Online polarity-dependent effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on motor speed and fine manual dexterity

References

1. ↵
   1. Witter L,
   2. De Zeeuw CI

   (2015) Regional functionality of the cerebellum. Curr Opin Neurobiol 33:150–155.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. ↵
   1. van Dun K,
   2. Bodranghien FCAA,
   3. Mariën P,
   4. Manto MU

   (2016) tDCS of the Cerebellum Where Do We Stand in 2016?Technical Issues and Critical Review of the Literature. Front Hum Neurosci 10:199.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Schmahmann JD

   (1998) Dysmetria of thought. Clinical consequences of cerebellar dysfunction on cognition and affect. Trends Cogn Sci 2:362–371.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Schmahmann JD,
   2. Sherman JC

   The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain 998 121(Pt 4):561–579.
5. ↵
   1. Grimaldi G,
   2. Argyropoulos GP,
   3. Boehringer A,
   4. Celnik P,
   5. Edwards MJ,
   6. Ferrucci R,
   7. et al.

   (2014) Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation - A consensus paper. Cerebellum 13:121–138.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Ugawa Y,
   2. Day BL,
   3. Rothwell JC,
   4. Thompson PD,
   5. Merton P,
   6. Marsden CD

   (1991) Modulation of motor cortical excitability by electrical stimulation over the cerebellum in man. J Physiol 441:57–72.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Galea JM,
   2. Vazquez A,
   3. Pasricha N,
   4. Orban De Xivry JJ,
   5. Celnik P

   (2011) Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning:The motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns. Cereb Cortex 21:1761–1770.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 1. Ferrucci R,
   2. Giannicola G,
   3. Rosa M,
   4. Fumagalli M,
   5. Boggio PS,
   6. Hallett M,
   7. et al.

   (2012) Cerebellum and processing of negative facial emotions:Cerebellar transcranial DC stimulation specifically enhances the emotional recognition of facial anger and sadness. Cogn Emot 26:786–799.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. ↵
   1. Cantarero G,
   2. Spampinato D,
   3. Reis J,
   4. Ajagbe L,
   5. Thompson T,
   6. Kulkarni K,
   7. et al.

   (2015) Cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances on-line motor skill acquisition through an effect on accuracy. J Neurosci 35:3285–3290.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. ↵
    1. Ferrucci R,
    2. Cortese F,
    3. Priori A

    (2015) Cerebellar tDCS:How to Do It. Cerebellum 14:27–30.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Nitsche MA,
    2. Paulus W

    (2000) Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 527:633–639.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Stagg CJ,
    2. Nitsche MA

    (2011) Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neurosci 17:37–53.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Hamada M,
    2. Strigaro G,
    3. Murase N,
    4. Sadnicka A,
    5. Galea JM,
    6. Edwards MJ,
    7. et al.

    (2012) Cerebellar modulation of human associative plasticity. J Physiol 590:2365–2374.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. ↵
    1. McCreery DB,
    2. Agnew WF,
    3. Yuen TG,
    4. Bullara L

    (1990) Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 37:996–1001.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Parazzini M,
    2. Rossi E,
    3. Ferrucci R,
    4. Liorni I,
    5. Priori A,
    6. Ravazzani P

    (2014) Modelling the electric field and the current density generated by cerebellar transcranial DC stimulation in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 125:577–584.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
16. ↵
    1. Batson MA,
    2. Petridou N,
    3. Klomp DWJ,
    4. Frens MA,
    5. Neggers SFW

    (2015) Single session imaging of cerebellum at 7 tesla:Obtaining structure and function of multiple motor subsystems in individual subjects. PLoS One 10:1–26.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. ↵
    1. Kuper M,
    2. Thurling M,
    3. Stefanescu R,
    4. Maderwald S,
    5. Roths J,
    6. Elles HG,
    7. et al.

    (2012) Evidence for a motor somatotopy in the cerebellar dentate nucleus--an FMRI study in humans. Hum Brain Mapp 33:2741–2749.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Mottolese C,
    2. Richard N,
    3. Harquel S,
    4. Szathmari A,
    5. Sirigu A,
    6. Desmurget M

    (2013) Mapping motor representations in the human cerebellum. Brain 136:330–342.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Lindenberg R,
    2. Renga V,
    3. Zhu LL,
    4. Nair D,
    5. Schlaug G

    (2010) Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology 75:2176–2184.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
20. ↵
    1. Stoodley CJ

    (2012) The cerebellum and cognition:evidence from functional imaging studies. Cerebellum 11:352–365.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Rabe K,
    2. Livne O,
    3. Gizewski ER,
    4. Aurich V,
    5. Beck A,
    6. Timmann D,
    7. et al.

    (2009) Adaptation to Visuomotor Rotation and Force Field Perturbation Is Correlated to Different Brain Areas in Patients With Cerebellar Degeneration. J Neurophysiol 101:1961–1971.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Christova M,
    2. Rafolt D,
    3. Gallasch E

    (2015) Cumulative effects of anodal and priming cathodal tDCS on pegboard test performance and motor cortical excitability. Behav Brain Res 287:27–33.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Fagerlund AJ,
    2. Freili JL,
    3. Danielsen TL,
    4. Aslaksen PM

    (2015) No effect of 2 mA anodal tDCS over the M1 on performance and practice effect on grooved pegboard test and trail making test B. eNeuro 2:1–10.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
24. ↵
    1. Wessel MJ,
    2. Zimerman M,
    3. Timmermann JE,
    4. Heise KF,
    5. Gerloff C,
    6. Hummel FC

    (2016) Enhancing consolidation of a new temporal motor skill by cerebellar noninvasive stimulation. Cereb Cortex 26:1660–1667.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
25. ↵
    1. Boehringer A,
    2. Macher K,
    3. Dukart J,
    4. Villringer A,
    5. Pleger B

    (2013) Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation modulates verbal working memory. Brain Stimul 6:649–653.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Van Wessel BWV Claire,
    2. Verhage M,
    3. Holland P,
    4. Frens MA,
    5. Van Der Geest JN

    (2016) Cerebellar tDCS does not affect performance in the N-back task. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 38:319–326.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Herwig U,
    2. Satrapi P,
    3. Schonfeldt-Lecuona C

    (2003) Using the international 10-20 EEG system for positioning of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Topogr 16:95–99.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Ferrucci R,
    2. Brunoni AR,
    3. Parazzini M,
    4. Vergari M,
    5. Rossi E,
    6. Fumagalli M,
    7. et al.

    (2013) Modulating human procedural learning by cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation. Cerebellum 12:485–492.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Veale JF

    (2014) Edinburgh Handedness Inventory - Short Form:a revised version based on confirmatory factor analysis. Laterality 19:164–177.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
30. ↵
    1. Barut C,
    2. Kızıltan E,
    3. Gelir E,
    4. Köktürk F

    (2013) Advanced analysis of finger-tapping performance:a preliminary study. Balkan Med J 30:167–171.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Piper BJ,
    2. Mueller ST,
    3. Geerken AR,
    4. Dixon KL,
    5. Kroliczak G,
    6. Olsen RHJ,
    7. et al.

    (2015) Reliability and validity of neurobehavioral function on the psychology experimental building language test battery in young adults. Peer J 3:e1460.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Wang YC,
    2. Magasi SR,
    3. Bohannon RW,
    4. Reuben DB,
    5. McCreath HE,
    6. Bubela DJ,
    7. et al.

    (2011) Assessing dexterity function:a comparison of two alternatives for the NIH Toolbox. J Hand Ther 24:313–320.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. ↵
    1. Bhadra N,
    2. Kilgore KL

    (2004) Direct current electrical conduction block of peripheral nerve. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 12:313–324.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. ↵
    1. Parikh PJ,
    2. Cole KJ

    (2014) Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in combination with motor practice on dexterous grasping and manipulation in healthy older adults. Physiol Rep 2:e00255.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text