Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Comparison of the post-operative outcomes between different surgical techniques for inferior turbinate reduction surgery

A cross sectional study

Sultan A. Al Sumairi, Shmokh Al Salamah, Mohammed Asiri, Mohammed J. Al Mahdi, Abdulrahman Al Fayez and Riyadh Al Hedaithy
Saudi Medical Journal June 2024, 45 (6) 578-584; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2024.45.6.20230977
Sultan A. Al Sumairi
From the College of Medicine (Al Sumairi, Al Salamah, Al Mahdi, Al Hedaithy), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, and from the Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Asiri, Al Mahdi, Al Fayez, Al Hedaithy), Department of Surgery, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sultan A. Al Sumairi
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Shmokh Al Salamah
From the College of Medicine (Al Sumairi, Al Salamah, Al Mahdi, Al Hedaithy), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, and from the Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Asiri, Al Mahdi, Al Fayez, Al Hedaithy), Department of Surgery, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohammed Asiri
From the College of Medicine (Al Sumairi, Al Salamah, Al Mahdi, Al Hedaithy), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, and from the Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Asiri, Al Mahdi, Al Fayez, Al Hedaithy), Department of Surgery, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohammed J. Al Mahdi
From the College of Medicine (Al Sumairi, Al Salamah, Al Mahdi, Al Hedaithy), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, and from the Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Asiri, Al Mahdi, Al Fayez, Al Hedaithy), Department of Surgery, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abdulrahman Al Fayez
From the College of Medicine (Al Sumairi, Al Salamah, Al Mahdi, Al Hedaithy), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, and from the Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Asiri, Al Mahdi, Al Fayez, Al Hedaithy), Department of Surgery, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Riyadh Al Hedaithy
From the College of Medicine (Al Sumairi, Al Salamah, Al Mahdi, Al Hedaithy), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, and from the Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Asiri, Al Mahdi, Al Fayez, Al Hedaithy), Department of Surgery, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD, FACS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives: To compare and measure post-operative outcomes among various surgical techniques for reducing inferior turbinate hypertrophy (ITH), and to identify the factors associated with the clinical outcomes of turbinoplasty in patients with this condition.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out from January 2021 to December 2022 at the Otorhinolaryngology Department of King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A total of 301 adult patients with ITH were included and were divided into different groups. Postoperative follow-up assessments were completed after one week, one month, and 6 months to evaluate outcomes and complications associated with each surgical technique; descriptive analysis, cross-tabulation, and exact logistic regression were utilized as data analysis methods.

Results: Most patients in both groups experienced partial or complete improvement after surgery, with 92% showing positive outcomes. Common clinical signs included deviated nasal septum deviation and external nasal deformity, while nasal obstruction was most frequently reported as the primary symptom. Post-surgery bleeding occurred in 3.7% of cases; no adhesions were noted. Microdebrider, medial flap, out-fracture, and submucosal diathermy techniques all demonstrated significantly higher improvement rates than others.

Conclusion: The identified techniques with higher improvement rates offer evidence-based guidance for selecting optimal surgical approaches, while the study’s limitations warrant further prospective research to validate these findings. Ultimately, it contributes valuable knowledge to the field of otorhinolaryngology, aiming to enhance patient outcomes and improve the management of ITH worldwide.

Keywords:
  • inferior turbinate surgery
  • cross sectional study
  • surgical techniques

Footnotes

  • Disclosure. Authors have no conflict of interests, and the work was not supported or funded by any drug company.

  • Received February 15, 2024.
  • Accepted May 6, 2024.
  • Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal

This is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 45 (6)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 45, Issue 6
1 Jun 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of the post-operative outcomes between different surgical techniques for inferior turbinate reduction surgery
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of the post-operative outcomes between different surgical techniques for inferior turbinate reduction surgery
Sultan A. Al Sumairi, Shmokh Al Salamah, Mohammed Asiri, Mohammed J. Al Mahdi, Abdulrahman Al Fayez, Riyadh Al Hedaithy
Saudi Medical Journal Jun 2024, 45 (6) 578-584; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.6.20230977

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of the post-operative outcomes between different surgical techniques for inferior turbinate reduction surgery
Sultan A. Al Sumairi, Shmokh Al Salamah, Mohammed Asiri, Mohammed J. Al Mahdi, Abdulrahman Al Fayez, Riyadh Al Hedaithy
Saudi Medical Journal Jun 2024, 45 (6) 578-584; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.6.20230977
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The risk factors for cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Saudi Arabia
  • Prolonged flight exposure and its effects on sinonasal health among aircrew members
  • Identifying individuals at risk of post-stroke depression
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • inferior turbinate surgery
  • cross sectional study
  • surgical techniques

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire