Operative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy

References

1. ↵
   1. Zargar H,
   2. Allaf ME,
   3. Bhayani S,
   4. Stifelman M,
   5. Rogers C,
   6. Ball MW,
   7. et al.

   (2015) Trifecta and optimal perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in surgical treatment of small renal masses:a multi-institutional study. BJU Int 116:407–414.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Choi JE,
   2. You JH,
   3. Kim DK,
   4. Rha KH,
   5. Lee SH

   (2015) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 67:891–901.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. ↵
   1. Ghani KR,
   2. Sukumar S,
   3. Sammon JD,
   4. Rogers CG,
   5. Trinh QD,
   6. Menon M

   (2014) Practice patterns and outcomes of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy since the introduction of robotic partial nephrectomy:results from the nationwide inpatient sample. J Urol 191:907–912.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. ↵
   1. Ellison JS,
   2. Montgomery JS,
   3. Wolf JSJ,
   4. Hafez KS,
   5. Miller DC,
   6. Weizer AZ

   (2012) A matched comparison of perioperative outcomes of a single laparoscopic surgeon versus a multisurgeon robot-assisted cohort for partial nephrectomy. J Urol 188:45–50.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. ↵
   1. Levey AS,
   2. Bosch JP,
   3. Lewis JB,
   4. Greene T,
   5. Rogers N,
   6. Roth D

   (1999) A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine:a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 130:461–470.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Benway BM,
   2. Bhayani SB,
   3. Rogers CG,
   4. Dulabon LM,
   5. Patel MN,
   6. Lipkin M,
   7. et al.

   (2009) Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors:a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol 182:866–872.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 1. Scoll BJ,
   2. Uzzo RG,
   3. Chen DYT,
   4. Boorjian SA,
   5. Kutikov A,
   6. Manley BJ,
   7. et al.

   (2010) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy:a large single-institutional experience. Urology 75:1328–1334.

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. 1. Kaouk JH,
   2. Khalifeh A,
   3. Hillyer S,
   4. Haber GP,
   5. Stein RJ,
   6. Autorino R

   (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy:step-by-step contemporary technique and surgical outcomes at a single high-volume institution. Eur Urol 62:553–561.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. 1. Tanagho YS,
   2. Kaouk JH,
   3. Allaf ME,
   4. Rogers CG,
   5. Stifelman MD,
   6. Kaczmarek BF,
   7. et al.

   (2013) Perioperative complications of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy:analysis of 886 patients at 5 United States centers. Urology 81:573–579.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Ficarra V,
    2. Minervini A,
    3. Antonelli A,
    4. Bhayani S,
    5. Guazzoni G,
    6. Longo N,
    7. et al.

    (2014) A multicentre matched-pair analysis comparing robot-assisted versus open partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 113:936–941.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. 1. Minervini A,
    2. Vittori G,
    3. Antonelli A,
    4. Celia A,
    5. Crivellaro S,
    6. Dente D,
    7. et al.

    (2014) Open versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy:a multicenter comparison study of perioperative results and complications. World J Urol 32:287–293.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. 1. Oh JJ,
    2. Byun S,
    3. Hong SK,
    4. Jeong CW,
    5. Lee SE

    (2014) Comparison of robotic and open partial nephrectomy:Single-surgeon matched cohort study. Can Urol Assoc J 8:E471–E475.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Kim JH,
    2. Park YH,
    3. Kim YJ,
    4. Kang SH,
    5. Byun SS,
    6. Kwak C,
    7. et al.

    (2015) Perioperative and long-term renal functional outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy:a multicenter matched-pair comparison. World J Urol 33:1579–1584.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Lista G,
    2. Buffi NM,
    3. Lughezzani G,
    4. Lazzeri M,
    5. Abrate A,
    6. Mistretta A,
    7. et al.

    (2015) Margin, ischemia, and complications system to report perioperative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy:a European Multicenter Observational Study (EMOS project). Urology 85:589–595.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Maddox M,
    2. Mandava S,
    3. Liu J,
    4. Boonjindasup A,
    5. Lee BR

    (2015) Robotic partial nephrectomy for clinical stage T1b tumors:intermediate oncologic and functional outcomes. Clin Genitourin Cancer 13:94–99.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
16. 1. Abdel Raheem A,
    2. Alatawi A,
    3. Kim DK,
    4. Sheikh A,
    5. Alabdulaali I,
    6. Han WK,
    7. et al.

    (2016) Outcomes of high-complexity renal tumours with a Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA) score of >10 after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with a median 46.5-month follow-up:a tertiary centre experience. BJU Int 118:770–778.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Janda G,
    2. Deal A,
    3. Yang H,
    4. Nielsen M,
    5. Smith A,
    6. Pruthi RS,
    7. et al.

    (2016) Single-Institution Experience with Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Masses Greater Than 4 cm. J Endourol 30:384–389.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Peyronnet B,
    2. Seisen T,
    3. Oger E,
    4. Vaessen C,
    5. Grassano Y,
    6. Benoit T,
    7. et al.

    (2016) Comparison of 1800 Robotic and Open Partial Nephrectomies for Renal Tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 23:4277–4283.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Potretzke AM,
    2. Potretzke TA,
    3. Knight BA,
    4. Vetter J,
    5. Park AM,
    6. Anderson G,
    7. et al.

    (2016) Tumor diameter accurately predicts perioperative outcomes in T1 renal cancer treated with robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. World J Urol 34:1643–1650.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Xie Y,
    2. Ma X,
    3. Gu L,
    4. Li H,
    5. Lv X,
    6. Gao Y,
    7. et al.

    (2016) Associating the learning curve and tumor anatomical complexity with the margins, ischemia, and complications rate after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Int J Surg Lond Engl 36:219–224.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Han KS,
    2. Song GH,
    3. You D,
    4. Song C,
    5. Jeong IG,
    6. Hong JH,
    7. et al.

    (2017) Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic vs robot-assisted laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy in patients with T1 renal masses. J Endourol 31:374–379.

    OpenUrl
22. 1. Luciani LG,
    2. Chiodini S,
    3. Mattevi D,
    4. Cai T,
    5. Puglisi M,
    6. Mantovani W,
    7. et al.

    (2017) Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy provides better operative outcomes as compared to the laparoscopic and open approaches:results from a prospective cohort study. J Robot Surg 11:333–339.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. 1. Maurice MJ,
    2. Ramirez D,
    3. Kara O,
    4. Malkoc E,
    5. Nelson RJ,
    6. Fareed K,
    7. et al.

    (2017) Optimum outcome achievement in partial nephrectomy for T1 renal masses:a contemporary analysis of open and robot-assisted cases. BJU Int 120:537–543.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Moskowitz EJ,
    2. Paulucci DJ,
    3. Reddy BN,
    4. Blum KA,
    5. Rosen DC,
    6. Abaza R,
    7. et al.

    (2017) Predictors of medical and surgical complications after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy:An analysis of 1139 patients in a multi-institutional kidney cancer database. J Endourol 31:223–238.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Paulucci DJ,
    2. Abaza R,
    3. Eun DD,
    4. Hemal AK,
    5. Badani KK

    (2017) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy:continued refinement of outcomes beyond the initial learning curve. BJU Int 119:748–754.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Veeratterapillay R,
    2. Addla SK,
    3. Jelley C,
    4. Bailie J,
    5. Rix D,
    6. Bromage S,
    7. et al.

    (2017) Early surgical outcomes and oncological results of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy:a multicentre study. BJU Int 120:550–555.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Dube H,
    2. Bahler CD,
    3. Sundaram CP

    (2015) The learning curve and factors affecting warm ischemia time during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Indian J Urol 31:223–228.

    OpenUrl