Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the therapeutic outcome and prognostic factors in patients with non-metastatic esophageal carcinoma.
METHODS: Between January 1989 and December 2003, 171 patients with non-metastatic esophageal carcinoma patients were retrospectively assessed in the Department of Radiation and Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Turkey.
RESULTS: The distribution of the stage at presentation designated 39 stage II patients (23%) and 132 stage III patients (77%). The primary tumors were treated with surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in 29 patients (17%), with surgery, postoperative RT and chemotherapy (CT) in 17 patients (10%), with radical RT in 40 patients (23%), and with RT and CT in 47 patients (27%). Fourteen patients (8%) did not receive any postoperative adjuvant treatment. Two and three-year survival rates of the whole group were 27.0% and 14.8%, respectively. Clinical staging was the only statistically significant prognostic factor by multivariate analyses (p=0.04). Median survivals by the treatment groups were 12.5 months for surgery alone, 16 months for surgery plus postoperative RT, 15 months in surgery plus postoperative chemoradiotherapy, 9 months in radical RT alone and 17 months in chemoradiotherapy group. Survival advantage was not demonstrated for postoperative RT or RT plus CT. Outcomes were similar between the patients treated with surgery and with chemoradiotherapy (p=0.54). Patients treated with chemoradiotherapy had a longer survival than patients treated with only RT (p=0.05).
CONCLUSION: The most important prognostic factor was the stage of the disease. Survival advantage was not demonstrated for postoperative RT or RT plus CT. Outcomes were similar between patients treated by surgery and by chemoradiotherapy.
- Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.