Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
LetterCorrespondence
Open Access

Comparing performance of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and I-gel in anesthetized adult patients

Jia-Qiang Zhang, Fan-Min Meng, Fu-Shan Xue and Rui-Ping Li
Saudi Medical Journal September 2015, 36 (9) 1130-1131; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.9.12889
Jia-Qiang Zhang
Department of Anesthesiology, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fan-Min Meng
Department of Anesthesiology, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fu-Shan Xue
Department of Anesthesiology, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rui-Ping Li
Department of Anesthesiology, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ekinci O,
    2. Abitagaoglu S,
    3. Turan G,
    4. Sivrikaya Z,
    5. Bosna G,
    6. Özgultekin A
    (2015) The comparison of ProSeal and I-gel laryngeal mask airways in anesthetized adult patients under controlled ventilation. Saudi Med J 36:432–436.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Behringer EC,
    2. Kristensen MS
    (2011) Evidence for benefit vs novelty in new intubation equipment. Anaesthesia 66(Suppl 2):57–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Das B,
    2. Mitra S,
    3. Samanta A,
    4. Samal RK
    (2014) A comparative study of three methods of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion in children with simulated difficult laryngoscopy using a rigid neck collar. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 52:110–113.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Li CW,
    2. Xue FS,
    3. Xu YC,
    4. Liu Y,
    5. Mao P,
    6. Liu KP,
    7. et al.
    (2007) Cricoid pressure impedes insertion of, and ventilation through, the ProSeallaryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, paralyzed patients. Anesth Analg 104:1195–1198.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Jaensson M,
    2. Olowsson LL,
    3. Nilsson U
    (2010) Endotracheal tube size and sore throat following surgery: a randomized-controlled study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 54:147–153.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Mohr S,
    2. Weigand MA,
    3. Hofer S,
    4. Martin E,
    5. Gries A,
    6. Walther A,
    7. et al.
    (2013) Developing the skill of laryngeal mask insertion: prospective single center study. Anaesthesist 62:447–452.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Nagata T,
    2. Kishi Y,
    3. Tanigami H,
    4. Hiuge Y,
    5. Sonoda S,
    6. Ohashi Y,
    7. et al.
    (2012) Oral gastric tube-guided insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask is an easy and noninvasive method for less experienced users. J Anesth 26:531–535.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Pournajafian A,
    2. Alimian M,
    3. Rokhtabnak F,
    4. Ghodraty M,
    5. Mojri M
    (2015) Success rate of airway devices insertion: laryngeal mask airway versus supraglottic gel device. Anesth Pain Med 5:e22068.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Chauhan G,
    2. Nayar P,
    3. Seth A,
    4. Gupta K,
    5. Panwar M,
    6. Agrawal N
    (2013) Comparison of clinical performance of the I-gel with LMA proseal. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 29:56–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Chen M,
    3. Li Q
    (2012) The ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway is more effective than the LMA-Classic in pediatric anesthesia: a meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth 24:639–646.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Mokhtar AM,
    2. Choy CY
    (2013) Postoperative sore throat in children: comparison between proseal LMA and classic LMA. Middle East J Anaesthesiol 22:65–70.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 36 (9)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 36, Issue 9
1 Sep 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparing performance of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and I-gel in anesthetized adult patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Comparing performance of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and I-gel in anesthetized adult patients
Jia-Qiang Zhang, Fan-Min Meng, Fu-Shan Xue, Rui-Ping Li
Saudi Medical Journal Sep 2015, 36 (9) 1130-1131; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2015.9.12889

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparing performance of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and I-gel in anesthetized adult patients
Jia-Qiang Zhang, Fan-Min Meng, Fu-Shan Xue, Rui-Ping Li
Saudi Medical Journal Sep 2015, 36 (9) 1130-1131; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2015.9.12889
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Management of trigger finger (stenosing tenosynovitis)
  • Comment on: Post surgical hypoparathyroidism
  • Overcoming socioeconomic obstacles is important in achieving equity in health care
Show more Correspondence

Similar Articles

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire