Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
In This IssueAbstract
Open Access

In this issueSYSTEMATIC REVIEWORIGINAL ARTICLESCASE REPORT

Saudi Medical Journal July 2021, 42 (7) 705;
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Comparison of ondansetron and tropisetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Wang et al compare the efficacy of prophylactic ondansetron and tropisetron for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Two independent investigators extracted relevant data from the included studies. The primary outcome was PONV, while additional outcomes included the requirement of antiemetic treatment and the related complications. The final pooled analysis included 14 studies totaling 1705 patients and indicated that ondansetron was 39% less effective than tropisetron in preventing postoperative vomiting with a higher incidence of dizziness. However, no significant difference was detected between ondansetron and tropisetron in PONV, postoperative nausea, antiemetic treatment, and headache. They conclude that tropisetron is superior to ondansetron in preventing postoperative vomiting.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Forest plot of comparison of the side effects experienced by patients receiving ondansetron and tropisetron treatment: A) headache and B) dizziness

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

HspX-mediated survival pathways of pathogenic mycobacteria

Alhusain optimize an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for measuring the HspX protein (α-crystallin) levels and then evaluate its correlation with the accumulation of lipid bodies in Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) during hypoxia and exposure to nitric oxide. During the optimization, non-specific binding was ruled out by eliminating various components individually. Experiments were also conducted to optimize the concentration of the monoclonal primary detection antibody (anti-Acr1) and the HRP-conjugated detection antibody. The incubation time and temperature were also optimized. They conclude that the optimized ELISA protocol in this study can detect HspX protein levels in M. bovis growing in normal and hypoxic environments. Importantly, hypoxia led to enhanced expression of HspX protein, which correlated with the enhanced production of lipid bodies.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Total protein concentration of Mycobacterium bovis on exposure to spermine-nitric oxide and spermine hydrochloride. Sp.NO: spermine-nitric oxide, Sp.HCl: spermine hydrochloride

see page 721

The impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on the development of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in Saudi Arabia

Alateeq et al explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the development of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms and its correlation with the level of perceived stress among the Saudi population. Most participants were female (73.9%) with a university level of education or higher (81%). The prevalence of new-onset obsessions was 57.8%, compulsions 45.9%, and moderate/high perceived stress 72.4%. A significantly higher level of perceived stress was reported among those in the 18-29 age group, females, singles, participants with no children, students, non-smokers, those who were unemployed, living with families, diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder, living in the northern region, quarantine discipliners, and those who spent 60 or more days in quarantine. They conclude that this study revealed a significantly higher prevalence of high perceived stress in respondents with new-onset OCD contamination symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. This implies that a biodisaster is associated with high psychological morbidity.

see page 750

CASE REPORT

Kawasaki disease in an infant after administration of hexavalent vaccine

Almeshary presents a 4-month-old Saudi infant with an unremarkable antenatal and perinatal history. At the age of 4 months, he presented to the emergency department with a 9-day history of fever. He was in his usual state of good health until he developed fever 8 hours post-hexavalent vaccine (DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib). His temperature started suddenly and was measured at home as 38.9°C axillary by his mother with no clear focus. A laboratory investigation upon admission showed a white blood cell count of 17.4 ×103 cells/ul with 52% neutrophils, hemoglobin level of 11 g/dL, mean corpuscular hemoglobin level of 27, mean corpuscular volume of 80, platelets of 600/μL, C-reactive protein level of 96 mg/L, erythrocyte segmentation rate of 91 mm/h, and albumin level of 19.9 g/L. The author cannot hypothesize that hexavalent vaccination is a trigger for KD based on a single case report, and the association observed in this child may have been coincidental.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Echocardiogram A) from high parasternal view showing significant dilatation of left main cornary artery (LCA), B) parasternal short axis view showing significant dilatation of left anterior descending artery (LAD). AO: aorta; PA: pulmonary artery; LCX: left circumflex artery

see page 790

  • Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal

This is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 42 (7)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 42, Issue 7
1 Jul 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In this issueSYSTEMATIC REVIEWORIGINAL ARTICLESCASE REPORT
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
In this issueSYSTEMATIC REVIEWORIGINAL ARTICLESCASE REPORT
Saudi Medical Journal Jul 2021, 42 (7) 705;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
In this issueSYSTEMATIC REVIEWORIGINAL ARTICLESCASE REPORT
Saudi Medical Journal Jul 2021, 42 (7) 705;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • In this issueSystematic ReviewOriginal ArticlesCase Report
  • In this issueSystematic ReviewOriginal Articles
  • In this issueClinical GuidelinesOriginal Articles
Show more Abstract

Similar Articles

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire