Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
AbstractAbstract
Open Access

In this issueREVIEW ARTICLEORIGINAL ARTICLES

Saudi Medical Journal June 2015, 36 (6) 657;
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

REVIEW ARTICLE

Combining antiangiogenic therapy and radiation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

This study discusses the mechanisms of the synergistic effect of antiangiogenic therapy with radiation therapy in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and reviews the data supporting this strategy as a promising treatment for metastatic NPC. The complicated mechanisms between antiangiogenic agents and radiation involve many interactions between the cancer cells, vasculature, and cancer stroma. The proliferation and metastasis of cancer depends on angiogenesis, while rapid growth of cancers will cause hypoxia, which contributes to radioresistance. Antiangiogenic agents can modulate the cancer blood flow and oxygenation through target cancer vasculature, leading to increased radiosensitivity.

see page 659

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Association of total antioxidants level with glaucoma type and severity

Mousa et al conclude that plasma total antioxidant status (TAS) levels are decreased in patients with glaucoma, more so in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma than primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG), supporting the hypothesis that decreased antioxidative defense and/or increased oxidative stress may have a critical role in the pathogenesis of glaucoma. They found that there was a significant correlation between TAS and age at onset (Pearson correlation coefficient [R] 0.17, p<0.0001), cup/disc ratio (R: -0.13, p=0.004), and number of anti-glaucoma medications (R: -0.16, p=0.001). Moreover, the TAS levels were significantly different across the 3 types of glaucoma: 0.86±0.24 in PEG, 0.47±0.32 in POAG, and 0.98±0.41 in PACG (all p<0.0001).

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Mean ± standard deviation of total antioxidant concentration for different types of glaucoma. PEG - pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, POAG - primary open angle glaucoma, PACG - primary angle closure glaucoma, TAS - total antioxidant status

see page 671

Impact of maternal and neonatal factors on parameters of hematopoietic potential in umbilical cord blood

Al-Deghaither concludes that in the selection and identification of a possible donor of umbilical cord blood, several maternal and neonatal factors should be considered, as younger maternal age, neonatal birth weight >3300 grams, larger placental size, and first or second-born babies, were shown to be associated with higher total nucleated cells (TNC’s), cluster designation (CD)34+, CD45+, nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) count, and viability. The volume was positively affected by bigger birth weight of the baby (p<0.0001), larger placenta (p=0.001), TNCs (p<0.0001), CD34+ (p<0.0001), NRBCs (p<0.0001), and viability (p=0.002). There were no statistically significant differences between baby boys and girls for laboratory variables.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Summary of 206 laboratory results umbilical cord blood units (donor and baby) from the cord blood bank

see page 704

Prevalence of spinal disorders and their relationships with age and gender

Alshami concludes that spinal disorders were common compared with other disorders. Low back pain and neck pain were the most common spinal disorders. Age and gender were weakly related to some of the disorders that affected the lumbar and cervical spine. The most common disorders affected the lumbar spine (53.1%) and cervical spine (27.1%), and pain was the most common disorder. Neck pain (60.5%) was more common in patients <30 years old (p<0.001). Cervical spondylosis was common (~30%) in the >30 age groups. Spondylosis and low back pain were more prevalent in women (7.8% and 76.2%) than in men (73.9% and 3.3%).

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Numbers of disorders categorized by spinal region and year

see page 725

  • Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 36 (6)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 36, Issue 6
1 Jun 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In this issueREVIEW ARTICLEORIGINAL ARTICLES
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
In this issueREVIEW ARTICLEORIGINAL ARTICLES
Saudi Medical Journal Jun 2015, 36 (6) 657;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
In this issueREVIEW ARTICLEORIGINAL ARTICLES
Saudi Medical Journal Jun 2015, 36 (6) 657;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • In this issueSystematic ReviewOriginal ArticlesCase Report
  • In this issueSystematic ReviewOriginal Articles
  • In this issueClinical GuidelinesOriginal Articles
Show more Abstract

Similar Articles

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire