, painting, carving and engraving, has evolved in step with technology advances around cameras and film, where black-and-white images and audiovisual taping have led to today's digital imaging. The improving quality of images and the feasibility to adopt clinical recording has meant that it is now convenient and cost-efficient, with widespread availability of digital recording equipment. In tandem with the development of information technology and the simplicity of sharing information, there have increasingly been calls for ethical guidelines and legal regulation, to ensure the beneficial intent surpasses potential detrimental effects of access to technology.

Biomedical images are recorded by various methods, including photography, video recording, x-ray and different types of scans. This article will focus on issues associated with obtaining (the term ‘recording’ will be used from now on) and using images of human subjects involving photography and video recording, while discussion of using scan images, pathological slides or images of internal organs is excluded.

Recordings are commonly used in clinical care and biomedical research to assess disease or treatment progression;1–4 this is most prevalent in the specialties of plastic surgery, wound care, otolaryngology, dermatology and maxillofacial surgery.1 ,2 Images are also commonly used for academic purposes, including publication, training biomedical professionals, and educating the public.2 ,4 The judicial system can require recordings as evidence of an alleged assault.4 ,5 Images are also recorded by biomedical professionals for personal reasons including self-assessment of the procedures undertaken, advertisement of their services,1 ,2 ,4 or even clinically unrelated reasons (eg, ‘just for fun’).1

The literature suggests that there are both detrimental and favourable effects of recording human subjects. The recording may adversely affect subjects’ psychological well-being to varying degrees depending on the subjects’ age and clinical condition, the photographed body parts, the nature of the procedure, and the character of the photographer.2 Furthermore, Brennan5 suggests that perineal images may help patients to see and understand injuries sustained in sexual assaults. Whole-body photography of patients at increased risk of developing melanomas may be beneficial in identifying new lesions, encouraging self-examination and reducing unnecessary biopsies.6

The conventional standards

Several health authorities, associations and journals have issued guidelines on clinical visual recording. A summary of the recommendations follows.7–18

  1. General rules

    1. Trained clinical photographers are preferably employed.

    2. The recording should be stopped (if practicable) at the request of the subject or when the recording might negatively influence patient care.

    3. The recording must be for a requisite purpose. Justification for the procedure or approval by the responsible consultant should be written in the subject's records.

  2. Informed consent

    1. Subjects must receive an explanation about the recording, including the purpose, process, withdrawal of consent, confidentiality and use of the images.

    2. Written consent should be obtained from the patient or his/her legal representatives before the procedure.

    3. Written consent should be obtained for each use of the images. If the initial consent does not include authorisation for a specific intended use, new written consent should be obtained before use of the images.

    4. Consent is also required from patients who appear incidentally on the recording (eg, if they were also present at the location or equipment being recorded).

    5. Consent must be given by the subjects or their legal representatives voluntarily without compulsion.

    6. Subjects have the right to withdraw consent whenever they wish.

    7. Subjects should be advised about the difficulty of controlling the dissemination of images that are published electronically or broadcast on television; thus complete withdrawal of consent is impossible under these circumstances.

    8. In circumstances where recording without informed consent is legally authorised (eg, in non-accidental injury cases), the justification should be written in the patient's record.

  3. Respect for dignity

    1. Subjects’ rights and dignity must be respected, with their cultural and religious background taken into consideration.

    2. Only the minimum necessary area should be photographed.

    3. Unnecessary physical contact must be avoided.

    4. Chaperoning is recommended for all subjects, but strongly advised for recording of prison inmates or unconscious, vulnerable, minor or semi or fully naked subjects of the opposite sex. The presence of a chaperone or the subjects’ refusal for such a presence should be documented.

    5. Images of the perineum or female chest should be used only for medical records and closely controlled biomedical teaching. If it is necessary for them to be used during presentations outside the institution, the images should not be sent in advance or included in handouts or websites.

