Comparison of posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using finite element analysis

References

1. ↵
   1. Barbagallo GM,
   2. Albanese V,
   3. Raich AL,
   4. Dettori JR,
   5. Sherry N,
   6. Balsano M

   (2014) Lumbar lateral interbody fusion (LLIF): Comparative effectiveness and safety versus PLIF/TLIF and predictive factors affecting LLIF outcome. Evid Based Spine Care J 5:28–37.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Lee GW,
   2. Lee SM,
   3. Ahn MW,
   4. Kim HJ,
   5. Yeom JS

   (2014) Comparison of posterolateral lumbar fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for patients younger than 60 Years with isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:E1475–E1480.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Audat Z,
   2. Moutasem O,
   3. Yousef K,
   4. Mohammad B

   (2012) Comparison of clinical and radiological results of posterolateral fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine. Singapore Med J 53:183–187.

   OpenUrlPubMed
4. ↵
   1. Kunze B,
   2. Drasseck T,
   3. Kluba T

   (2011) Posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF) for the treatment of localised segment degeneration of lumbar spine. Z Orthop Unfall 149:312–316.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. ↵
   1. Zhang Q,
   2. Yuan Z,
   3. Zhou M,
   4. Liu H,
   5. Xu Y,
   6. Ren Y

   (2014) A comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15:367.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Hey HW,
   2. Hee HT

   (2010) Lumbar degenerative spinal deformity: Surgical options of PLIF, TLIF and MI-TLIF. Indian J Orthop 44:159–162.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. ↵
   1. Sim HB,
   2. Murovic JA,
   3. Cho BY,
   4. Lim TJ,
   5. Park J

   (2010) Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments. J Neurosurg Spine 12:700–708.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. ↵
   1. Tang S,
   2. Rebholz BJ

   (2011) Does anterior lumbar interbody fusion promote adjacent degeneration in degenerative disc disease?A finite element study. J Orthop Sci 16:221–228.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. ↵
   1. Tang S,
   2. Meng X

   (2011) Does disc space height of fused segment affect adjacent degeneration in ALIF?a finite element study. Turk Neurosurg 21:296–303.

   OpenUrlPubMed
10. ↵
    1. Xu H,
    2. Tang H,
    3. Guan X,
    4. Jiang F,
    5. Xu N,
    6. Ju W,
    7. et al.

    (2013) Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis. Neurosurgery 72(1 Suppl):21–26.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Xu JP,
    2. Yi HL,
    3. Li M,
    4. Shi ZC,
    5. Li JF,
    6. Zhao YC,
    7. et al.

    (2013) [Clinical application of Wallis interspinous dynamic stabilization in treating adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after lumbar spinal fusion]. Zhongguo Gu Shang 26:1005–1009, Chinese.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Ren C,
    2. Song Y,
    3. Liu L,
    4. Xue Y

    (2014) Adjacent segment degeneration and disease after lumbar fusion compared with motion-preserving procedures: a meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24(Suppl1):S245–S253.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Tang S

    (2012) Does TLIF aggravate adjacent segmental degeneration more adversely than ALIF? A finite element study. Turk Neurosurg 22:324–328.

    OpenUrlPubMed
14. ↵
    1. Ekman P,
    2. Moller H,
    3. Shalabi A,
    4. Yu YX,
    5. Hedlund R

    (2009) A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 18:1175–1186.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Stavridis SI,
    2. Bucking P,
    3. Schaeren S,
    4. Jeanneret B,
    5. Schnake KJ

    (2010) Implant removal after posterior stabilization of the thoraco-lumbar spine. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:119–123.

    OpenUrl