Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Prevalence of preterm birth and risk factors associated with it at different gestational ages

A multicenter retrospective survey in China

Yi-Jie Zhang, Yan Zhu, Li Zhu, Cheng-Qiu Lu, Chao Chen and Lin Yuan
Saudi Medical Journal June 2022, 43 (6) 599-609; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2022.43.6.20220210
Yi-Jie Zhang
From the Department of Neonatology (Zhang, Zhu Y, Zhu L, Chen, Yuan), Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, from the Division of Neonatology (Lu), Gynecology and Obstetrics Hospital of Fudan University; and from the Key Laboratory of Neonatal Diseases (Chen), National Health Commission, Shanghai, China.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yan Zhu
From the Department of Neonatology (Zhang, Zhu Y, Zhu L, Chen, Yuan), Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, from the Division of Neonatology (Lu), Gynecology and Obstetrics Hospital of Fudan University; and from the Key Laboratory of Neonatal Diseases (Chen), National Health Commission, Shanghai, China.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li Zhu
From the Department of Neonatology (Zhang, Zhu Y, Zhu L, Chen, Yuan), Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, from the Division of Neonatology (Lu), Gynecology and Obstetrics Hospital of Fudan University; and from the Key Laboratory of Neonatal Diseases (Chen), National Health Commission, Shanghai, China.
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cheng-Qiu Lu
From the Department of Neonatology (Zhang, Zhu Y, Zhu L, Chen, Yuan), Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, from the Division of Neonatology (Lu), Gynecology and Obstetrics Hospital of Fudan University; and from the Key Laboratory of Neonatal Diseases (Chen), National Health Commission, Shanghai, China.
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chao Chen
From the Department of Neonatology (Zhang, Zhu Y, Zhu L, Chen, Yuan), Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, from the Division of Neonatology (Lu), Gynecology and Obstetrics Hospital of Fudan University; and from the Key Laboratory of Neonatal Diseases (Chen), National Health Commission, Shanghai, China.
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lin Yuan
From the Department of Neonatology (Zhang, Zhu Y, Zhu L, Chen, Yuan), Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, from the Division of Neonatology (Lu), Gynecology and Obstetrics Hospital of Fudan University; and from the Key Laboratory of Neonatal Diseases (Chen), National Health Commission, Shanghai, China.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    - Flowchart showing the recruitment process for participants.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1 -

    General characteristics of the study group.

    CharacteristicsTotal group (n=215254)Preterm group (n=15833)Term group (n=199421)P-value
    Gestational age (weeks)*38±234±239±1<0.001
    Birth weight (g)*3262±5002419±5833329±4263<0.001
    Male †114084 (53.0)9212 (58.0)105094 (52.7)0.001
    Maternal age (years) †27.4±4.927.7±5.627.4±4.8<0.001
    Parity †#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;<0.001
    1149951 (69.7)9949 (62.8)140002 (70.2)#x00A0;
    ≥265303 (30.3)5884 (37.2)59419 (29.8)#x00A0;
    Apgar score at 5 min of <7600 (2.8)335 (2.1)265 (1.3)<0.001
    • ↵* Mean±SD, p<0.05 was considered significant.

    • ↵† n (%), p<0.05 was considered significant.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    - Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for singleton preterm births.

