Effect of laparoscopic intracorporeal reinforcing sutures to prevent anastomotic leakage

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Sung H,
   2. Ferlay J,
   3. Siegel RL,
   4. Laversanne M,
   5. Soerjomataram I,
   6. Jemal A,
   7. Bray F

   . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 209-249.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Zhang HQ,
   2. Xu L,
   3. Wang ZL,
   4. Shao Y,
   5. Chen Y,
   6. Lu YF,
   7. Fu Z

   . The effect of reinforcing sutures and trans-anal drainage tube on the outcome of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: propensity score matched analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408: 289.

   OpenUrlPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Benson AB,
   2. Venook AP,
   3. Al-Hawary MM,
   4. Azad N,
   5. Chen YJ,
   6. Ciombor KK,
   7. Cohen S,
   8. Cooper HS,
   9. Deming D,
   10. Garrido-Laguna I,
   11. Grem JL

   . Rectal cancer, version 2.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20: 1139-1167.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Tschann P,
   2. Weigl MP,
   3. Szeverinski P,
   4. Lechner D,
   5. Brock T,
   6. Rauch S,
   7. Rossner J,
   8. Eiter H,
   9. Girotti PN,
   10. Jäger T,
   11. Presl J

   . Are risk factors for anastomotic leakage influencing long-term oncological outcomes after low anterior resection of locally advanced rectal cancer with neoadjuvant therapy? A single-centre cohort study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407: 2945-2957.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Yang Y,
   2. Ding F,
   3. Xu T,
   4. Pan Z,
   5. Zhuang J,
   6. Liu X,
   7. Guan G

   . Double-stapled anastomosis without “dog-ears” reduces the anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Frontiers in Surgery. 2023 Jan 6;9:1003854.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Zhao Y,
   2. Li B,
   3. Sun Y,
   4. Liu Q,
   5. Cao Q,
   6. Li T, et al.

   Risk factors and preventive measures for anastomotic leak in colorectal cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2022; 21: 15330338221118983.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Shimizu H,
   2. Yamaguchi S,
   3. Ishii T,
   4. Kondo H,
   5. Hara K,
   6. Takemoto K,
   7. Ishikawa S,
   8. Okada T,
   9. Suzuki A,
   10. Koyama I

   . Who needs diverting ileostomy following laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients? Analysis of 417 patients in a single institute. Surg Endosc 2020; 34: 839-846.

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. 8.
   1. Zhao S,
   2. Zhang L,
   3. Gao F,
   4. Wu M,
   5. Zheng J,
   6. Bai L, et al.

   Transanal drainage tube use for preventing anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA surgery. 2021; 156: 1151-11528.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Zhang L,
   2. Xie Z,
   3. Gong L,
   4. Lv X

   . Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection with “dog ear” invagination anastomosis for mid and distal rectal cancer a propensity score matched analysis. Front Surg 2023; 9: 1038873.

   OpenUrlPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Ban B,
    2. Shang A,
    3. Shi J

    . Efficacy of staple line reinforcement by barbed suture for preventing anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14: 821.

    OpenUrlPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Zhang T,
    2. Wang G,
    3. Fang G,
    4. Qiu L,
    5. Lu F,
    6. Yin K,
    7. Miao Y

    . Clinical efficacy of anastomotic reinforcement suture in preventing anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408: 322.

    OpenUrlPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Wang S,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Tao S,
    4. Liu Y,
    5. Shi Y,
    6. Guan J,
    7. Liu M

    . Efficacy of reinforcing sutures for prevention of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Cancer Reports 2024; 7: e1941.

    OpenUrl
13. 13.↵
    1. Hashida H,
    2. Mizuno R,
    3. Iwaki K,
    4. Hanabata Y,
    5. Kita R,
    6. Oshima N, et al.

    Intracorporeal reinforcing sutures reduce anastomotic leakage in double-stapling anastomosis for laparoscopic rectal surgery. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2022; 17: 491-497.

    OpenUrlPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Altomare DF,
    2. Delrio P,
    3. Shelgyn Y,
    4. Rybakov E,
    5. Vincenti L,
    6. De Fazio M,
    7. Simone M,
    8. Graziano G,
    9. Picciariello A

    . Transanal reinforcement of low rectal anastomosis versus protective ileostomy after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Preliminary results of a randomized clinical trial. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23: 1814-1823.

    OpenUrlPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Yi Z, **
    2. ao W

    . Effect of reinforcing ‘dog ear area’to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic TME for rectal cancer. J Colorectal & Anal Surg 2018; 24: 545-548.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Wu Y,
    2. Chen H,
    3. Liu D

    . Effect of anastomotic reinforcement and suture on prevention of postoperative anastomoticleakage in laparoscopic radical resection of middle and low rectal cancer and its influence on postoperative recovery. J Gastrointestinal Oncology 2022; 30: 4274-4276.

    OpenUrl
17. 17.
    1. Li ZS,
    2. Wang CP,
    3. Chen RB

    . Analysis of the influence of reinforced anastomosis on anastomotic fistula after laparoscopic anus-preserving operation for middle and low rectal cancer and its factor. J China Modern Medicine 2021; 28: 14-17.

    OpenUrl
18. 18.
    1. He Y,
    2. Zhu Z,
    3. Liu S,
    4. Liu L,
    5. Hu B,
    6. Wan X,
    7. Huang Q

    . Effect of anastomotic reinforcing sutures on the incidence of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2018; 21: 431-436.

    OpenUrlPubMed
19. 19.
    1. Yang XD

    . The application value of barbed suture in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer to strengthen the anastomosis. The system of medical. 2022; 7: 131-134.

    OpenUrl
20. 20.
    1. Congwen J,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Fu Z

    . Effect of anastomotic reinforcemect suture on the incidence of anastomotic fistula after laparoscopic surgery for low and middle rectal cancer. J Xuzhou Med Univ 2022; 42: 110-114.

    OpenUrl
21. 21.
    1. Li Y,
    2. Li S,
    3. Wang M

    . Effect analysis of anastomotic reinforce in laparoscopic radical resection of middle-low rectal cancer.Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery 2023; 28: 821-825.

    OpenUrl
22. 22.
    1. Luo Y,
    2. Yu M,
    3. Chen J,
    4. Qin J,
    5. Qin S,
    6. Huang Y, et al.

    Application value of barbed suture in reinforcing anastomosis during laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery 2020: 1205-1210.
23. 23.
    1. Maeda K,
    2. Nagahara H,
    3. Shibutani M,
    4. Ohtani H,
    5. Sakurai K,
    6. Toyokawa T,
    7. Muguruma K,
    8. Tanaka H,
    9. Amano R,
    10. Kimura K,
    11. Sugano K

    . Efficacy of intracorporeal reinforcing sutures for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 3535-3542.

    OpenUrlPubMed
24. 24.
    1. Jiang TY,
    2. Zang L,
    3. Dong F,
    4. Feng B,
    5. Zong YP,
    6. Sun J,
    7. Liu HS,
    8. Zheng MH,
    9. Ma JJ

    . Effect of different reinforcement methods on anastomotic leakage prevention after laparoscopic double anastomosis. J Surg Oncol 2021; 123: S81-S87.

    OpenUrlPubMed
25. 25.
    1. Lin H,
    2. Yu M,
    3. Ye G,
    4. Qin S,
    5. Fang H, **
    6. g R,
    7. Gong T,
    8. Luo Y,
    9. Zhong M

    . Intracorporeal reinforcement with barbed suture is associated with low anastomotic leakage rates after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a retrospective study. BMC Surg 2022; 22: 335.

    OpenUrlPubMed
26. 26.
    1. Liu T,
    2. Wang H,
    3. Wang H

    . Clinical study of anastomotic reinforcement suture during laparoscopic rectal cancer TME in reducing postoperative anastomotic leakage. J. Yi Yao Wei Sheng 2023: 56-59.
27. 27.↵
    1. Sheng J,
    2. Huang H,
    3. Xu Y

    . Risk of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection of low rectal cancer and the preventive effect of reinforced sutures. J Zhejiang Surg 2024; 29: 129-131.

    OpenUrl
28. 28.↵
    1. Chapman BC,
    2. Edgcomb M,
    3. Gleisner A,
    4. Vogel JD

    . Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010–2015). Surg Endosc2020; 34: 4754-4771.

    OpenUrlPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Yi X,
    2. Liao W,
    3. Feng X,
    4. Li H,
    5. Chen Z,
    6. Wang J, et al.

    An innovative and convenient technique to reduce anastomotic leakage after double stapling anastomosis: laparoscopic demucositized suture the overlap** point of the “dog ear” area. Updates in Surgery 2022; 74: 1645-1656.

    OpenUrlPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Garmpis N,
    2. Dimitroulis D,
    3. Garmpi A,
    4. Diamantis E,
    5. Spartalis E,
    6. Schizas D, et al.

    Enhanced recovery after surgery: is it time to change our strategy regarding laparoscopic colectomy? In Vivo 2019; 33: 669-674.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Zhao B,
    2. Lv W,
    3. Mei D,
    4. Luo R,
    5. Bao S,
    6. Huang B, et al.

    Comparison of short-term surgical outcome between 3D and 2D laparoscopy surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405: 1-2.

    OpenUrlPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Enomoto H,
    2. Ito M,
    3. Sasaki T,
    4. Nishizawa Y,
    5. Tsukada Y,
    6. Ikeda K,
    7. Hasegawa H

    . Anastomosis-related complications after stapled anastomosis with reinforced sutures in transanal total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a retrospective single-center study. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65: 246-253.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Ataya K,
    2. Patel N,
    3. Yang W,
    4. Aljaafreh A,
    5. Melebari SS, Global Obesity Collaborative

    . Safety and Efficacy of Barbed Sutures Compared to Non-barbed Sutures in Bariatric Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obes Surg 2024; 34: 3324-3334.

    OpenUrlPubMed