Validation and inter-rater reliability testing of the Arabic version of speech intelligibility rating among children with cochlear implant

References

1. ↵
   1. Bhamjee A,
   2. Roux TL,
   3. Schlemmer K,
   4. Perold J,
   5. Cass N,
   6. Schroeder K,
   7. et al.

   (2019) Parent-perceived challenges related to the pediatric cochlear implantation process and support services received in South Africa. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 126:109635.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Bruijnzeel H,
   2. Ziylan F,
   3. Stegeman I,
   4. Topsakal V,
   5. Grolman W

   (2016) A systematic review to define the speech and language benefit of early (<12 months) pediatric cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurotol 21:113–126.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Wilkinson AS,
   2. Brinton JC

   (2003) Speech intelligibility rating of cochlear implanted children:inter-rater reliability. Cochlear Implants Int 4:22–30.

   OpenUrlPubMed
4. ↵
   1. Shrout PE,
   2. Fleiss JL

   (1979) Intraclass correlations:Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Calmels M-N,
   2. Saliba I,
   3. Wanna G,
   4. Cochard N,
   5. Fillaux J,
   6. Deguine O,
   7. et al.

   (2004) Speech perception and speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 68:347–351.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Sousa VD,
   2. Rojjanasrirat W

   (2010) Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research:a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract 17:268–724.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Allen C,
   2. Nikolopoulos TP,
   3. Dyar D,
   4. O'donoghue GM

   (2001) Rliability of a rating scale for measuring speech intelligibility after pediatric cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 22:631–633.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Doyle J

   (1987) Reliability of audiologists'ratings of the intelligibility of hearing-impaired children's speech. Ear Hear 8:170–174.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. ↵
   1. Samar VJ,
   2. Metz DE

   (1988) Criterion validity of speech intelligibility rating-scale procedures for the hearing-impaired population. J Speech Lang Hear Res 31:307–316.

   OpenUrlPubMed
10. ↵
    1. Robbins AM,
    2. Osberger MJ

    (1991) American Speech-Language and Hearing Association, Atlanta, Meaningful use of speech scale (muss). Updated 1991, Available from URL: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Robbins+AM%2C+Osberger+MJ+%281991%29+Meaningful+use+of+speech+scale+%28muss%29.+American+Speech-Language+and+Hearing+Association%2C+Atlanta&btnG=.
11. ↵
    1. Al-Shawi Y,
    2. Mesallam TA,
    3. Alfallaj R,
    4. Aldrees T,
    5. Albakheet N,
    6. Alshawi M,
    7. et al.

    (2020) Inter-rater reliability and validity of the Arabic version of Categories of Auditory Performance-II (CAP-II) among children with cochlear implant. Otol Neurotol 41:e597–e602.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Liu R,
    2. Jiao Q,
    3. Ji F,
    4. Wang Q,
    5. Zhao H,
    6. Li J,
    7. et al.

    (2019) The use of the MUSS and the SIR scale in late-implanted prelingually deafened adolescents and adults as a subjective evaluation. Acta Otolaryngol 140:94–98.

    OpenUrl