    FactorsSingleton preterm(n=15833)Singleton term(n=199421)OR (95% CI)*P-valueaOR (95% CI) (Model A)†P-value
    Maternal age (years)#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    <20609 (3.8)4584 (2.3)1.796 (1.647–1.958)<0.0011.963 (1.796–2.145)<0.001
    20–3413124 (82.9)177395 (89.0)1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    ≥352100 (13.3)17442 (8.7)1.627 (1.550–1.708)<0.0011.318 (1.250–1.390)<0.001
    Parity#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    19949 (62.8)140002 (70.2)1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    ≥25884 (37.2)59419 (29.8)1.393 (1.347–1.441)<0.0011.423 (1.372–1.476)<0.001
    HDP#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes1007 (6.4)3486 (1.7)3.818 (3.552–4.103)<0.0013.978 (3.691–4.288)<0.001
    No14826 (93.6)195935 (98.3)1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    GDM#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes723 (4.6)7020 (3.5)1.311 (1.213–1.418)<0.0011.216 (1.122–1.319)<0.001
    No15110 (95.4)192401 (96.5)1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    ICP#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes347 (2.2)973 (0.5)4.570 (4.039–5.172)<0.0015.520 (4.860–6.270)<0.001
    No15486 (97.8)198448 (99.5)1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    Anemia#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes288 (1.8)2407 (1.2)1.516 (1.341–1.71)<0.0011.261 (1.108–1.436)<0.001
    No15545 (98.2)199421 (98.2)1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    Chorioamnionitis#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes196 (1.2)787 (0.4)3.164 (2.703–3.703)<0.0012.834 (2.406–3.340)<0.001
    No15637 (98.8)198634 (99.6)1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    Placenta previa#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes284 (1.8)392 (0.2)9.27 (7.95–10.81)<0.00110.09 (8.60–11.83)<0.001
    No15549 (98.2)199029 (99.8)1.00#x00A0;1.00#x00A0;
    Placental abruption#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes96 (0.6)66 (0.0)18.42 (13.46–25.21)<0.00117.20 (12.35–23.95)<0.001
    No15737 (99.4)199355 (100.0)1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    Fetal distress#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes832 (5.3)8018 (4.0)1.324 (1.230–1.425)<0.0011.249 (1.157–1.348)<0.001
    No15001 (94.7)191403 (96.0)1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;

    Values are presented as number and percentages (%).

    • ↵* OR (odds ratio) value and 95% CI (confidence interval) of univariate logistic analysis model, p<0.05 was considered significant. †aOR (adjusted odds ratio) value and 95% CI after adjusting for other confounders in Model A (including maternal age, parity, HDP, GDM, ICP, anemia, chorioamnionitis, placenta previa, placental abruption, and fetal distress); p<0.05 was considered significant. HDP: hypertension disorders in pregnancy, ICP: intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus

    • View popup
    Table 3 -

    Risk factors associated with each preterm subgroup compared to the term group in multinomial multivariate logistic regression analysis.

    #x00A0;<32 weeks#x00A0;32–33 weeks#x00A0;34–36 weeks#x00A0;
    FactorsaOR (95% CI)*P-valueaOR (95% CI)*P-valueaOR (95% CI)*P-value
    Maternal age (years)#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    <202.084 (1.650–2.632)<0.0012.197 (1.810–2.666)<0.0011.437 (1.289–1.601)<0.001
    20–341.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    ≥351.396 (1.213–1.606)<0.0011.167 (1.024–1.330)0.0201.204 (1.132–1.280)<0.001
    Parity#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    11.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    ≥21.369 (1.238–1.514)<0.0011.332 (1.220–1.455)<0.0011.218 (1.169–1.269)<0.001
    HDP#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes3.564 (2.930–4.335)<0.0014.418 (3.774–5.173)<0.0013.044 (2.786–3.326)<0.001
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    GDM#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes1.113 (0.886–1.399)0.3581.092 (0.893–1.336)0.3921.156 (1.054–1.267)<0.001
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    ICP#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes1.384 (0.766–2.499)0.2823.056 (2.147–4.348)<0.0015.763 (5.049–6.577)<0.001
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    Anemia#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes1.240 (0.896–1.715)0.1951.582 (1.207–2.074)0.0011.096 (0.939–1.279)0.246
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    Chorioamnionitis#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes11.06 (8.738–14.02)<0.0013.023 (2.119–4.314)<0.0012.247 (2.153–2.344)<0.001
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    Placenta previa#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes40.04 (32.00–50.09)<0.00113.85 (10.28–18.65)<0.0019.37 (7.77–11.29)<0.001
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.00#x00A0;
    Placental abruption#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes41.52 (25.89–66.58)<0.00132.06 (20.27–50.70)<0.00111.67 (7.99–17.02)<0.001
    No1.000#x00A0;1.00#x00A0;1.00#x00A0;
    Fetal distress#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes1.487 (1.230–1.799)<0.0011.477 (1.250–1.746)<0.0011.061 (0.969–1.161)0.201
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    • ↵* aOR (adjusted odds ration) value and 95% CI (confidence interval) after adjusting for other confounders in Model B (including maternal age, parity, HDP, GDM, ICP, anemia, chorioamnionitis, placenta previa, placental abruption, and fetal distress). The reference group was the term group. P<0.05 was considered significant. Bold values are significant. Bold numbers are significant. HDP: hypertension disorders in pregnancy, ICP: intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus

    • View popup
    Table 4 -

    Risk factors associated with each spontaneous preterm subgroup compared to the term group in multinomial multivariate logistic regression analysis.

    #x00A0;<32 weeks#x00A0;32–33 weeks#x00A0;34–36 weeks#x00A0;
    FactorsaOR (95% CI)*P-valueaOR (95% CI)*P-valueaOR (95% CI)*P-value
    Maternal age (years)#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    <201.088 (0.757–1.564)0.6491.328 (1.004–1.756)0.0470.950 (0/868–1.163)0.950
    20–341.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    ≥351.585 (1.357–1.851)<0.0011.299 (1.127–1.498)<0.0011.252 (1.166–1.343)<0.001
    Parity#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    11.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    ≥21.391 (1.237–1.563)<0.0011.391 (1.258–1.453)<0.0011.218 (1.161–1.278)<0.001
    HDP#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes8.518 (7.099–10.221)<0.0017.924 (6.797–1.538)<0.0014.303(3.917–4.727)<0.001
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    GDM#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes1.185 (0.922–1.523)0.1841.293 (1.047–1.596)0.0171.286 (1.162–1.424)<0.001
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    ICP#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes1.384 (0.766–2.499)0.2823.875 (2.595–5.786)<0.00110.04(8.79–11.47)<0.001
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    Anemia#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes1.240 (0.896–1.715)0.1951.862 (1.392–2.489)0.0011.221 (1.027–1.452)0.240
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    Chorioamnionitis#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes33.30 (27.29–40.63)<0.0013.863 (2.620–5.694)<0.0011.835 (1.405–2.397)<0.001
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    Placenta previa#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes36.75 (26.02–51.92)<0.00122.71 (16.36–31.517)<0.00116.05 (13.29–19.36)<0.001
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.00#x00A0;
    Placental abruption#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes63.75 (37.49–108.4)<0.00149.59 (30.66–80.21)<0.00117.31 (11.76–25.48)<0.001
    No1.000#x00A0;1.00#x00A0;1.00#x00A0;
    Fetal distress#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes1.735 (1.414–2.130)<0.0011.654 (1.378–1.986)<0.0011.016 (1.050–1.286)0.004
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    • ↵* aOR (adjusted odds ration) value and 95% CI (confidence interval) after adjusting for other confounders in Model B (including maternal age, parity, HDP, GDM, ICP, anemia, chorioamnionitis, placenta previa, placental abruption, and fetal distress); the reference group was the term group. P<0.05 was considered significant. Bold values are significant. HDP: hypertension disorders in pregnancy, ICP: intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus

    • View popup
    Table 5

    - Risk factors associated with each iatrogenic preterm subgroup compared to the term group in multinomial multivariate logistic regression analysis.

