Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

The effect of laryngoscope types on hemodynamic response and optic nerve sheath diameter

McCoy, Macintosh, and C-MAC video-laryngoscope

Gamze Küçükosman, Bengü G. Aydın, Necla Gülçek, Rahşan D. Okyay, Özcan Pişkin and Hilal Ayoğlu
Saudi Medical Journal September 2020, 41 (9) 930-937; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2020.9.25349

References

  1. ↵
    1. Butterworth IV JF,
    2. Mackey DC,
    3. Wasnick JD
    (2013) Morgan &Mikhail's Clinical Anesthesiology, Airway Management (McGraw Hill, New York), 5th edn, pp 309–341.
  2. ↵
    1. Shribman AJ,
    2. Smith G,
    3. Achola KJ
    (1987) Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 59:295–299.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Mallick A,
    2. Klein H,
    3. Moss E
    (1996) Prevention of cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 77:296–297.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Stone DJ,
    2. Gal TJ
    (2000) Airway Management.In Miller RD ed. Anesthesia (Churchill Livingstone, NewYork (NY)), 5th ed, 1444–1445.
  5. ↵
    1. Tewari P,
    2. Gupta D,
    3. Kumar A,
    4. Singh U
    (2005) Opioid sparing during endotracheal intubation using mccoy laryngoscope in neurosurgical patients:the comparison of haemodynamic changes with macintosh blade in a randomized trial. Postgrad Med 51:260–264.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. McCoy EP,
    2. Mirakhur RK,
    3. McCloskey BV
    (1995) A comparison of the stress response to laryngoscopy. The Macintosh versus the McCoy blade. Anaesthesia 50:943–946.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lewis SR,
    2. Butler AR,
    3. Parker J,
    4. Cook TM,
    5. Schofield-Robinson OJ,
    6. Smith AF
    (2017) Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation:a Cochrane Systematic Review. Br J Anaesth 119:369–383.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kaur S,
    2. Gupta A,
    3. Ranjana R
    (2009) Intubating conditions and stress response to laryngoscopy:Comparison between Macintosh and levering (McCoy's Type) laryngoscope. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol 25:333–336.
    OpenUrl
    1. Nishiyama T,
    2. Higashizawa T,
    3. Bito H,
    4. Konishi A,
    5. Sakai T
    (1997) Which laryngoscope is the most stressful in laryngoscopy;Macintosh, Miller, or McCoy? Masui 46:1519–1524.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Abdelgawad AF,
    2. Shi QF,
    3. Halawa MA,
    4. Wu ZL,
    5. Wu ZY,
    6. Chen XD,
    7. et al.
    (2015) Comparison of cardiac output and hemodynamic responses of intubation among different video laryngoscopies in normotensive and hypertensive patients. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 35:432–438.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Buhari F,
    2. Selvaraj V
    (2016) Randomized controlled study comparing the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with McCoy, Macintosh, and C-MAC laryngoscopes in adult patients. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 32:505–509.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Sarkılar G,
    2. Sargın M,
    3. Sarıtaş TB,
    4. Borazan H,
    5. Gök F,
    6. Kılıçaslan A,
    7. et al.
    (2015) Hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation performed with video and direct laryngoscopy in patients scheduled for majör cardiac surgery. Int J ClinExp Med 8:11477–11483.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Kanchi M,
    2. Nair HC,
    3. Banakal S,
    4. Murthy K,
    5. Murugesan C
    (2011) Haemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation in coronary artery disease:Direct versus video laryngoscopy. Indian J Anaesth 55:260–265.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Kihara S,
    2. Brimacombe J,
    3. Yaguchi Y,
    4. Watanabe S,
    5. Taguchi N,
    6. Komatsuzaki T
    (2003) Hemodynamic responses among three tracheal intubation devices in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Anesth Analg 96:890–895.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Shin HJ,
    2. Shin YD,
    3. Kim ST
    (2009) The effect of tracheal intubation with the McCoy or Macintosh laryngoscope on the blood pressure and heart rate during propofol-remifentanil induction. Korean J Anesthesiol 56:387–391.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Aggarwal H,
    2. Kaur S,
    3. Baghla N,
    4. Kaur S
    (2019) Hemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation:Comparison between Macintosh, McCoy, and C-MAC Video Laryngoscope. Anesth Essays Res 13:308–312.
    OpenUrl
    1. Haidry MA,
    2. Khan FA
    (2013) Comparison of hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation with Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 29:196–199.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Aziz MF,
    2. Dillman D,
    3. Fu R,
    4. Brambrink AM
    (2012) Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway. Anesthesiology 116:629–636.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Jephcott A
    (1984) The Macintosh Laryngoscope. Anaesthesia 39:474–479.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. McCoy EP,
    2. Mirakhur RK
    (1993) The levering laryngoscope. Anaesthesia 48:516–519.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Cavus E,
    2. Kieckhaefer J,
    3. Doerges V,
    4. Moeller T,
    5. Thee C,
    6. Wagner K
    (2010) The C-MAC video laryngoscope:first experiences with a new device for video laryngoscopy-guided intubation. Anesth Analg 110:473–477.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Piepho T,
    2. Fortmueller K,
    3. Heid FM,
    4. Schmidtmann I,
    5. Werner C,
    6. Noppens RR
    (2011) Performance of the C-MAC video laryngoscope in patients after a limited glottic view using Macintosh laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 66:1101–1105.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Cavus E,
    2. Thee C,
    3. Moeller T,
    4. Kieckhaefer J,
    5. Doerges V,
    6. Wagner K
    (2011) A randomised, controlled crossover comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy in 150 patients during routine induction of anaesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol 11:6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Butterworth IV JF,
    2. Mackey DC,
    3. Wasnick JD
    (2013) Morgan &Mikhail's Clinical Anesthesiology, Airway Management (McGraw Hill, New York), 5th edn, pp 575–592.
  25. ↵
    1. Guillaume J,
    2. Janny P
    (1951) Continuous intracranial manometry;physiopathologic and clinical significance of the method. Presse Med 59:953–955.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Dubourg J,
    2. Javouhey E,
    3. Geeraerts T,
    4. Messerer M,
    5. Kassai B
    (2011) Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter for detection of raised intracranial pressure:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 37:1059–1068.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Maissan IM,
    2. Dirven PJ,
    3. Haitsma IK,
    4. Hoeks SE,
    5. Gommers D,
    6. Stolker RJ
    (2015) Ultrasonographic measured optic nerve sheath diameter as an accurate and quick monitor for changes in intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 123:743–747.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Hansen HC,
    2. Helmke K
    (1996) The subarachnoid space surrounding the optic nerves:an ultrasound study of the optic nerve sheath. Surg Radiol Anat 18:323–328.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Khan MN,
    2. Shallwani H,
    3. Khan MU,
    4. Shamim MS
    (2017) Noninvasive monitoring intracranial pressure. A review of available modalities. Surg Neurol Int 8:51.
    OpenUrl
    1. Shah SB,
    2. Bhargava AK,
    3. Choudhury I
    (2015) Noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring via optic nerve sheath diameter for robotic surgery in steep trendelenburg position. Saudi J Anaesth 9:239–246.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kim EJ,
    2. Koo BN,
    3. Choi SH,
    4. Park K,
    5. Kim MS
    (2018) Ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter for predicting elevated intracranial pressure during laparoscopic surgery:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32:175–182.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kim MS,
    2. Bai SJ,
    3. Lee JR,
    4. Choi YD,
    5. Kim YJ,
    6. Choi SH
    (2014) Increase in intracranial pressure during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum with steep trendelenburg positioning proven by ultrasonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter. J Endourol 28:801–806.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Whiteley JR,
    2. Taylor J,
    3. Henry M,
    4. Epperson TI,
    5. Hand WR
    (2015) Detection of elevated intracranial pressure in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 27:155–159.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Yu J,
    2. Hong JH,
    3. Park JY,
    4. Hwang JH,
    5. Cho SS,
    6. Kim YK
    (2018) Propofol attenuates the increase of sonographic optic nerve sheath diameter during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy:a randomized clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiology 18:72.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Patterson DF,
    2. Ho ML,
    3. Leavitt JA,
    4. Smischney NJ,
    5. Hocker SE,
    6. Wijdicks EF,
    7. et al.
    (2018) Comparison of ocular ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for detection of increased intracranial pressure. Front Neurol 9:278.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Rajajee V,
    2. Vanaman M,
    3. Fletcher JJ,
    4. Jacobs TL
    (2011) Optic nerve ultrasound for the detection of raised intracranial pressure. Neurocritical Care 15:506–515.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Ballantyne SA,
    2. O'Neill G,
    3. Hamilton R,
    4. Hollman AS
    (2002) Observer variation in the sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter in normal adults. Eur J Ultrasound 15:145–149.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Citation Tools
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

Keywords