  4. Respect for confidentiality

    1. Images should be securely retained, with access restricted to authorised personnel with justified reasons for viewing the images.

    2. Images should not be stored in personal devices such as mobile phones, cameras, laptops or digital storage devices. If it is necessary for presentation or teaching purposes, access to the device should be controlled, and the image should be deleted once finished with.

    3. Since shading over the eyes is inadequate in ensuring anonymity, facial images should not be recorded except when essential and after consent is obtained.

    4. Disposal of the records must follow practice standards of patient confidential record disposal.

An Islamic perspective

Rules of general human recording

Muslim jurists’ rulings on human recording vary from permissible to discouraged and forbidden.19 However, the ruling is ultimately dependent on the purpose of the recording, the intended use of the images, the way in which the recording session is conducted, the type of images captured, and potential consequences of the whole experience. For images to be deemed permissible, all of the aforementioned circumstances must not contradict the Shari'ah (Islamic legal system). Figure 1 summarises the criteria considered in order to reach a verdict on the ethical status of clinical visual recording in Islam.

Figure 1

Summary of the criteria that must be considered in making a decision on the ethical status of clinical photography in Islam.

The first principle of law in Islam (qawaid al-fiqhiyyah) states the importance of the underlying intention in determining the ethical status of an action.20 ,21 The intentions of the recording and intended use of the images must be positive from the Islamic viewpoint. Intentions that are deemed negative from the Islamic standpoint would make illegal the recording and use of the images, such as the intention to share photographs with unauthorised individuals, to humiliate the subjects, or other negative intentions. Islamic code of conduct must be observed during the recording sessions, where the rules of modesty and cross-gender interaction apply, which will be discussed in the next section. The consequences of the whole experience are also weighed against the benefits of the process and use of images, where the lesser of two harms is opted for as the ethical choice. This is based on the third principle of law that states that harm must be eliminated.20 ,21

Rules of modesty and cross-gender interaction

Awrah is a body part that is forbidden to be shown to specific individuals, either in person or in photographs. There are various rulings regarding one's awrah before entering adulthood. Al-Zuhaili22 is more inclined towards the rulings of pre-adult awrah that is divided into three categories; under 7 years, between 7 to 10 years and above 10 years. Children under the age of 7 have no awrah while those above 10 years old have awrah similar to adults (if there have not entered adulthood by then). The awrah of boys between 7 to 10 years are the external genitalia and anus, whereas the awrah of same age girls are the trunk, arm and thighs. In Islam, adulthood is indicated by one of the following signs (whichever appears first)22:

  1. Menstruation.

  2. Pregnancy.

  3. Ejaculation.

  4. Presence of pubic hair. (Signs 1–4 are only valid when the individual has reached at least 9 Islamic lunar years of age.)

  5. Attaining 15 Islamic lunar years of age. (Certain scholars assert the upper limit of 17 or 18.)

The awrah of a man in circumstances where he can be seen by other humans is between navel and knee. A woman's awrah is the whole body except the hands and face,23 ,24 and some scholars also include the feet22 when she can be seen by non-mahram (marriageable individuals of the opposite sex). However, Muslim jurists differ in the ruling on the awrah of a Muslim woman when she can be seen by non-Muslim women; some have ruled that it is similar to the awrah in the case of non-mahram, while others have ruled that it is similar to the awrah when she can be seen by Muslim women (between navel and knee).22 ,23 Touching the non-mahram is also forbidden. When two non-mahram individuals of the opposite-sex are together in an enclosed space, a chaperone is necessary to avoid impropriety—actual or alleged (khalwah).23 ,25 The chaperone can be the subject's spouse, mahram (unmarriageable relatives) or a trusted lady,25 who can be a proactive witness who can stop unnecessary inappropriate acts from continuing. These rules are pertinent to both live and deceased subjects.26 However, these rules can be transiently relaxed during threatening circumstances (darurah) to avoid greater harm such as severe pain or death. This follows the fourth Islamic principle of law, where extreme circumstances countermand what is ordinarily impermissible when the permissible alternative is unavailable.20 ,21 Nevertheless, this relaxation is restricted to the essential extent of preserving the absolute necessities of human life (al-daruriyyah)27 as described in the six Purposes of Law (maqasid al-shariah), which are preservation of religion, life, intellect, progeny, property and human dignity.28 Al-Zuhaili27 also specified that, for medical cases, the need to act outside what is ordinarily permissible must be certified by a trustworthy Muslim doctor whose knowledge and piety is respectable, in addition to the above aforementioned criteria. Therefore, using awrah-exposing human images for biomedical research, clinical care and academic purposes may be justified if a trustworthy Muslim specialist certifies that the course itself is essential and there is no alternative method that would serve the same purpose, such as merely describing the condition in written form with or without illustration. In contrast, non-awrah-exposing recordings may be used for other non-requisite purposes that do not contradict Islamic teaching, such as for health education posters or pamphlets that are intended for public distribution.

In the context of biomedical recording, the four following questions relating to awrah have to be considered.

  1. Who is present during the recording session?—The rules of avoiding khalwah and chaperoning apply. If the session involves exposure of awrah, only personnel who are essential for unimpeded performance of the procedure should be present.

  2. How much is exposed?—The subject's awrah must be covered except when exposure is necessary in darurah situations. If the awrah must be exposed, only the minimum necessary area is uncovered at one time.

  3. How much is visually recorded?—Awrah and unique personal identifiers must not be visually recorded. If this is essential, only the minimum necessary part may be recorded.

  4. Who can view the images?—The data must be retained in a secure environment with restricted access. Visual recordings of awrah parts and unique individual identifiers may be seen only by essential personnel in the research, clinical care or academic programme.

Rules of informed consent

The principle of autonomy is understood to be a universal principle with some degree of theoretical and practical variance across different cultures and religions.29 Although the principle of autonomy is acknowledged in Islam,29 ,30 the right is restricted by Islamic law. Autonomy is only applicable for actions that are permissible in Islamic teachings where an individual should not inflict on himself, his own property and honour, actions that are deemed forbidden, as the rights of God supersede individual rights.29 An individual's right to autonomy may also be limited by societal rights, which are given greater emphasis and priority in Islam.29

The Islamic law regarding contract (al-‘aqd) has been exhaustively discussed by Muslim scholars. In summary, the rules pertaining to entering into an agreement or contract are as follows.30–32

  1. Sighah (method of manifesting the intention to contract) is divided into ijab (offer) and qabul (acceptance). Sighah may be performed verbally, in writing or implied (by action), and must fulfil the following criteria:

    1. Comprehended by all parties involved. An interpreter may be beneficial in obtaining informed consent from patients whose native language is not that used in the contract.

    2. Offer and acceptance are congruous and occur simultaneously in one event.

  2. The contracting parties (all parties involved in the contract) must fulfil two conditions:

    1. All parties must maintain full legal consenting competency until acceptance of the contract is confirmed. A person who has reached puberty and maturity (al-rushd), and is not mentally challenged, insane, unconscious or drunk, retains full competency. For temporary incompetency, the contract must be delayed until full competency is regained. If the contract cannot be delayed or the incompetency is permanent, decisions are made by the guardian or the judicial authority.

    2. All parties must act autonomously without coercion.

  3. The subject matter of the contract can either be an item or a service, and must fulfil the following criteria:

    1. It is recognised as having a value that is recognised from the Islamic viewpoint.

    2. It is legal in civil law and Islamic law.

    3. The item or service exists and belongs to the offering party. The offering party has the ability to transfer possession of the item or execute the service.

    4. There is a detailed definition concerning the quantity, quality, characteristics and value of the contracted item or service which is known to all parties to the extent that it will avoid any dispute between the parties. Thus, for clinical recordings, the subjects must be properly informed with material information regarding the procedure, including the purpose, process, body parts that will be recorded, withdrawal of consent, data storage, data retrieval, copyrights and specific uses of the images.

Rules of maintaining confidentiality

Protecting confidentiality has a vital significance in Islam. A number of revelation texts in the Quran and Hadith accentuate the importance of avoiding negative conversations about other people in their absence (backbiting) even if the facts discussed are true and even after they have died (Sahih Muslim,33 Al-Hujurat 49:1234). These acts are analogous to eating deceased human flesh (Al-Hujurat 49:1234), and committing such an act would incur suffering in the ‘Hereafter’ (Bukhari,35 Sunan Abu Dawud36).

Showing subjects’ clinical physical signs through recorded images may be vital in training future health professionals. As stated, it may become permissible with consent from the particular patients, where an explanation is given of how it will be used in lectures or for publication. Even if a patient has consented, the images should be used with discretion and only for essential purposes and audiences. If absence of the images does not impede the intended cause, then they must be omitted.

In specific circumstances in Islam, an individual can be lawfully authorised to release negative information about specific individuals. One such circumstance is disclosing confidential information when a legal verdict regarding a situation is sought. Certain circumstances demand breech of patients’ confidentiality in order to protect a number of other individuals or society as a whole. Breach of confidentiality under these circumstances may be justifiable in Islam for the greater benefit (maslahah). Examples include reporting probable criminal acts (such as domestic violence, assault or child abuse), serious communicable diseases or conditions that threaten others’ lives (such as epileptic patients who work as drivers).37

Comparing Islamic and conventional standards for clinical photography

The two ethical standards differ with regard to some criteria, but also share certain similar measures. The rules of informed consent and maintaining confidentiality are analogous in the two ethical standards. The conventional standards of avoiding unnecessary touching and minimising the photographed area are akin to those of Islam. Conventional standards strongly recommend the use of a chaperone in the presence of semi or fully naked subjects of the opposite sex, while the Islamic standard obligates the use of chaperones whenever a photographer is dealing with a subject of the opposite sex in an enclosed space, regardless of the extent and area of exposure. Conventional standards also limit images of the perineum and female chest to use for clinical records and closely controlled biomedical teaching, whereas, in Islam, this restriction is extended to all body parts that are considered awrah. Although conventional standards limit clinical photography to requisite situations, the Islamic definition of ‘what is requisite’ is more stringent when awrah is involved.

Conclusion

The Islamic ethical standards of clinical recording address the purpose of the recording, the nature of the image-recording session, the type of image, informed consent, maintenance of confidentiality, the consequences of the recording session, and the subsequent use of the images. Non-awrah-exposing images that do not involve other unique personal identifiers are less problematic. In contrast, recording of images that involve awrah exposure are unethical, as is storing, using and viewing them, even if the patient gives their consent. The only exception is when a trustworthy Muslim specialist certifies that there is a threat to the patient, where circumstances dictate that such practices are essential in order to avoid greater detriments and no permissible alternative is available. These rules, which apply to both living and deceased subjects, must not contradict Islamic teaching to be deemed ethical from an Islamic perspective. Despite this, an individual Muslim's perception of the rules and associated practice may vary. Therefore it is advisable to ascertain each subject's preferences or expectations of the clinical photography session, and obtain consent for the storage and use of the recordings made.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks go to Associate Professor Dr Anke Iman Bouzenita (Department of Fiqh and Usul al-Fiqh, International Islamic University of Malaysia) for her comments on the manuscript during revision and to Dr Auni Aslah Mat Daud (Department of Mathematics, University Malaysia Terengganu) for his assistance during construction of the flow chart.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it was published online first. Extra text was added to the ‘Rules of modesty and cross-gender interaction’ section of the paper, reference citations was corrected and reference 22 and 24 was updated.

Other content recommended for you