    #x00A0;<32 weeks#x00A0;32–33 weeks#x00A0;34–36 weeks#x00A0;
    FactorsaOR (95% CI)*P-valueaOR (95% CI)*P-valueaOR (95% CI)*P-value
    Maternal age (years)#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    <202.103 (1.663–2.660)<0.0012.221 (1.826–2.701)<0.0011.449 (1.299–1.615)<0.001
    20–341.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    ≥351.390 (1.207–1.600)<0.0011.161 (1.018–1.324)0.0271.198 (1.126–1.274)0.001
    Parity#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    11.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    ≥21.331 (1.238–1.514)<0.0011.287 (1.177–1.406)<0.0011.181(1.133–1.231)<0.001
    HDP#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes3.405 (2.799–4.143)<0.0014.176 (3.566–4.892)<0.0012.900 (2.655–3.168)<0.001
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    GDM#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes1.119 (0.889–1.408)0.3391.098 (0.896–1.347)0.3681.162 (1.059–1.274)0.001
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    ICP#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes1.280 (0.709–2.312)0.4132.775 (1.949–3.950)<0.0015.299 (4.646–6.044)<0.001
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    Anemia#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes1.235 (0.891–1.711)0.2041.575 (1.199–2.070)0.0011.092 (0.935–1.275)0.269
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    Chorioamnionitis#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes11.89 (9.391–15.07)<0.0013.317 (2.319–4.743)<0.0012.025 (1.630–2.516)<0.001
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    Placenta previa#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes3.786 (1.682–8.523)0.0011.228 (0.305–4.940)0.7732.276 (1.398–3.706)0.001
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.00#x00A0;
    Placental abruption#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes23.68 (10.21–654.9)<0.00111.236 (23.52–35.87)<0.0012.404(0.755–7.654)0.138
    No1.000#x00A0;1.00#x00A0;1.00#x00A0;
    Fetal distress#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;
    Yes1.487 (1.230–1.799)<0.0011.479 (1.263–1.779)<0.0011.071 (0.978–1.173)0.141
    No1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;1.000#x00A0;
    • ↵* aOR (adjusted odds ration) value and 95% CI (confidence interval) after adjusting for other confounders in Model B (including maternal age, parity, HDP, GDM, ICP, anemia, chorioamnionitis, placenta previa, placental abruption, and fetal distress); the reference group was the term group. P<0.05 was considered significant. Bold values are significant. HDP: hypertension disorders in pregnancy, ICP: intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus.

    • View popup
    Appendix 1 -

    Distribution of the risk factors in each group.

    Variables<32 weeks(n=1703)32–33 weeks(n=2345)34–36 weeks(n=11785)37–41 weeks(199421)P-value*
    Maternal age (years)#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;#x00A0;<0.001
    <2083 (4.9)123 (5.2)403 (3.4)4584 (2.3)#x00A0;
    20–341345 (79.0)1915 (81.7)9864 (83.7)177395 (89.0)#x00A0;
    ≥35275 (16.1)307 (13.1)1518 (12.9)17442 (8.7)#x00A0;
    Parity ≥ 2704 (41.3)905 (38.6)4275 (36.3)59419 (29.8)<0.001
    HDP119 (7.0)182 (7.8)706 (6.0)3486 (1.7)<0.001
    GDM76 (4.5)100 (4.3)547 (4.6)7020 (3.5)<0.001
    ICP12 (0.7)38 (1.6)297 (2.5)1973 (0.5)<0.001
    Anemia37 (2.2)61 (2.6)190 (1.6)2407 (1.2)<0.001
    Chorioamnionitis48 (2.8)35 (1.5)113 (1.0)787 (0.4)<0.001
    Placenta previa47 (2.8)46 (2.0)191 (1.6)6392 (0.2)<0.001
    Placental abruption24 (1.4)26 (1.1)46 (0.4)66 (0.0)<0.001
    Fetal distress124 (7.3)166 (7.1)542 (4.6)80718 (4.0)<0.001

    Values are presented as number and percentages (%).

    • ↵* P-value indicates results of χ2 test comparing proportions of the distribution of risk factors for preterm subgroups. HDP: hypertension disorders in pregnancy, ICP: intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 43 (6)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 43, Issue 6
1 Jun 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prevalence of preterm birth and risk factors associated with it at different gestational ages
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Prevalence of preterm birth and risk factors associated with it at different gestational ages
Yi-Jie Zhang, Yan Zhu, Li Zhu, Cheng-Qiu Lu, Chao Chen, Lin Yuan
Saudi Medical Journal Jun 2022, 43 (6) 599-609; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.6.20220210

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prevalence of preterm birth and risk factors associated with it at different gestational ages
Yi-Jie Zhang, Yan Zhu, Li Zhu, Cheng-Qiu Lu, Chao Chen, Lin Yuan
Saudi Medical Journal Jun 2022, 43 (6) 599-609; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.6.20220210
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Exploring hypothyroidism’s effects on lipid profiles
  • Assessment of asthma control levels in a tertiary hospital
  • The risk factors for cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Saudi Arabia
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • preterm birth
  • risk factors
  • pregnancy
  • prenatal care

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire