Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
CorrespondenceCorrespondence
Open Access

Comment on: Fracture risk assessment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Ali S. Jawad
Saudi Medical Journal September 2022, 43 (9) 1066; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2022.43.9.20220601
Ali S. Jawad
Consultant, Department of Rheumatology The Royal London Hospital London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor

I have read with interest the study by Alsaedi et al.1 Type 1 diabetes mellitus (TIDM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are associated with increased risk of fractures irrespective of bone mineral density (BMD). There is an increase in fractures at proximal femur, proximal humerus and the ankle with increased postoperative mortality of up to 57% in women and 28% in men.2 We agree with Alfadhli et al1 that the fracture risk assessment (FRAX) tool underestimates fracture risk T2DM, more so if bone mineral density (BMD) is included. Though T1DM is considered in Fracture Risk Algorithm (FRAX) under secondary osteoporosis, evidence suggests that fracture risk is also underestimated.2

There are other fracture risk assessment tools that are well validated; the United Kingdom (UK) QFracture and the Australian Garvan Fracture Risk calculator.

QFracture incorporates both T1DM and T2DM and hence an alternative to FRAX in assessing fracture risk in patients with diabetes.3 QFracture®-2016 risk calculator can be accessed on http://qfracture.org. It is recommended for use in England, Scotland, and Wales. It gives a 10-year probability of fracture, and unlike FRAX, it can be used for people between the age of 33 and 99 and it does not include BMD which is an advantage as BMD tends to be higher in patients with T2DM. It does include falls, an important contributor to increased fracture risk in patients with diabetes. There are at least 2 limitations to the use of QFracture in diabetes. It needs direct evaluation in patients with diabetes and calibration in populations outside the UK.

The Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator is another tool and can used.4 Five key risk factors for fracture are included: a person’s age, weight, BMD, a history of previous fractures and a history of falls.5 Using this information, an algorithm of risk forms the basis of the calculator tool and is useful in patients with diabetes as it includes falls, but again more direct evaluations in patients with T1 & 2DM is required.

More collaborative international research is needed to improve the predictive value of fracture risk assessment tools and the incorporation of both types of diabetes as a risk factor in current and future fracture predictive tools.

Reply from the Author

No reply was received from the Author.

  • Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal

This is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Alfadhli EM,
    2. Alsharif AS,
    3. Alharbi RA,
    4. Alalawi SS,
    5. Darandari SE,
    6. Alsaedi SA,
    7. Alharbi SO.
    Comparison of bone mineral density and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Saudi women with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. Saudi Med J 2022; 43: 700–707.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Agarwal A,
    2. Leslie WD.
    Fracture prediction tools in diabetes Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2022; 29: 326–332.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hippisley-Cox J
    , Coupland. Predicting risk of osteoporotic fracture in men and women in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QFracture Scores. BMJ 2009; 339: b4229.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Garvan Institute Medical Research. Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator. [Udpated 2022]. Available from: https://garvan.org.au
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bolland MJ,
    2. Siu AT,
    3. Mason BH et al.
    Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan fracture risk calculators in older women. J Bone Miner Res 2011; 26: 420–407.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 43 (9)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 43, Issue 9
1 Sep 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comment on: Fracture risk assessment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Comment on: Fracture risk assessment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Ali S. Jawad
Saudi Medical Journal Sep 2022, 43 (9) 1066; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.9.20220601

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comment on: Fracture risk assessment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Ali S. Jawad
Saudi Medical Journal Sep 2022, 43 (9) 1066; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.9.20220601
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Management of trigger finger (stenosing tenosynovitis)
  • Comment on: Post surgical hypoparathyroidism
  • Overcoming socioeconomic obstacles is important in achieving equity in health care
Show more Correspondence

Similar Articles

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire