Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Comparison of light cycler PCR and conventional susceptibility testing for detection of MRSA from cultures

Mubarak S. Alfaresi
Saudi Medical Journal March 2005, 26 (3) 390-392;
Mubarak S. Alfaresi
Clinical Microbiologist, Department of Microbiology, Zayed Military Hospital, PO Box 3740, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Tel. +9712 4055863. Fax.+ 9712 4492075. E-mail: [email protected]
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare a duplex light cycler polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay targeting the mecA gene and a Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) specific marker and the conventional method.

METHODS: We evaluated 400 samples sent to the laboratory in Zayed Military Hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening and routine bacterial cultures from the period January 2003 to January 2004. All samples were cultured and identified according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standard guidelines. Staphylococcus aureus were tested for methicillin susceptibility according to the guidelines. All Staphylococcus positive cultures underwent testing by the new duplex light cycler PCR assay. We used 2 pairs of primers: mecA and nuc. Both targeted the mecA gene and the S. aureus-specific marker. Results obtained from the 2 methods (conventional culture method and the real-time PCR method) were compared.

RESULTS: From the 400 samples tested, a total of 9 MRSA were detected by both methods. The real-time PCR method took less than 60 minutes to complete.

CONCLUSION: This study shows that the duplex light cycler PCR assay method is very sensitive, very specific, and less time consuming in diagnosing MRSA from bacterial cultures.

  • Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 26 (3)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 26, Issue 3
1 Mar 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of light cycler PCR and conventional susceptibility testing for detection of MRSA from cultures
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of light cycler PCR and conventional susceptibility testing for detection of MRSA from cultures
Mubarak S. Alfaresi
Saudi Medical Journal Mar 2005, 26 (3) 390-392;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of light cycler PCR and conventional susceptibility testing for detection of MRSA from cultures
Mubarak S. Alfaresi
Saudi Medical Journal Mar 2005, 26 (3) 390-392;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The risk factors for cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Saudi Arabia
  • Prolonged flight exposure and its effects on sinonasal health among aircrew members
  • Identifying individuals at risk of post-stroke depression
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire