Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Review ArticleReview Article
Open Access

The impact of health information technology on patient safety

Yasser K. Alotaibi and Frank Federico
Saudi Medical Journal December 2017, 38 (12) 1173-1180; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2017.12.20631
Yasser K. Alotaibi
From the Continuous Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Department (Alotaibi), Medical Services General Directorate, Ministry of Defense, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Department of Patient Safety (Federico), Institute for Health Care Improvement, Cambridge Massachusetts, United States of America
SBFM, ABFM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Frank Federico
From the Continuous Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Department (Alotaibi), Medical Services General Directorate, Ministry of Defense, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Department of Patient Safety (Federico), Institute for Health Care Improvement, Cambridge Massachusetts, United States of America
RPh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Patient Safety Dictionary [Internet] Natoinal Patient Safety Foundation, Available from: http://www.npsf.org/?page=dictionarynz. [Update 2017; Accessed 2017 September].
  2. ↵
    1. Kohn LT,
    2. Corrigan JM,
    3. Donaldson MS
    To Err Is Human [Internet], Available from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9728. [cited 2000].
  3. ↵
    Crossing the Quality Chasm [Internet], Available from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10027. [cited 2001].
  4. ↵
    1. Brailer D
    The decade of health information technology, Framework for Strategic Action [Internet], Available from: http://www.providersedge.com/ehdocs/ehr_articles/the_decade_of_hit-delivering_customer-centric_and_info-rich_hc.pdf. [cited 2004].
  5. ↵
    Computerized Provider Order Entry [Internet] Agency for Healthcare Quality & Research, Available from: https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primers/primer/6/. [cited 2017].
  6. ↵
    1. Nuckols TK,
    2. Smith-Spangler C,
    3. Morton SC,
    4. Asch SM,
    5. Patel VM,
    6. Anderson LJ,
    7. et al.
    (2014) The effectiveness of computerized order entry at reducing preventable adverse drug events and medication errors in hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 3:56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Devine EB,
    2. Hansen RN,
    3. Wilson-Norton JL,
    4. Lawless NM,
    5. Fisk AW,
    6. Blough DK,
    7. et al.
    (2010) The impact of computerized provider order entry on medication errors in a multi specialty group practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc 17:78–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Kaushal R,
    2. Kern LM,
    3. Barron Y,
    4. Quaresimo J,
    5. Abramson EL
    (2010) Electronic prescribing improves medication safety in community-based office practices. J Gen Intern Med United States 25:530–536.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Strom BL,
    2. Schinnar R,
    3. Aberra F,
    4. Bilker W,
    5. Hennessy S,
    6. Leonard CE,
    7. et al.
    (2010) Unintended effects of a computerized physician order entry nearly hard-stop alert to prevent a drug interaction: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 170:1578–1583.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Dainty KN,
    2. Adhikari NKJ,
    3. Kiss A,
    4. Quan S,
    5. Zwarenstein M
    (2012) Electronic prescribing in an ambulatory care setting: a cluster randomized trial. J Eval Clin Pract 18:761–767.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Clinical Decision Support (CDS) [Internet]
    Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/policy-researchers-implementers/clinical-decision-support-cds.
  12. ↵
    1. Shojania KG,
    2. Jennings A,
    3. Mayhew A,
    4. Ramsay CR,
    5. Eccles MP,
    6. Grimshaw J
    (2009) The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD001096.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Shah NR,
    2. Seger AC,
    3. Seger DL,
    4. Fiskio JM,
    5. Kuperman GJ,
    6. Blumenfeld B,
    7. et al.
    (2006) Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 13:5–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Paterno MD,
    2. Maviglia SM,
    3. Gorman PN,
    4. Seger DL,
    5. Yoshida E,
    6. Seger AC,
    7. et al.
    (2009) Tiering drug-drug interaction alerts by severity increases compliance rates. J Am Med Inform Assoc 16:40–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. van Wyk JT,
    2. van Wijk MAM,
    3. Sturkenboom MCJM,
    4. Mosseveld M,
    5. Moorman PW,
    6. van der Lei J
    (2008) Electronic alerts versus on-demand decision support to improve dyslipidemia treatment: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Circulation 117:371–378.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Roshanov PS,
    2. Fernandes N,
    3. Wilczynski JM,
    4. Hemens BJ,
    5. You JJ,
    6. Handler SM,
    7. et al.
    (2013) Features of effective computerised clinical decision support systems: meta-regression of 162 randomised trials. BMJ 346:f657.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Joint Commssion International Accreditation Standards for Hospitals
    (2014) The Joint Commission, 23.
  18. ↵
    1. Popovich D
    (2011) 30-Second Head-to-Toe Tool in Pediatric Nursing: Cultivating Safety in Handoff Communication. Pediatr Nurs 37:55–59.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Davis J,
    2. Riesenberg LA,
    3. Mardis M,
    4. Donnelly J,
    5. Benningfield B,
    6. Youngstrom M,
    7. et al.
    (2015) Evaluating outcomes of electronic tools supporting physician shift-to-shift handoffs: A Systematic Review. J Grad Med Educ 7:174–180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Li P,
    2. Ali S,
    3. Tang C,
    4. Ghali WA,
    5. Stelfox HT
    (2013) Review of computerized physician handoff tools for improving the quality of patient care. J Hosp Med 8:456–463.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Khammarnia M,
    2. Kassani A,
    3. Eslahi M
    (2015) The Efficacy of Patients'Wristband Bar-code on Prevention of Medical Errors: A Meta-analysis Study. Appl Clin Inform 6:716–727.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Leung AA,
    2. Denham CR,
    3. Gandhi TK,
    4. Bane A,
    5. Churchill WW,
    6. Bates DW,
    7. et al.
    (2015) A safe practice standard for barcode technology. J Patient Saf 11:89–99.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. U.S. Food & Drug Adminsitration
    Infusion Pump: Glossary, Available from: https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/GeneralHospitalDevicesandSupplies/InfusionPumps/ucm202502.htm#smartpump. [Update 2016 February 23].
  24. ↵
    1. Rothschild JM,
    2. Keohane CA,
    3. Cook EF,
    4. Orav EJ,
    5. Burdick E,
    6. Thompson S,
    7. et al.
    (2005) A controlled trial of smart infusion pumps to improve medication safety in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 33:533–540.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Ohashi K,
    2. Dalleur O,
    3. Dykes PC,
    4. Bates DW
    (2014) Benefits and risks of using smart pumps to reduce medication error rates: a systematic review. Drug Saf 37:1011–1120.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Chapuis C,
    2. Roustit M,
    3. Bal G,
    4. Schwebel C,
    5. Pansu P,
    6. David-Tchouda S,
    7. et al.
    (2010) Automated drug dispensing system reduces medication errors in an intensive care setting. Crit Care Med 38:2275–2281.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Hempel S,
    2. Maggard M,
    3. Nguyen D
    Prevention of wrong site surgery, retained surgical items, and surgical fires: A systematic review [Internet], Available from: https://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/publications/esp/wrong-site.pdf. [Updated 2013].
  28. ↵
    1. Shekelle PG,
    2. Wachter RM,
    3. Pronovost PJ,
    4. Schoelles K,
    5. McDonald KM,
    6. Dy SM,
    7. et al.
    (2013) Making health care safer II: an updated critical analysis of the evidence for patient safety practices. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 211:1–945.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
    What is a patient portal? Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/faqs/what-patient-portal. [cited 2008 July 20].
  30. ↵
    1. Nagykaldi Z,
    2. Aspy CB,
    3. Chou A,
    4. Mold JW
    (2012) Impact of a Wellness Portal on the delivery of patient-centered preventive care. J Am Board Fam Med 25:158–167.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Fiks AG,
    2. Mayne SL,
    3. Karavite DJ,
    4. Suh A,
    5. O'Hara R,
    6. Localio AR,
    7. et al.
    (2015) Parent-reported outcomes of a shared decision-making portal in asthma: a practice-based RCT. Pediatrics 135:e965–e973.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Kruse CS,
    2. Bolton K,
    3. Freriks G
    (2015) The effect of patient portals on quality outcomes and its implications to meaningful use: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 17:e44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Daniel H,
    2. Sulmasy L
    (2015) Physicians for the H and PPC of the AC of Policy recommendations to guide the use of telemedicine in primary care settings: An american college of physicians position paper. Ann Intern Med 163:787–789.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Tan K,
    2. Lai NM
    (Jun, 2012) Telemedicine for the support of parents of high-risk newborn infants. Cochrane database Syst Rev. England 6:CD006818.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kew KM,
    2. Cates CJ
    (2016) Remote versus face-to-face check-ups for asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD011715.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Gregersen TL,
    2. Green A,
    3. Frausing E,
    4. Ringbaek T,
    5. Brondum E,
    6. Suppli Ulrik C
    (2016) Do telemedical interventions improve quality of life in patients with COPD?A systematic review. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 11:809–822.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Salmoiraghi A,
    2. Hussain S
    (2015) A Systematic Review of the Use of Telepsychiatry in Acute Settings. J Psychiatr Pract 21:389–393.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Hofstetter PJ,
    2. Kokesh J,
    3. Ferguson AS,
    4. Hood LJ
    (2010) The impact of telehealth on wait time for ENT specialty care. Telemed J E Health 16:551–556.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Olayiwola JN,
    2. Anderson D,
    3. Jepeal N,
    4. Aseltine R,
    5. Pickett C,
    6. Yan J,
    7. et al.
    (2016) Electronic consultations to improve the primary care-specialty care interface for cardiology in the medically underserved: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med 14:133–140.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Klersy C,
    2. Boriani G,
    3. De Silvestri A,
    4. Mairesse GH,
    5. Braunschweig F,
    6. Scotti V,
    7. et al.
    (2016) Effect of telemonitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices on healthcare utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 18:195–204.
    OpenUrl
    1. Inglis SC,
    2. Clark RA,
    3. McAlister FA,
    4. Ball J,
    5. Lewinter C,
    6. Cullington D,
    7. et al.
    (2010) Structured telephone support or telemonitoring programmes for patients with chronic heart failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD007228.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Lieber BA,
    2. Taylor B,
    3. Appelboom G,
    4. Prasad K,
    5. Bruce S,
    6. Yang A,
    7. et al.
    (2015) Meta-analysis of telemonitoring to improve HbA1c levels: promise for stroke survivors. J Clin Neurosci 22:807–811.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kew KM,
    2. Cates CJ
    (2016) Home telemonitoring and remote feedback between clinic visits for asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD011714.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Omboni S,
    2. Guarda A
    (2011) Impact of home blood pressure telemonitoring and blood pressure control: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Am J Hypertens 24:989–998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Cheung A,
    2. van Velden FHP,
    3. Lagerburg V,
    4. Minderman N
    (2015) The organizational and clinical impact of integrating bedside equipment to an information system: a systematic literature review of patient data management systems (PDMS). Int J Med Inform 84:155–165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Savage SW,
    2. Schneider PJ,
    3. Pedersen CA
    (2005) Utility of an online medication-error-reporting system. Am J Health Syst Pharm 62:2265–2270.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Stavropoulou C,
    2. Doherty C,
    3. Tosey P
    (2015) How effective are incident-reporting systems for improving patient safety? Milbank Q 93:826–866.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Campanella P,
    2. Lovato E,
    3. Marone C,
    4. Fallacara L,
    5. Mancuso A,
    6. Ricciardi W,
    7. et al.
    (2016) The impact of electronic health records on healthcare quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Public Health 26:60–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Sittig DF,
    2. Singh H
    (2010) A New Socio-technical Model for Studying Health Information Technology in Complex Adaptive Healthcare Systems. Qual Saf Health Care 19(Suppl 3):i68–i74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    (2015) Safe use of health information technology. Sentinel Event Alert 54:1–6.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 38 (12)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 38, Issue 12
1 Dec 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The impact of health information technology on patient safety
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
The impact of health information technology on patient safety
Yasser K. Alotaibi, Frank Federico
Saudi Medical Journal Dec 2017, 38 (12) 1173-1180; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2017.12.20631

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The impact of health information technology on patient safety
Yasser K. Alotaibi, Frank Federico
Saudi Medical Journal Dec 2017, 38 (12) 1173-1180; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2017.12.20631
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Facilitators and barriers in the use of the electronic consultation register for Integrated Management of Childhood Illness in the health district of Toma, Burkina Faso: Perspectives of health care providers
  • Hospitalisations related to nervous-system diseases in Australia, 1998-2019: a secular trend analysis
  • Systematic literature review of adopting eHealth in pharmaceutical care during COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations for strengthening pharmacy services
  • Status of patient safety in selected Ghanaian hospitals: a national cross-sectional study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Harnessing artificial intelligence for infection control and prevention in hospitals
  • Effects of antidiabetic drugs on the level of serum uric acid in patients who have type 2 diabetes
  • The future of personalized medicine in Saudi Arabia
Show more Review Article

Similar Articles

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire