Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Brief ReportBrief Communication
Open Access

Changes in cancer screening process in primary care during the covid-19 pandemic. A record-based descriptive study

Yıldız Büyükdereli Atadağ, Ahmet T. Türkmen, Ahmet Öksüz, Hamit S. Keten and Muhammet R. Aydin
Saudi Medical Journal June 2023, 44 (6) 621-624; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2023.44.6.20220580
Yıldız Büyükdereli Atadağ
From the Department of Family Medicine (Atadağ), Abdulkadir Yüksel State Hospital; from the Department of Family Medicine (Keten), Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep; from the Department of Family Medicine (Türkmen), Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya; and from the Department of Family Medicine (Öksüz), Mimar Sinan Family Health Center, Sivas, Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yıldız Büyükdereli Atadağ
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Ahmet T. Türkmen
From the Department of Family Medicine (Atadağ), Abdulkadir Yüksel State Hospital; from the Department of Family Medicine (Keten), Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep; from the Department of Family Medicine (Türkmen), Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya; and from the Department of Family Medicine (Öksüz), Mimar Sinan Family Health Center, Sivas, Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ahmet Öksüz
From the Department of Family Medicine (Atadağ), Abdulkadir Yüksel State Hospital; from the Department of Family Medicine (Keten), Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep; from the Department of Family Medicine (Türkmen), Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya; and from the Department of Family Medicine (Öksüz), Mimar Sinan Family Health Center, Sivas, Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hamit S. Keten
From the Department of Family Medicine (Atadağ), Abdulkadir Yüksel State Hospital; from the Department of Family Medicine (Keten), Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep; from the Department of Family Medicine (Türkmen), Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya; and from the Department of Family Medicine (Öksüz), Mimar Sinan Family Health Center, Sivas, Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Muhammet R. Aydin
From the Department of Family Medicine (Atadağ), Abdulkadir Yüksel State Hospital; from the Department of Family Medicine (Keten), Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep; from the Department of Family Medicine (Türkmen), Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya; and from the Department of Family Medicine (Öksüz), Mimar Sinan Family Health Center, Sivas, Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives: To reveal the number of cancer screenings in primary care during the pandemic period and whether there is a change in screening compared to the pre-pandemic period.

Methods: This record-based descriptive study was carried out by evaluating the number of people who applied to family health centers or cancer early diagnosis, screening, and education center (KETEM) units for cancer screening (breast, cervical, and colorectal) for any reason. The study data were scanned between January 2017 and December 2020 and were obtained from the Gaziantep Provincial Health Directorate Cancer Branch.

Results: Breast cancer screening was the highest in December 2019 (n=2971), cervical cancer screening was the highest in October 2019 (n=4693), and colon cancer screening was the highest in September 2019 (n=2464). Breast cancer screening was the lowest in August 2020 (n=0), cervical cancer screening was the lowest in May 2020 (n=6), and colon cancer screening was the lowest in February and March 2018. Although the target populations and percentages in breast cancer, cervical cancer and colon cancer screenings increased with the following years, the screening populations and percentages decreased in 2020 compared to other years (percentages, 4.4%, 6.2%, 1.9%).

Conclusion: For cancers that can be prevented by early diagnosis, it is of great importance to increase cancer screenings, which have decreased with the pandemic, to the required level.

Keywords:
  • pandemic
  • cancer screenings
  • primary care
  • Covid-19

Breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings are performed in primary care. Cervical cancer screenings include the papanicolaou test (Pap smear test) and human papillomavirus (HPV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) testing. Breast cancer screenings are performed with a mammography and breast examination, while colorectal cancer screenings are performed with fecal occult blood (FOB) tests and a colonoscopy.1

Women should start getting Pap smear tests from ages 30-65 (including the ages of 30 and 65), with an HPV or Pap smear test every 5 years in Turkey.2 The breast cancer screening program in Turkey invites women aged 40-69 to undergo digital/conventional mammography every 2 years. A breast examination is also recommended for every woman screened to increase effectiveness. Women older than 20 should be advised to perform breast self-exams.3 For colorectal cancer screening, everyone between ages 50 and 70 should have an FOB test every 2 years and a colonoscopy every 10 years. Screening is recommended after age 40 for those with a first-degree relative and a history of colorectal cancer or adenomatous polyps.4

During the pandemic, the Ministry of Health directed patients primarily to family health centers (FHCs) to reduce the potential crowding of secondary and tertiary healthcare providers. With this practice, a plan and program were made on how to conduct such services in primary care, aiming to reduce the density that may occur in FHC and the associated risk of disease transmission.5 These plans recommended that cancer screenings be temporarily postponed.

This study aimed to reveal the extent to which routine cancer screenings in primary care could be performed during the pandemic and whether there has been a change compared to the pre-pandemic period.

Methods

This record-based descriptive study was carried out by evaluating the number of people who applied to family health centers or cancer early diagnosis, screening, and education center (KETEM) units for cancer screening (breast, cervical, and colorectal) for any reason. The cancer screening tests currently performed in our country for breast cancer: i) mammography is performed between the ages of 40-69, ii) cervical cancer with Pap-smear and HPV analysis between the ages of 30-65, and iii) colorectal cancer screening with stool occult blood test between the ages of 50-70 years. The data of these screening tests are recorded in the family medicine information systems used in the family medicine offices where they are performed, and in the information management systems used in the KETEM units. All data in the province are recorded in the information management systems of the relevant provincial health directorates. The study data were scanned between January 2017 and December 2020 and were obtained from the Gaziantep Provincial Health Directorate Cancer Branch. Screening data consisted of the number of people who were tested on a monthly and annual basis for each cancer screening, as well as screening percentages.

People whose results were not clearly stated in the screening tests, who were described as insufficient samples, and who were recommended to repeat the test or screening were not included in the study. The numbers of people whose results were clearly stated were included in the study.

Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine Clinical Research Ethics Committee approval was obtained for this study. With registration No. 2021-36. Necessary permission was obtained from the Gaziantep Provincial Health Directorate. The study was deemed appropriate by the Ministry of Health. The study was carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 20, (IBMCorp, Armonk, NY, USA). Median and minimum–maximum values were used for analyses. Data were presented with frequency distribution (number, percentage) for categorical variables.

Results

This study evaluated 139,608 individuals. Breast cancer, cervical cancer, and colon cancer screening numbers and rates were highest in 2019. Breast cancer, cervical cancer, and colon cancer screening numbers and rates were the lowest in 2020. Breast cancer screening was the highest in December 2019 (n=2,971), cervical cancer screening was the highest in October 2019 (n=4,693), and colon cancer screening was the highest in September 2019 (n=2,464). Breast cancer screening was lowest in August 2020 (n=0), cervical cancer screening was lowest in May 2020 (n=6), and colon cancer screening was lowest in February and March 2018 (n=0; Table 1 & 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

- Cancer screening target populations and realization rates by year.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

- Number of screenings per month.

Although the target populations and percentages in breast cancer, cervical cancer, and colon cancer screenings increased with the following years, the screening populations and percentages decreased in 2020 compared to other years (percentages: 4.36%, 6.16%, 1.92%) (Table 1). Screening tests for breast, cervical and colon cancers continued at a moderate amount until March 2020, but declined drastically by April 2020. This decrease also led to a decrease on a yearly basis. In March 2020, cancer screening numbers were 1072 (breast), 588 (cervix), 1107 (colon). These numbers decreased to 12 (breast), 12 (cervix), 23 (colon) in April 2020 (Table 2).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

- Number of cancer screening by year.

Discussion

This study evaluated the screening rates among the target populations to be reached by KETEM and family health centers in the province of Gaziantep between January 2017 and December 2020 for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screenings included in the national cancer screening program of the Ministry of Health and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on these rates.

Cancer screening tests aim to detect cancer before symptoms appear in individuals. Cancers are among the leading causes of death in the world, as well as in Turkey. Cancer screening is believed to provide an early diagnosis, an early treatment, and a cure. In addition, it aims to prevent the shortening of the patient’s life expectancy and deterioration of the quality of life. Similar to all early-diagnosed diseases, early diagnosis is cost-effective in cancers, as the cost of treatment and care for a cancer case caught at an advanced stage is high.6

Colorectal cancer symptoms usually appear in advanced stages. Colorectal cancer is a common diagnosable disease in which treatment success increases with early diagnosis. It is one of the most suitable diseases for screening. In addition to protection from colorectal cancer, screening, early diagnosis, and treatment are the most effective ways to reduce mortality. Although there are various screening tests, early diagnosis is very limited due to low compliance. In California, United States of America (USA) there was 48% participation in colorectal cancer screening.7 In our study, colorectal cancer screenings were observed to be quite low in our country. However, it is also evident that there was a relatively increasing trend until the pre-pandemic period. It was found that this increasing trend was interrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, the screenings decreased approximately fivefold in the first year of the pandemic compared to the previous year. This indicates that cases will appear later at higher-level cancer stages.

In addition, mammography screening is an important method that reduces mortality rates by identifying high-risk groups for malignancy in breast cancer.8 Studies evaluating the willingness of individuals to participate in breast cancer screening have found that, in most countries, the willingness to participate in mammography screenings is quite high, with participation rates above 70%.8,9 Our study found that screening rates in the target population for breast cancer screening for the years 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020 to be 26%, 21.5%, 33.2%, and 6.2%. Screening rates indicate that the participation is low, and screening values have dropped dramatically during the pandemic. This situation can also be interpreted as an indication that cases of advanced breast cancer will increase in the future.

The Pap smear test is an easy-to-apply, low-cost, harmless, high-sensitivity test that also reduces treatment burden, mortality, and morbidity.10 In the USA, the ratio of women having pap smear and HPV–DNA testing was reported as 83%.11 Since there is no organized screening program in Europe, participation rates ranging from 17% to 79% have been reported in five studies.12 In our study, the rates in the target population for cervical cancer screening for the years 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020 were 26%, 22%, 33.2%, and 6.2%. Compared to cancer screenings in developed countries, the screening rates in our study were low. We believe that more attention should be paid to screening in the post-pandemic period due to severe declines in screening rates during the pandemic. Postponing cancer screenings during the pandemic would increase the incidence of advanced cancer and the treatment costs of these cases.13

Study limitations

This study is a retrospective review, and the reasons for the increases and decreases in the remaining periods before the pandemic period could not be examined in detail. The fact that the study did not cover the late continuation of the pandemic makes it difficult to predict the possibility of delayed cancer diagnoses.

In conclusion, action plans for screening should be made to increase participation in screening and not to interrupt health services in extraordinary situations such as pandemics. New projects are needed to reach the patient groups that were not screened during the pandemic, establish additional screening units to catch up with the rates in the pre-pandemic years, and then increase the rates to reach the levels recorded in developed countries.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Scribendi Inc (www.scribendi.com) for the English language editing.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure. Authors have no conflict of interests, and the work was not supported or funded by any drug company.

  • Received December 30, 2022.
  • Accepted April 11, 2023.
  • Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal

This is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Tekpınar H ,
    2. Aşık Z ,
    3. Özen M.
    Evaluation of the patients who apply to family medicine policlinic. Turk Aile Hek Derg 2018; 22: 28–36.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    Ministry Of Health Of The Republic Of Turkey. Cervical Cancer Screening Program National Standards. [Updated 2017; cited 2021 Jan 4]. Available from: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/tr/kanser-tarama-standartlari/listesi/serviks-kanseri-tarama-program%C4%B1-ulusal-standartlar%C4%B1.html
  3. 3.↵
    Ministry of Health of The Republic of Turkey. Breast Cancer Screening Program National Standards. [Updated 2017; cited 2021 Jan 5]. Available from: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/tr/kanser-tarama-standartlari/listesi/meme-kanseri-tarama-program%C4%B1-ulusal-standartlar%C4%B1.html
  4. 4.↵
    Colorectal Cancer Screening Program National Standards. Ministry Of Health Of The Republic Of Turkey. [Updated 2017; cited 2021 Jan 5]. Available from: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/tr/kanser-tarama-standartlari/listesi/kolorektal-kanser-tarama-program%C4%B1-ulusal-standartlar%C4%B1.html
  5. 5.↵
    1. Samanci VM.
    Pandemic process in primary healthcare. Konuralp Tıp Derg 2020; 12: 391–393.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ersoy E ,
    2. Saatçi E.
    Cancer screening: Controversies. Türk Aile Hek Derg 2017; 21: 118–122.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Issa I ,
    2. Noureddine M.
    Colorectal cancer screening: An updated review of the available options. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23: 5086–5096.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Milosevic M ,
    2. Jankovic D ,
    3. Milenkovic A ,
    4. Stojanov D.
    Early diagnosis and detection of breast cancer.Technol Health Care 2018; 26: 729–759.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Seely JM ,
    2. Alhassan T.
    Screening for breast cancer in 2018-what should we be doing today? Curr Oncol 2018; 25: 115–124.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Sachan PL ,
    2. Singh M ,
    3. Patel ML ,
    4. Sachan R.
    A study on cervical cancer screening using pap smear test and clinical correlation. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2018; 5: 337–341.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. White A ,
    2. Thompson TD ,
    3. White MC ,
    4. Sabatino SA ,
    5. de Moor J ,
    6. Doria-Rose PV , et al.
    Cancer screening test use - United States. MMWR 2017; 66: 201–206.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Jansen EEL ,
    2. Zielonke N ,
    3. Gini A ,
    4. Anttila A ,
    5. Segnan N ,
    6. Voko Z , et al.
    Effect of organised cervical cancer screening on cervical cancer mortality in Europe: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2020; 127: 207–223.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Karabay O ,
    2. Dheir H ,
    3. Yaylacı S
    1. Etçioğlu E ,
    2. Aydın A.
    Family medicine and Covid-19. In: Karabay O , Dheir H , Yaylacı S , editors. A to Z Covid-19. Ankara: Akademisyen Press; 2021. p. 419–426.
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 44 (6)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 44, Issue 6
1 Jun 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Changes in cancer screening process in primary care during the covid-19 pandemic. A record-based descriptive study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Changes in cancer screening process in primary care during the covid-19 pandemic. A record-based descriptive study
Yıldız Büyükdereli Atadağ, Ahmet T. Türkmen, Ahmet Öksüz, Hamit S. Keten, Muhammet R. Aydin
Saudi Medical Journal Jun 2023, 44 (6) 621-624; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2023.44.6.20220580

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Changes in cancer screening process in primary care during the covid-19 pandemic. A record-based descriptive study
Yıldız Büyükdereli Atadağ, Ahmet T. Türkmen, Ahmet Öksüz, Hamit S. Keten, Muhammet R. Aydin
Saudi Medical Journal Jun 2023, 44 (6) 621-624; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2023.44.6.20220580
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Successful management of human parainfluenza virus-3 outbreak in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit
  • Experience of pediatric liver disease at a university hospital in Western Saudi Arabia
  • Risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules Bethesda III sub classification into nuclear atypia and architectural atypia. A retrospective study
Show more Brief Communication

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • pandemic
  • cancer screenings
  • primary care
  • COVID-19

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire