Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1
- Year-wise mean avoidant and approach coping scores. COPE: coping orientation to problems experienced, SD: standard deviation
- Figure 2
- Year-wise mean emotional response scores. SD: standard deviation
Tables
Variables n (%) Gender Female 141 (54.0) Male 120 (46.0) Year of study First year 60 (23.0) Second year 39 (14.9) Third year 41 (15.7) Fourth year 65 (24.9) Fifth year 56 (21.5) Overall scores, mean±SD Avoidant coping 20.65±1.80 Approach coping 19.62±1.58 Anxiety 3.45±1.00 Fear 2.46±1.07 Anger 3.14±1.37 Sadness 2.15±1.11 SD: standard deviation
- Table 2
- Comparison of coping strategies and emotional response scores for gender and phase of study (N=261).
Response Gender Phase of study Male Female P-value Preclinical† Clinical‡ P-value mean±SD mean±SD Avoidant coping 20.38±2.03 20.88±1.56 0.030* 21.16±1.59 20.06±1.86 <0.001* Approach coping 19.84±1.44 19.43±1.67 0.035* 19.65±1.47 19.59±1.71 0.748 Anxiety 3.44±1.04 3.46±0.97 0.876 3.29±1.10 3.64±0.84 0.005* Fear 2.34±0.99 2.56±1.12 0.096 2.49±1.08 2.43±1.06 0.674 Anger 3.16±1.10 3.12±1.13 0.786 3.33±1.24 2.92±0.90 0.002* Sadness 2.07±1.36 2.22±1.38 0.37 1.97±1.13 2.36±1.59 0.027* SD: standard deviation, †year 1-3, ‡year 4 and 5, *p-value indicates that there is a significant difference
- Table 3
- Regression analysis of emotional responses during COVID-19 as a function of coping strategies.
Independent variable Dependent variables Anxiety Fear Anger Sadness Beta T P-value Beta T P-value Beta T P-value Beta T P-value Avoidant coping 0.1 1.1 0.3 0.1 1.5 0.2 0.2 3 0.003* 0.2 2.9 0.005* Approach coping -0.1 -1.1 0.3 -0.1 -1.6 0.1 0 -0.4 0.717 -0.1 -1.4 0.178 *p-value indicates that there is a significant difference
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.