Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Systematic ReviewSystematic Review
Open Access

Pocket-creation method versus conventional method of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer

A systematic review and meta-analysis

Min-Min Song, Feng-Bing Wang, Jian-Lin Yang, Hai-Yan Zhang and Tai-Ping Wang
Saudi Medical Journal May 2025, 46 (5) 450-458; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2025.46.5.20250045
Min-Min Song
From the Department of Gastroenterology (Song, Yang, Zhang, T. Wang), The People’s Hospital Of Rizhao, and from the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery (F. Wang), Rizhao Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Rizhao, China.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Min-Min Song
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Feng-Bing Wang
From the Department of Gastroenterology (Song, Yang, Zhang, T. Wang), The People’s Hospital Of Rizhao, and from the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery (F. Wang), Rizhao Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Rizhao, China.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jian-Lin Yang
From the Department of Gastroenterology (Song, Yang, Zhang, T. Wang), The People’s Hospital Of Rizhao, and from the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery (F. Wang), Rizhao Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Rizhao, China.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hai-Yan Zhang
From the Department of Gastroenterology (Song, Yang, Zhang, T. Wang), The People’s Hospital Of Rizhao, and from the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery (F. Wang), Rizhao Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Rizhao, China.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tai-Ping Wang
From the Department of Gastroenterology (Song, Yang, Zhang, T. Wang), The People’s Hospital Of Rizhao, and from the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery (F. Wang), Rizhao Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Rizhao, China.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bray F,
    2. Laversanne M,
    3. Sung H,
    4. Ferlay J,
    5. Siegel RL,
    6. Soerjomataram I, et al.
    Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74: 229-263.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Liu Y,
    2. He S,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Dou L,
    5. Liu X,
    6. Yu X, et al.
    Comparing long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for type II esophagogastric junction neoplasm. Ann Transl Med 2021; 9: 322.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Liu Q,
    2. Ding L,
    3. Qiu X,
    4. Meng F.
    Updated evaluation of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2020; 73: 28-41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Ssossé Q,
    2. Wagner J,
    3. Hopper C.
    Assessing the impact of ESD: methods, challenges, and results. Sustainability 2021; 13: 2854.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lopimpisuth C,
    2. Simons M,
    3. Akshintala VS,
    4. Prasongdee K,
    5. Nanavati J,
    6. Ngamruengphong S.
    Traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection reduces procedure time and risk of serious adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 36: 1775-1788.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Knoop RF,
    2. Amanzada A,
    3. Petzold G,
    4. Ellenrieder V,
    5. Engelhardt M,
    6. Neesse A, et al.
    Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection with an external additional working channel (EMR+ and ESD+) are equivalent to using a double-channel endoscope: a systematic evaluation in a porcine ex vivo model. Surg Endosc 2023; 37: 7749-7758.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hayashi Y,
    2. Sunada K,
    3. Takahashi H,
    4. Shinhata H,
    5. Lefor AT,
    6. Tanaka A, et al.
    Pocket-creation method of endoscopic submucosal dissection to achieve en bloc resection of giant colorectal subpedunculated neoplastic lesions. Endoscopy 2014; 46: E421-E422.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Gong J,
    2. Chen T,
    3. Tan Y,
    4. Liu D.
    Pocket-creation method improves efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a system review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 33: 1241-1246.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Shinozaki S,
    2. Hayashi Y,
    3. Miura Y,
    4. Yano T,
    5. Lefor AK,
    6. Yamamoto H.
    Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket creation method in the Japanese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10: E694-E702.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Pei Q,
    2. Qiao H,
    3. Zhang M,
    4. Wang G,
    5. Feng H,
    6. Pan J, et al.
    Pocket-creation method versus conventional method of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 1038-1046.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kitamura M,
    2. Miura Y,
    3. Shinozaki S,
    4. Yamamoto H.
    The pocket-creation method facilitates gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection and overcomes challenging situations. VideoGIE 2021; 6: 390-394.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Page MJ,
    2. McKenzie JE,
    3. Bossuyt PM,
    4. Boutron I,
    5. Hoffmann TC,
    6. Mulrow CD, et al.
    The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n71.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Higgins JP,
    2. Altman DG,
    3. Gøtzsche PC,
    4. Jüni P,
    5. Moher D,
    6. Oxman AD, et al.
    The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d5928.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wu J,
    2. Li S,
    3. Fan L,
    4. Cheng Y,
    5. Huang J,
    6. Lin M.
    A prospective randomized trial comparing the pocket-creation method and conventional method of endoscopic submucosal dissection in early gastric cancers and precancerous lesions. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28: 1385-1391.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Lin M,
    2. Wu J,
    3. Zhuang S,
    4. Yang H,
    5. Qin X.
    Efficacy and safety of pocket-creation method for early gastric cancers. Surg Endosc 2023; 37: 1581-1592.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.
    1. Lee SP,
    2. Jang HJ,
    3. Kae SH,
    4. Lee JG.
    Outcomes of the conventional versus pocket-creation method for endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric body tumors using a dual knife: a retrospective study. Gut Liver 2023; 17: 547-557.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kitamura M,
    2. Miura Y,
    3. Shinozaki S,
    4. Lefor AK,
    5. Yamamoto H.
    The pocket-creation method facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasms along the lesser curvature at the gastric angle. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9: 825325.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kitamura M,
    2. Miura Y,
    3. Shinozaki S,
    4. Sakamoto H,
    5. Hayashi Y,
    6. Sakaguchi M, et al.
    The pocket-creation method facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasms involving the pyloric ring. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E1062-E1069.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Harada H,
    2. Murakami D,
    3. Suehiro S,
    4. Nakahara R,
    5. Ujihara T,
    6. Sagami R, et al.
    Water-pocket endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastric neoplasms (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 88: 253-260.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Liao C.
    Comparison of standard ESD and the pocket-creation method of ESD in endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer. China Medicine and Pharmacy 2018; 8: 16-19.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Miura Y,
    2. Hayashi Y,
    3. Lefor AK,
    4. Osawa H,
    5. Yamamoto H.
    The pocket-creation method of ESD for gastric neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 457-458.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Weng E,
    2. Dharan M.
    Endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal lesions: preference and feasibility of en bloc resection techniques. JTG 2023; 1: 40-46.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Ham NS,
    2. Kim J,
    3. Oh EH,
    4. Hwang SW,
    5. Park SH,
    6. Yang DH, et al.
    Cost of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection in the colorectum. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65: 969-977.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Zhu Y,
    2. Ji M,
    3. Yuan L,
    4. Yuan J,
    5. Shen L.
    A risk prediction model for delayed bleeding after ESD for gastric precancerous lesions. Surg Endosc 2024; 38: 3967-3975.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Mimura T,
    2. Yamamoto Y,
    3. Suzuki H,
    4. Takizawa K,
    5. Hirasawa T,
    6. Takeuchi Y, et al.
    Risk factors for intraoperative and delayed perforation related with gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 39: 1358-1366.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Sugimoto M,
    2. Murata M,
    3. Kawai T.
    Assessment of delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of early-stage gastrointestinal tumors in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29: 2916-2931.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Fukuhara S,
    2. Kato M,
    3. Iwasaki E,
    4. Sasaki M,
    5. Tsutsumi K,
    6. Kiguchi Y, et al.
    Management of perforation related to endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial duodenal epithelial tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 1129-1137.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Kim TS,
    2. Min BH,
    3. Min YW,
    4. Lee H,
    5. Rhee PL,
    6. Kim JJ, et al.
    Delayed perforation occurring after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: clinical features and management strategy. Gut Liver 2024; 18: 40-49.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 46 (5)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 46, Issue 5
1 May 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pocket-creation method versus conventional method of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Pocket-creation method versus conventional method of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer
Min-Min Song, Feng-Bing Wang, Jian-Lin Yang, Hai-Yan Zhang, Tai-Ping Wang
Saudi Medical Journal May 2025, 46 (5) 450-458; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2025.46.5.20250045

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Pocket-creation method versus conventional method of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer
Min-Min Song, Feng-Bing Wang, Jian-Lin Yang, Hai-Yan Zhang, Tai-Ping Wang
Saudi Medical Journal May 2025, 46 (5) 450-458; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2025.46.5.20250045
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Breast cancer incidence after hormonal treatment for infertility
  • Advancing genetic counselling in Southern Africa
Show more Systematic Review

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • gastric cancers
  • gastric neoplasms
  • endoscopic submucosal dissection
  • ESD
  • pocket-creation method

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire