Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Comparison of propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia by means of blood loss during endoscopic sinus surgery

Remziye Sivaci, Mustafa D. Yilmaz, Canan Balci, Tuna Erincler and Halis Unlu
Saudi Medical Journal December 2004, 25 (12) 1995-1998;
Remziye Sivaci
Department of Anesthesiology, Kocatepe University, School of Medicine, Afyon, Turkey.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mustafa D. Yilmaz
Aku Ans Arastirma Hastanesi, (Pembe Hastane) KBB Anabilimdali, 03200 Afyon, Turkey. Tel. +90 (272) 2167901. Fax. +90 (272) 2172029. E-mail: [email protected]
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Canan Balci
Department of Anesthesiology, Kocatepe University, School of Medicine, Afyon, Turkey.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tuna Erincler
Department of Anesthesiology, Celal Bayar University, School of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Halis Unlu
Department of Otolaryngology, Celal Bayar University, School of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present investigation is to examine whether induced hypotension with propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia improves the dryness of surgical field in endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).

METHODS: The study was performed between 1999 and 2002 in Celal Bayar University and Afyon Kocatepe University Hospitals, Turkey. Thirty-two patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and III) with chronic sinusitis undergoing outpatient endoscopic sinus surgery under general anesthesia were studied to determine if anesthetic technique had an impact on estimated blood loss. The patients were allocated randomly into 2 groups. None of the patients were premedicated. Anesthesia was induced with propofol in both groups and maintained with propofol/fentanyl in the first group and sevoflurane/fentanyl in the second group. In both groups, controlled hypotension was used to improve surgical condition.

RESULTS: There were no differences between the duration of surgery and intraoperative mean arterial blood pressure when comparing the 2 groups. The average estimated blood loss in the propofol group was 128.1 +/- 37.3 ml compared with an average estimated blood loss of 296.9 +/- 97.8 ml in the sevoflurane group (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION: General anesthesia based on propofol infusion may have the advantage of decreased bleeding compared with conventional inhalation agents. Therefore, making endoscopic surgery technically easier and safer by improving endoscopic visualization of the surgical field.

  • Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 25 (12)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 25, Issue 12
1 Dec 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia by means of blood loss during endoscopic sinus surgery
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia by means of blood loss during endoscopic sinus surgery
Remziye Sivaci, Mustafa D. Yilmaz, Canan Balci, Tuna Erincler, Halis Unlu
Saudi Medical Journal Dec 2004, 25 (12) 1995-1998;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia by means of blood loss during endoscopic sinus surgery
Remziye Sivaci, Mustafa D. Yilmaz, Canan Balci, Tuna Erincler, Halis Unlu
Saudi Medical Journal Dec 2004, 25 (12) 1995-1998;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Exploring communication challenges with children and parents among pharmacists in Saudi Arabia
  • Exploring hypothyroidism’s effects on lipid profiles
  • Assessment of asthma control levels in a tertiary hospital
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire