Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
AbstractAbstract
Open Access

In this issueREVIEW ARTICLEORIGINAL ARTICLESCASE REPORT

Saudi Medical Journal May 2019, 40 (5) 423;
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

REVIEW ARTICLE

Quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in Saudi journals from 1997 to 2017

Natto & AlGhamdi conclude that the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in Saudi journals was distributed in all categories (low, medium, and high) and it can be improved using critical evaluation by authors, journal editors, and readers. The search uncovered 201 unique articles; of these, the researchers screened 110 full texts and included 103 in this review. Most of the included studies were published in Saudi Medical Journal (50 articles, 48.5%), followed by Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology (21 articles, 20.4%), and Annals of Saudi Medicine (16 articles, 15.5%).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Frequency of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in each selected Saudi journal from 1997 to 2017 (N=103)

see page 426

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

The prognostic significance of p63 cytoplasmic expression in colorectal cancer

Albasri et al conclude that p63 expression increased from normal to adenoma to carcinoma sequence. Moreover, p63 cytoplasmic expression seems to be related to high Ki67 indexing, K-ras expression, advanced tumor stage and poor clinical outcome of CRC. These findings suggest a significant role of cytoplasmic p63 expression in tumor progression and prognosis. P63 over-expression was absent in normal mucosa, while 12.5% cases of adenoma showed its over-expression. In CRC, p63 expression was high in 24.1% of cases. There were no significant correlations between p63 expression and gender, tumor location, tumor size and tumor histologic differentiation. However, high p63 expression revealed a significant correlation with age, tumor type, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion (p=0.006), distant metastasis, high Ki67 expression, and K-ras expression.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Colorectal carcinoma showing intense cytoplasmic expression of p63 in tumor cells

see page 432

Modelling risk assessment for cervical cancer in symptomatic Saudi women

Al-Madani et al assess whether the utility of cervical cancer screening could be improved by combining multiple factors in addition to the pap test. A high risk of cervical cancer in Saudi women was associated with 4 risk factors: family history, vaginal bleeding, hypertension, and an abnormal pap smear test. The model yields an adequate utility with acceptable goodness-of-fit. The pap smear test alone is inadequate to assess high risk for cervical cancer in our center. Early detection of cervical cancer may require consideration of a combination of factors including the pap test. This study has shown that using a combination of abnormal family history, vaginal bleeding, hypertension, and the pap smear test improved the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Differences in receiver operating characteristics curves between the risk prediction model and individual factors

see page 447

CASE REPORT

Mixed epithelial and stromal tumor of the kidney on 18F-FDG PET/CT in a 21-year-old female

Tian & Cui presented a 21-year-old female and the tumor of the kidney was unexpectedly found with no obvious clinical symptoms during a physical examination. Axial enhanced abdominal CT showed a mass of 46×56×81 mm in the lower pole of the left kidney that was composed of solid and cystic components. A heterogeneous delayed enhancement was found in this mass. 18F-labeled fluoro-2-deoxy glucose PET/CT imaging showed mild FDG uptake in the mass of the left kidney and no abnormal foci in other locations in MIP. Delayed abdominopelvic PET/CT scan still revealed mild FDG uptake in the mass.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Iimmunohistochemical showing positive hematoxylin and eosin

see page 499

  • Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 40 (5)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 40, Issue 5
1 May 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In this issueREVIEW ARTICLEORIGINAL ARTICLESCASE REPORT
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
In this issueREVIEW ARTICLEORIGINAL ARTICLESCASE REPORT
Saudi Medical Journal May 2019, 40 (5) 423;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
In this issueREVIEW ARTICLEORIGINAL ARTICLESCASE REPORT
Saudi Medical Journal May 2019, 40 (5) 423;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • In this issueSystematic ReviewOriginal ArticlesCase Report
  • In this issueSystematic ReviewOriginal Articles
  • In this issueClinical GuidelinesOriginal Articles
Show more Abstract

Similar Articles

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire