Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
OtherStudent Corner
Open Access

Assessment of shared decision-making from the patient’s perspective

Mashael A. Al-Askar and Asmaa Alyaemni
Saudi Medical Journal January 2015, 36 (1) 123; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.1.10690
Mashael A. Al-Askar
From the College of Business Administration, Department of Health and Hospital Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MHHA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Asmaa Alyaemni
From the College of Business Administration, Department of Health and Hospital Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives: To determine to which extent shared decision-making (SDM) is perceived in Saudi hospitals, and assess the willingness of the patients to participate in medical care decision making.

Methods: A cross sectional study using a non-probability technique (convenience sample) was carried out between March and April 2013 in a tertiary hospital among patients attending the Family and Community Medicine Department, and those who visited the Admission Office in the Surgery Department of Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. We distributed our questionnaires using a non probability technique. Out of 450 questionnaires distributed, 327 were valid and coded in the data. To assess the decision making process between the patient’s and physicians we used a standardized international scale called shared decision-making (SDM-9) items.‎ The data was then entered and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 18 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Verbal approval was obtained from the correspondents to participate in this study.

Results: The sample represents patients mostly from the middle age group, range between 26-45 years, well-educated, and from the middle socio-economic group. The study shows a high score of SDM, ranging between 4.40 ± 1.3 to the highest score of 4.60 ± 1.1. The total dimension scores was 4.54 ± 0.84. The results also show a high degree of willingness ‎to participate in decision making (4.98 ± 0.9), and a desire, expressed by patients, to be aware of their health condition (5.02 ± 0.91). Almost all the participants agreed to utilize other communication facilities, such as mobile applications, Twitter, and others (5.16 ± 0.9).

Conclusion: The level of SDM was highly fulfilled by the perception of patients in our sample. Additionally, the patients also look for other effective communication facilities, enhanced, and developed by the management of the hospital.

Student Corner

We invite students from a variety of medical disciplines to submit original contributions based on their supervised research.

The Student Corner of Saudi Med J aims to help students explore research opportunities and network with other peers and mentors in the same field.

Submission Guidelines

Submitted Abstracts should include the following:

  • Title should be descriptive

  • Author’s names and affiliation(specify college level/year, academic degree of Senior Author)

  • Abstract must be structured and not more than 300 words

  • The following are the typical headings:

    • Objectives (background, why the study was done, specific aims)

    • Methods (setting, date of study, design, subjects, intervention and analysis)

    • Results (findings, data and statistical tests) and

    • Conclusion (general interpretation of results)

General Information on Abstract Submission

Submitted Abstracts should be co-authored by a Senior Supervisor

Abstracts will be reviewed by Student’s Corner Section Editor

There is no fee to submit an Abstract

Ethical Approval should provided

Footnotes

  • Disclosure Authors have no conflict of interests, and the work was not supported or funded by any drug company. Mashael Al-Askar is a member of the Editorial Team, and was therefore excluded from any final editorial decisions regarding this paper.

  • Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 36 (1)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 36, Issue 1
1 Jan 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of shared decision-making from the patient’s perspective
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Assessment of shared decision-making from the patient’s perspective
Mashael A. Al-Askar, Asmaa Alyaemni
Saudi Medical Journal Jan 2015, 36 (1) 123; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2015.1.10690

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assessment of shared decision-making from the patient’s perspective
Mashael A. Al-Askar, Asmaa Alyaemni
Saudi Medical Journal Jan 2015, 36 (1) 123; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2015.1.10690
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Demography and diagnosis of patients encountered at Qassim University Polyclinics, Central Saudi Arabia
  • Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome among Qassim school teachers, and its impact on their performance and life duties
  • Attitudes and beliefs on organ donation among students in a university in Central Saudi Arabia
Show more Student Corner

Similar Articles

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire