Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

The comparison of ProSeal and I-gel laryngeal mask airways in anesthetized adult patients under controlled ventilation

Osman Ekinci, Süheyla Abitagaoglu, Güldem Turan, Zübeyir Sivrikaya, Gülşen Bosna and Asu Özgultekin
Saudi Medical Journal January 2015, 36 (4) 432-436; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.4.10050
Osman Ekinci
From the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Haydarpasa Numune Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Süheyla Abitagaoglu
From the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Haydarpasa Numune Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Güldem Turan
From the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Haydarpasa Numune Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zübeyir Sivrikaya
From the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Haydarpasa Numune Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gülşen Bosna
From the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Haydarpasa Numune Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Asu Özgultekin
From the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Haydarpasa Numune Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Shin WJ,
    2. Cheong YS,
    3. Yang HS,
    4. Nishiyama T
    (2010) The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 27:598–601.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Theiler LG,
    2. Kleine-Brueggeney M,
    3. Kaiser D,
    4. Urwyler N,
    5. Luyet C,
    6. Vogt A,
    7. et al.
    (2009) Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 111:55–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Teoh WH,
    2. Lee KM,
    3. Suhitharan T,
    4. Yahaya Z,
    5. Teo MM,
    6. Sia AT
    (2010) Comparison of the LMA Supreme vs the i-gel in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with controlled ventilation. Anaesthesia 65:1173–1179.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Gatward JJ,
    2. Cook TM,
    3. Seller C,
    4. Handel J,
    5. Simpson T,
    6. Vanek V,
    7. et al.
    (2008) Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia 63:1124–1130.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Michalek P,
    2. Donaldson WJ,
    3. Hinds JD
    (2009) Tongue trauma associated with the I-gel supraglottic airway. Anaesthesia 64:692–693.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Campbell J,
    2. Michalek P,
    3. Deighan M
    (2009) I-gel supraglottic airway for rescue airway management and as a conduit for tracheal intubation in a patient with acute respiratory failure. Resuscitation 80:963.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Bordes M,
    2. Semjen F,
    3. Meymat Y,
    4. Zaghet B,
    5. Suriray I,
    6. Cros AM
    (2006) Clinical study of the laryngeal mask in paediatric. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-classic. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 25:806–810.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Theiler LG1,
    2. Kleine-Brueggeney M,
    3. Kaiser D,
    4. Urwyler N,
    5. Luyet C,
    6. Vogt A,
    7. et al.
    (2009) Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the I-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 111:55–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Sahin A,
    2. Tüfek A,
    3. Cingü AK,
    4. Caça I,
    5. Tokgöz O,
    6. Balsak S
    (2012) The effect of I-gel™ airway on intraocular pressure in pediatric patients who received sevoflurane or desflurane during strabismus surgery. Paediatr Anaesth 22:772–775.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Lee JR,
    2. Kim MS,
    3. Kim JT,
    4. Byon HJ,
    5. Park YH,
    6. Kim HS,
    7. et al.
    (2012) A randomised trial comparing the I-gel (TM) with the LMA Classic (TM) in children. Anaesthesia 67:606–611.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Tokgöz O,
    2. Tüfek A,
    3. Beyaz SG,
    4. Yüksel MU,
    5. Çelik F,
    6. Aycan İÖ,
    7. et al.
    (2013) Comparison of the efficacies of I-gel and LMA-ProSeal for airway management in pediatric patients. Turk J Med Sci 43:208–213.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Fernández Díez A,
    2. Pérez Villafañe A,
    3. Bermejo González JC,
    4. Marcos Vidal JM
    (2009) [Supreme laryngeal mask airway vs the I-gel supraglottic airway in patients under general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation with no neuromuscular block: a randomized clinical trial]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 56:474–478, Spanish.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Schmidbauer W,
    2. Bercker S,
    3. Volk T,
    4. Bogusch G,
    5. Mager G,
    6. Kerner T
    (2009) Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic and ProSeal using a cadaver model. Br J Anaesth 102:135–139.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Bamgbade OA,
    2. Macnab WR,
    3. Khalaf WM
    (2008) Evaluation of the i-gel airway in 300 patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 25:865–866.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Beylacq L,
    2. Bordes M,
    3. Semjen F,
    4. Cros AM
    (2009) The I-gel, a single-use supraglottic airway device with a non-inflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53:376–379.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Janakiraman C,
    2. Chethan DB,
    3. Wilkes AR,
    4. Stacey MR,
    5. Goodwin N
    (2009) A randomised crossover trial comparing the I-gel supraglottic airway and classic laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 64:674–678.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Gibbison B,
    2. Cook TM,
    3. Seller C
    (2008) Case series: Protection from aspiration and failure of protection from aspiration with the I-gel airway. Br J Anaesth 100:415–417.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Gatward JJ,
    2. Thomas MJ,
    3. Nolan JP,
    4. Cook TM
    (2008) Effect of chest compressions on the time taken to insert airway devices in a manikin. Br J Anaesth 100:351–356.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Keijzer C,
    2. Buitelaar DR,
    3. Efthymiou KM,
    4. Srámek M,
    5. ten Cate J,
    6. Ronday M,
    7. et al.
    (2009) A comparison of postoperative throat and neck complaints after the use of the I-gel and the La Premiere disposable laryngeal mask: a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Anesth Analg 109:1092–1095.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 36 (4)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 36, Issue 4
1 Jan 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The comparison of ProSeal and I-gel laryngeal mask airways in anesthetized adult patients under controlled ventilation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
The comparison of ProSeal and I-gel laryngeal mask airways in anesthetized adult patients under controlled ventilation
Osman Ekinci, Süheyla Abitagaoglu, Güldem Turan, Zübeyir Sivrikaya, Gülşen Bosna, Asu Özgultekin
Saudi Medical Journal Jan 2015, 36 (4) 432-436; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2015.4.10050

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The comparison of ProSeal and I-gel laryngeal mask airways in anesthetized adult patients under controlled ventilation
Osman Ekinci, Süheyla Abitagaoglu, Güldem Turan, Zübeyir Sivrikaya, Gülşen Bosna, Asu Özgultekin
Saudi Medical Journal Jan 2015, 36 (4) 432-436; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2015.4.10050
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Errata
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Comparing performance of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and I-gel in anesthetized adult patients
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Longitudinal analysis of foodborne disease outbreaks in Saudi Arabia
  • Psychological stress and its association with bronchial asthma in Saudi Arabia
  • The factors affecting comfort and the comfort levels of patients hospitalized in the coronary intensive care unit
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire