Systematic ReviewSystematic Review
Open Access

Advancing genetic counselling in Southern Africa

Unveiling opportunities for inclusive healthcare and genomic education for Angola

Maria Chimpolo, Shahida Moosa, Catherine Lynn T. Silao, Nasser Calumbuana, Elka Kay, Hashim Halim-Fikri, Dhavendra Kumar and Bin Alwi Zilfalil
Saudi Medical Journal April 2025, 46 (4) 335-344; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2025.46.4.20240370

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Quinonez SC,
    2. O’Connor BC,
    3. Jacobs MF,
    4. Tekleab AM,
    5. Marye A,
    6. Bekele D, et al.
    The introduction of genetic counseling in Ethiopia: Results of a training workshop and lessons learned. PLoS One 2021;16: e0255278.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Harding B,
    2. Webber C,
    3. Rühland L,
    4. Dalgarno N,
    5. Armour C,
    6. Birtwhistle R, et al.
    Bridging the gap in genetics: a progressive model for primary to specialist care. BMC Med Educ 2019; 19: 195.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Schmitt A.
    Município de Angola: Censo 2014 e estimativa de 2018. Rev Conexão Emancipacionista. Accessed 2024 September 9]. Available from: http://aurelioschmitt.blogspot.com/2018/02/municipios-de-angola-censo-2014-e.html
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kumar D
    1. Greenberg J,
    2. Kromberg J,
    3. Loggenberg K,
    4. Wessels TM
    . Genetic Counselling in South Africa. In: Kumar D, editor. Genomics and Health in the Developing World. Oxford University Press; 2014. (2012; online edn, Oxford Academic, 1 Feb. 2014).
  5. 5.↵
    1. Gurdasani D,
    2. Carstensen T,
    3. Tekola-Ayele F,
    4. Pagani L,
    5. Tachmazidou I,
    6. Hatzikotoulas K, et al.
    The African Genome Variation Project shapes medical genetics in Africa. Nature 2015: 327-332.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ibidunni L,
    2. Nunez KP,
    3. Jonassaint JC,
    4. De Castro L.
    Regional Differences in the Beliefs and practices among adults with sickle cell disease regarding reproductive health and family planning: A sub-analysis. Blood 2019; 134: 2114.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Adigwe OP,
    2. Onoja SO,
    3. Onavbavba G.
    A critical review of sickle cell disease burden and challenges in sub-saharan Africa. J Blood Med 2023; 14:367-376.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Wessels TM,
    2. Koole T.
    “There is a chance for me” – Risk communication in advanced maternal age genetic counseling sessions in South Africa. Eur J Med Genet 2019; 62: 390-396.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Schoeman M,
    2. Apffelstaedt JP,
    3. Baatjes K,
    4. Urban M.
    Implementation of a breast cancer genetic service in South Africa - lessons learned. S Afr Med J 2013; 103: 529-33.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Cragun D,
    2. Lewis C,
    3. Camperlengo L,
    4. Pal T.
    Hereditary Cancer: Example of a Public Health Approach to Ensure Population Health Benefits of Genetic Medicine. Healthcare 2016; 4: 6.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Biesecker BB,
    2. Peters KF,
    3. Resta R.
    Introduction to Genetic Counseling. In: Advanced Genetic Counseling: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford Academic; 2019. Accessed March 16, 2024.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Jongeneel CV,
    2. Kotze MJ,
    3. Bhaw-Luximon A,
    4. Fadlelmola FM,
    5. Fakim YJ,
    6. Hamdi Y, et al.
    A view on genomic medicine activities in Africa: implications for policy. Front Genet 2022; 13: 769919.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Patch C,
    2. Middleton A.
    Genetic counselling in the era of genomic medicine. Br Med Bull 2018; 126: 27-36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Page MJ,
    2. McKenzie JE,
    3. Bossuyt PM,
    4. Boutron I,
    5. Hoffmann TC,
    6. Mulrow CD, et al.
    The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n71.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Elliott JH,
    2. Turner T,
    3. Clavisi O,
    4. Thomas J,
    5. Higgins JPT,
    6. Mavergames C, et al.
    Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap. PLoS Med 2014; 11: e1001603.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Jung A,
    2. Balzer J,
    3. Braun T,
    4. Luedtke K.
    Identification of tools used to assess the external validity of randomized controlled trials in reviews: a systematic review of measurement properties. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22: 100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Darling-Hammond L,
    2. Flook L,
    3. Cook-Harvey C,
    4. Barron B,
    5. Osher D.
    Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Appl Dev Sci 2020; 24:97-140.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Wariri O,
    2. Okomo U,
    3. Kwarshak YK,
    4. Murray KA,
    5. Grundy C,
    6. Kampmann B.
    Timeliness of routine childhood vaccination in low- and middle-income countries, 1978–2021: Protocol for a scoping review to map methodologic gaps and determinants. PLoS One 2021; 16: e0253423.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Wilczewski M,
    2. Alon I.
    Language and communication in international students’ adaptation: a bibliometric and content analysis review. High Educ (Dordr) 2023; 85: 1235-1256.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Desmedt M,
    2. Ulenaers D,
    3. Grosemans J,
    4. Hellings J,
    5. Bergs J.
    Clinical handover and handoff in healthcare: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Int J Qual Health Care. 2021; 33: mzaa170.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Adams RJ,
    2. Smart P,
    3. Huff AS.
    Shades of grey: Guidelines for working with the grey literature in systematic reviews for management and organizational studies. Int J Manag Rev 2017; 19: 432-454.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Koffel JB.
    Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: a cross-sectional survey of recent authors. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0125931.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Kolaski K,
    2. Logan LR,
    3. Ioannidis JPA.
    Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2023; 12: 96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Büchter RB,
    2. Weise A,
    3. Pieper D.
    Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020; 20: 259.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Baine-Savanhu F,
    2. Macaulay S,
    3. Louw N, et al.
    Identifying the genetic causes of developmental disorders and intellectual disability in Africa: a systematic literature review. Front Genet 2023; 14: 1137922.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Bandara W,
    2. Furtmueller E,
    3. Gorbacheva E,
    4. Miskon S,
    5. Beekhuyzen J.
    Achieving rigor in literature reviews: Insights from qualitative data analysis and tool-support. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 2015; 37.
  27. 27.↵
    1. Higgins JPT,
    2. Altman DG,
    3. Gøtzsche PC,
    4. Jüni P,
    5. Moher D,
    6. Oxman AD, et al.
    The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d5928.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Haidich AB.
    Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia 2010; 14: 29-37.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Scott M,
    2. Watermeyer J,
    3. Wessels TM.
    “We are just not sure what that means or if it’s relevant”: Uncertainty when gathering family history information in South African prenatal genetic counseling consultations. Soc Sci Med 2024; 342: 116555.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.
    1. Moore SW,
    2. Zaahl MG.
    A review of genetic mutation in familial Hirschsprung’s disease in South Africa: towards genetic counseling. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43: 325-329.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Jongeneel CV,
    2. Kotze MJ,
    3. Bhaw-Luximon A,
    4. Fadlelmola FM,
    5. Fakim YJ,
    6. Hamdi Y, et al.
    A view on genomic medicine activities in Africa: implications for policy. Front Genet 2022; 13: 769919.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Penn C,
    2. Watermeyer J,
    3. MacDonald C,
    4. Moabelo C.
    Grandmothers as gems of genetic wisdom: exploring South African traditional beliefs about the causes of childhood genetic disorders. J Genet Couns 2010; 19: 9-21.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. 33.
    1. Van Wyk C,
    2. Wessels TM,
    3. Kromberg JG,
    4. Krause A.
    Knowledge regarding basic concepts of hereditary cancers, and the available genetic counselling and testing services: A survey of general practitioners in Johannesburg, South Africa. S Afr Med J 2016; 106: 268-271.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.
    1. Morris M,
    2. Glass M,
    3. Wessels TM,
    4. Kromberg JG.
    Mothers’ experiences of genetic counselling in Johannesburg, South Africa. J Genet Couns 2015; 24: 158-168.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Mafisa L,
    2. Dlova AN,
    3. Moodley V.
    The profile of patients with haemophilia managed at a haemophilia treatment centre in Pretoria, Gauteng. S Afr Fam Pract 2022; 64: e1-e7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    1. Abacan M,
    2. Alsubaie L,
    3. Barlow-Stewart K, et al.
    The global state of the genetic counseling profession. Eur J Hum Genet 2019; 27; 183-197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Kinsley N
    . We Are ‘Woman,’ after all. J Genet Couns 2012; 21: 203-204.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Essajee F,
    2. Urban M,
    3. Smit L, et al.
    Utility of genetic testing in children with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) at a tertiary hospital in South Africa: A prospective study. Seizure 2022; 101: 197-204.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Van Der Merwe N,
    2. Ramesar R,
    3. De Vries J.
    Whole exome sequencing in South Africa: Stakeholder views on return of individual research results and incidental findings. Front Genet 2022; 13: 864822.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Zingela Z,
    2. Sokudela F,
    3. Thungana Y,
    4. van Wyk S.
    Ethical principles, challenges and opportunities when conducting genetic counselling for schizophrenia. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14: 1040026.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Higgins JPT,
    2. Thomas J,
    3. Chandler J,
    4. Cumpston M,
    5. Li T,
    6. Page MJ,
    7. Welch VA
    1. Sterne JAC,
    2. Hernán MA,
    3. McAleenan A,
    4. Reeves BC,
    5. Higgins JPT
    . Chapter 25: Assessing risk of bias in a non-randomized study. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4. Cochrane; 2023.
  42. 42.↵
    1. Haldane V,
    2. Chuah FLH,
    3. Srivastava A,
    4. Singh SR,
    5. Koh GCH,
    6. Seng CK, et al.
    Community participation in health services development, implementation, and evaluation: A systematic review of empowerment, health, community, and process outcomes. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0216112.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Zhong A,
    2. Darren B,
    3. Dimaras H
    . Ethical, social, and cultural issues related to clinical genetic testing and counseling in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev 2017; 6: 140.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. FitzGerald C,
    2. Hurst S.
    Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics 2017; 18: 19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Tindana P,
    2. de Vries J,
    3. Campbell M, et al.
    Community engagement strategies for genomic studies in Africa: a review of the literature. BMC Med Ethics 2015; 16: 1-12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Cohen-Kfir N,
    2. Bentwich ME,
    3. Kent A,
    4. Dickman N,
    5. Tanus M,
    6. Higazi B, et al.
    Challenges to effective and autonomous genetic testing and counseling for ethno-cultural minorities: a qualitative study. BMC Med Ethics 2020; 21: 98.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Appiah S,
    2. Korsah KA,
    3. AmpongAdjei C,
    4. Appiah OE
    . Genetic counseling in sickle cell disease: views of single young adults in Ghana. J Community Genet 2020; 11: 485-493.
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Citation Tools
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

Keywords